<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org">
<title>Archives of Seismological Society of America recent issues</title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org</link>
<description>Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0037-1106</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1407?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1415?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1427?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1456?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1470?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1485?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1498?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1513?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1528?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1540?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1551?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1568?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1578?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1614?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1632?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1646?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1659?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1678?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1695?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1710?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1724?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1733?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1743?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1755?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1770?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1779?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1785?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1792?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1800?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1806?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1816?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1823?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1830?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/4/1836?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/4/1838?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/4/1840?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/901?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/910?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/923?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/941?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/954?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/969?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/995?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1010?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1031?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1051?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1073?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1089?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1107?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1120?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1138?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1153?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1165?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1174?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1184?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1196?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1211?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1225?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1241?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1252?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1263?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1276?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1288?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1293?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1306?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1320?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1342?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1350?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1356?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1363?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1370?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1375?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1381?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1389?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1395?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/423?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/447?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/458?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/473?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/482?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/497?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/509?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/522?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/532?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/541?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/562?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/570?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/585?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/598?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/606?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/618?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/629?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/640?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/657?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/670?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/684?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/699?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/712?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/733?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/751?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/762?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/776?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/792?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/802?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/819?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/826?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/833?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/841?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/851?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/859?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/868?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/876?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/882?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/891?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/896?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/2/898?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/37?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/59?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/74?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/87?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/102?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/116?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/131?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/151?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/172?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/196?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/207?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/225?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/241?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/256?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/267?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/289?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/298?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/307?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/325?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/343?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/349?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/364?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/377?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/384?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/392?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/402?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/1/406?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/1/408?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/1/416?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.bssaonline.org/icons/home/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/icons/home/title.gif">
<title>title</title>
<url>http://www.bssaonline.org/icons/home/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1407?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ground Motion-Based Testing of Seismic Hazard Models in New Zealand [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1407?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We develop a testing methodology for the New Zealand national probabilistic seismic hazard (PSH) model that builds on the groundwork of previous studies. Our fundamental approach is to test the full model, or in other words, the final output of the model (ground-motion exceedance for a given return period). Our results show that the PSH model is rejected as underpredicting the historical number of exceedances for specific peak ground acceleration (PGA) levels obtained directly from instrumental strong-motion data over the last 1&ndash;4 decades. However, when aftershock ground motions are removed from the strong-motion data, the model is not inconsistent with the observations. The implications for the PSH model are that the lack of aftershocks in the model led to initial model rejection and that the model may perform better for short (decadal) time periods if aftershocks are included in the PSH model. The results are different from those of earlier Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI)-based studies that suggested the PSH model was predicting hazard slightly higher than that of the historical record. Our new test dataset has the advantage of using observed PGA rather than PGA inferred from MMI. Establishment of a protocol for formally testing future versions of the New Zealand PSH model within a testing center such as those using the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability protocol will require consideration of the fact that the tests are limited by the available datasets of strong earthquake shaking.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stirling, M., Gerstenberger, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090336</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ground Motion-Based Testing of Seismic Hazard Models in New Zealand [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1414</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1407</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1415?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of 3D Random Correlated Velocity Perturbations on Predicted Ground Motions [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1415?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Three-dimensional, finite-difference simulations of a realistic finite-fault rupture on the southern Hayward fault are used to evaluate the effects of random, correlated velocity perturbations on predicted ground motions. Velocity perturbations are added to a three-dimensional (3D) regional seismic velocity model of the San Francisco Bay Area using a 3D von Karman random medium. Velocity correlation lengths of 5 and 10&nbsp;km and standard deviations in the velocity of 5% and 10% are considered. The results show that significant deviations in predicted ground velocities are seen in the calculated frequency range (&le;1 Hz) for standard deviations in velocity of 5% to 10%. These results have implications for the practical limits on the accuracy of scenario ground-motion calculations and on retrieval of source parameters using higher-frequency, strong-motion data.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hartzell, S., Harmsen, S., Frankel, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of 3D Random Correlated Velocity Perturbations on Predicted Ground Motions [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1426</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1415</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1427?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quantitative Comparison of Four Numerical Predictions of 3D Ground Motion in the Grenoble Valley, France [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1427?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article documents a comparative exercise for numerical simulation of ground motion, addressing the seismic response of the Grenoble site, a typical Alpine valley with complex 3D geometry and large velocity contrasts. Predictions up to 2&nbsp;Hz were asked for four different structure wave-field configurations (point source and extended source, with and without surface topography). This effort is part of a larger exercise organized for the third international symposium on the effects of surface geology (ESG 2006), the complete results of which are reported elsewhere (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf66">Tsuno <I>et&nbsp;al.</I>, 2009</cross-ref>).</p>
<p>While initial, blind computations significantly differed from one another, a remarkable fit was obtained after correcting for some nonmethodological errors for four 3D methods: the arbitrary high-order derivative discontinuous Galerkin method (ADER-DGM), the velocity-stress finite-difference scheme on an arbitrary discontinuous staggered grid (FDM), and two implementations of the spectral-element method (SEM1 and SEM2). Their basic formulation is briefly recalled, and their implementation for the Grenoble Valley and the corresponding requirements in terms of computer resources are detailed.</p>
<p>Besides a visual inspection of PGV maps, more refined, quantitative comparisons based on time-frequency analysis greatly help in understanding the origin of differences, with a special emphasis on phase misfit. The match is found excellent below 1&nbsp;Hz, and gradually deteriorates for increasing frequency, reflecting differences in meshing strategy, numerical dispersion, and implementation of damping properties.</p>
<p>While the numerical prediction of ground motion cannot yet be considered a mature, push-button approach, the good agreement reached by four participants indicates that, when used properly, numerical simulation is actually able to handle correctly wave radiation from extended sources in complex 3D media. The main recommendation to obtain reliable numerical predictions of earthquake ground motion is to use at least two different but comparably accurate methods, for instance the present formulations and implementations of the FDM, SEM, and ADER-DGM.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chaljub, E., Moczo, P., Tsuno, S., Bard, P.-Y., Kristek, J., Kaser, M., Stupazzini, M., Kristekova, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090052</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quantitative Comparison of Four Numerical Predictions of 3D Ground Motion in the Grenoble Valley, France [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1455</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1427</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1456?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Numerical Analysis of Near-Field Asymmetric Vertical Motion [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1456?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>During the 2008 Iwate&ndash;Miyagi Nairiku, Japan, earthquake (<I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;6.9), an unprecedented vertical surface acceleration of nearly four times gravity, was measured at the KiK-net, IWTH25 station located 3&nbsp;km southwest of the epicenter. The station is equipped with three-component accelerometers, installed at both the free surface and the bottom of a 260-m borehole. The waveform of the vertical acceleration shows a clearly asymmetric form with large amplitude in the upward direction. <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf1">Aoi <I>et&nbsp;al.</I> (2008)</cross-ref> reported and qualitatively explained the mechanism of this phenomenon by the analogy of bouncing a piece of matter on a trampoline; thus, they called it the trampoline effect. To study this recently discovered nonlinear behavior of the surface ground motion, numerical analysis with a two-dimensional finite-element method has been conducted with parameters derived from the borehole data at the station. The analysis successfully simulates the asymmetric vertical motion. Results indicate that the asymmetric motion may be characterized by the existence of a lower bound of negative acceleration, which in most cases corresponds to the acceleration of gravity and high positive pulses caused by the compression stress of the disturbed surface ground material.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobita, T., Iai, S., Iwata, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090301</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Numerical Analysis of Near-Field Asymmetric Vertical Motion [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1469</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1456</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1470?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Split-Step Algorithm for Effectively Suppressing the Numerical Dispersion for 3D Seismic Propagation Modeling [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1470?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In this article, we propose a 3D split-step algorithm (SSA) for seismic-wave simulation. We first transform the wave equations in 3D anisotropic media into a system of first-order partial differential equations with respect to time <I>t</I>. Then we use the multidimensional high-order interpolation method to approximate the high-order spatial derivatives, so that we obtain a system of semidiscrete ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Finally, the third-order implicit Adams method and truncated differentiator series method are applied to solve the semidiscrete ODEs. We provide the theoretical study on the properties of the 3D SSA, such as stability criteria, theoretical error, numerical error, numerical dispersion, and computational efficiency. We also compare some seismic modeling results of this method against those of some high-order finite-difference schemes. Theoretical analysis and numerical tests show that the 3D SSA is third-order accurate in time and fourth-order accurate in space. However, its computational costs and memory requirements are much less than those of the fourth-order Lax&ndash;Wendroff correction method and the fourth-order staggered-grid method. Using a multilayer elastic model with large velocity contrasts and free surface, we compare the result of the 3D SSA with that of the discrete-wavenumber method. We also present the synthetic seismograms in the 3D three-layer isotropic medium, the wave-field snapshots in the 3D two-layer medium, and the 3D transversely isotropic medium with a vertical symmetry axis. All these promising numerical results illustrate that the 3D SSA can suppress effectively the numerical dispersion caused by discretizing the wave equations when too few sampling points per minimum wavelength are used or when models have large velocity contrasts between adjacent layers, further resulting in both increasing the computational efficiency and saving the storage space when big grids are used.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, D., Wang, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090200</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Split-Step Algorithm for Effectively Suppressing the Numerical Dispersion for 3D Seismic Propagation Modeling [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1484</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1470</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1485?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dynamic Rupture through a Branched Fault Configuration at Yucca Mountain, and Resulting Ground Motions [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1485?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We seek to characterize the likelihood of multiple fault activation along a branched normal-fault system during earthquake rupture using dynamic finite element analyses. This is motivated by the normal faults in the vicinity of Yucca Mountain, Nevada, a potential site for a high-level radioactive waste repository. The Solitario Canyon fault (SCF), a north&ndash;south trending fault located approximately 1&nbsp;km west of the crest of Yucca Mountain, is the most active of these faults. Based on the results of previous branching work by <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf19">Kame <I>et&nbsp;al.</I> (2003)</cross-ref>, branch activation in the hanging wall of a normal fault such as the SCF may be possible for fast ruptures propagating near the Rayleigh-wave speed at the branch junction. Dynamic branch activation along a splay of the SCF during a seismic event could have important effects on the rupture velocity and resulting ground motions at the proposed repository site. We consider elastic as well as a pressure-dependent elastic&ndash;plastic response of the off-fault material. We find that based on the regional stress state in the area, the only likely candidates for branch activation in the hanging wall of the SCF are more steeply westward dipping intrablock splay faults. We also find that the rupture velocity for an earthquake propagating updip along the SCF must reach supershear speeds in order for dynamic branch activation to occur. Branch activation can have significant effects on the ground motions at the proposed repository site, 1&nbsp;km away from the SCF beneath the crest of Yucca Mountain, causing the repository site to experience a second peak in large vertical particle velocities. Elastic&ndash;plastic response near the branch junction reduces peak ground velocities and accelerations at the proposed repository site.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Templeton, E. L., Bhat, H. S., Dmowska, R., Rice, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090121</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dynamic Rupture through a Branched Fault Configuration at Yucca Mountain, and Resulting Ground Motions [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1497</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1485</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1498?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stochastic Strong Ground Motion Simulation of the 12 November 1999 Duzce (Turkey) Earthquake Using a Dynamic Corner Frequency Approach [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1498?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>On 12 November 1999, only three months after the 17 August 1999 Kocaeli earthquake (<I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB> 7.4), an earthquake of <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB> 7.1 occurred immediately to the east of the Kocaeli rupture in northwestern Turkey resulting in extensive structural damage in the city of D&uuml;zce and its surrounding area. It was reported to be a right-lateral strike slip event on the previously unbroken segment of the North Anatolian fault zone with a north-dipping fault plane. This paper presents stochastic finite-fault simulation of near-field ground motions from this earthquake at selected near-fault stations based on a dynamic corner frequency approach using the computer program EXSIM (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf51">Motazedian and Atkinson, 2005</cross-ref>). The method requires region-specific source, path, and site characterizations as input model parameters. The source mechanism of the 1999 D&uuml;zce event and regional path effects are well constrained from previous studies of the earthquake. The local site effects at the selected stations are studied as a combination of the kappa operator and frequency-dependent soil amplification. The model parameters are validated against recordings and a stress-drop value of 100&nbsp;bars is estimated for the 1999 D&uuml;zce earthquake. The validated model is then used to compute synthetic records around the fault. Distribution of peak ground-motion parameters is observed to be consistent with the building damage distribution in the near-fault region most affected by the seismic shaking. The attenuation of synthetic ground-motion parameters is compared with recent ground-motion prediction equations proposed for the region by <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf37">G&uuml;lkan and Kalkan (2002)</cross-ref>, <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf62">Ulusay <I>et&nbsp;al.</I> (2004)</cross-ref>, and <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf4">Akkar and Bommer (2007)</cross-ref>, as well as two next generation attenuation models by <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf20">Boore and Atkinson (2007)</cross-ref> and <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf30">Campbell and Bozorgnia (2007)</cross-ref>. Despite discrepancies at several stations, stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency approach confirms to be a practical tool to reproduce the ground motions of large earthquakes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ugurhan, B., Askan, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090358</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stochastic Strong Ground Motion Simulation of the 12 November 1999 Duzce (Turkey) Earthquake Using a Dynamic Corner Frequency Approach [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1512</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1498</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1513?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Selection of Empirical Green's Functions by Waveform Similarity Analysis: An Approach to Predict Ground Motion in Areas with Saturated Records [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1513?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This work is focused on a procedure based on selecting suitable empirical Green&rsquo;s functions (EGFs), able to predict ground motion for moderate earthquakes, in the case where no records are available due to saturation phenomena. The aim of the article is to generate synthetic seismograms for the 24 November 2004, <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB>&nbsp;5.2, Sal&ograve; earthquake (northern Italy), an event capable of saturating all velocimetric stations installed within the first 100&nbsp;km from the epicenter. The proposed approach uses a waveform similarity analysis, based on the normalized cross-correlation technique, and it is able to identify EGFs that represent doublet events of a target. The ground motion was finally simulated using the method proposed by <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf16">Irikura (1986)</cross-ref>.</p>
<p>In this case, due to the saturation of near-source velocimetric instruments, the normalized cross-correlation matrix was calculated considering the first not saturated velocimetric station (ASO2, 108&nbsp;km northeast to the epicenter), including the same selected portion of signals (on the base of signal-to-noise ratio) related both to the target and to 11 events, with <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB> ranging from 2.2 to 3.0, that occurred in the same area. The similarity analysis, performed through the bridging technique, allows us to detect an <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB>&nbsp;2.9 aftershock characterized by a meaningful degree of similarity (70%) compared to the target. Given as a fact that if two events are similar for a far-field station they have to be similar also for a near-source one, it was in this way possible to use the selected aftershock (doublet), recorded in near source to reproduce the target for the saturated near-source stations. The results of the simulations were compared with ground-motion values predicted by empirical ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs), calibrated using both Italian and European data.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Massa, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090296</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Selection of Empirical Green's Functions by Waveform Similarity Analysis: An Approach to Predict Ground Motion in Areas with Saturated Records [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1527</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1513</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1528?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Technically Induced Surface Wave Fields, Part I: Measured Attenuation and Theoretical Amplitude-Distance Laws [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1528?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The attenuation of the amplitudes with distance of technically induced surface wave fields is analyzed in theory and experiments. Experimental results of technically induced ground vibration are presented and collected from literature, which show a power-low attenuation <I>A</I>~<I>r</I><sup>-<I>q</I></sup> of amplitudes <I>A</I> with distance <I>r</I> and exponents <I>q</I>&gt;0.5 higher than for elastic surface waves. Additional attenuation effects are analyzed theoretically. The most important effect is due to the material or scattering damping. Each frequency component is attenuated exponentially as <I>A</I>~exp(-<I>kr</I>), but for a broadband excitation, the sum of the exponential laws yields a power law with a higher exponent. Some more effects are discussed, for example the dispersion of the Rayleigh wave due to the layering of the soil, which yields a stronger attenuation <I>A</I>~<I>r</I><sup>-<I>q</I>-<I>dq</I></sup>, including an additional exponent of <I>dq</I>=0.5 in case of an impulsive loading.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Auersch, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090228</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Technically Induced Surface Wave Fields, Part I: Measured Attenuation and Theoretical Amplitude-Distance Laws [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1539</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1528</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1540?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Technically Induced Surface Wave Fields, Part II: Measured and Calculated Admittance Spectra [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1540?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Transfer admittance spectra of technically induced surface wave fields are analyzed in theory and experiments. Theoretical admittance spectra of layered soils are obtained by integration in wavenumber domain and compared with experimental admittances due to hammer or vibrator excitation. The admittance spectra are strongly influenced by the layering and damping of the soil. Deep stiff-soil layers yield a low-frequency cutoff, whereas a strong damping yields a high-frequency cutoff. A sharp cutoff in a narrow frequency band, which is measured at some sites, can be explained by a damping that increases with frequency, such as viscous material or scattering damping.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Auersch, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090229</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Technically Induced Surface Wave Fields, Part II: Measured and Calculated Admittance Spectra [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1550</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1540</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1551?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multivariate Bayesian Regression Analysis Applied to Ground-Motion Prediction Equations, Part 1: Theory and Synthetic Example [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1551?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>An application of a linear multivariate Bayesian regression model to compute pseudoacceleration (SA) ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) is presented. The model is able to include the correlation between observations for a given earthquake, the correlation between SA ordinates at different periods, and the correlation between regression coefficients of the ground-motion prediction model. We evaluate the advantages of the Bayesian approach over the traditional regression methods, and we discuss the differences between univariate and multivariate analyses. Because the application of the Bayesian method is in general complex and implies an increase in the numerical effort with respect to the traditional methods, our computer code to perform linear Bayesian analyses is freely available on request.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arroyo, D., Ordaz, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080354</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multivariate Bayesian Regression Analysis Applied to Ground-Motion Prediction Equations, Part 1: Theory and Synthetic Example [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1567</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1551</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1568?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multivariate Bayesian Regression Analysis Applied to Ground-Motion Prediction Equations, Part 2: Numerical Example with Actual Data [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1568?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>An application of a linear multivariate Bayesian regression model, described in a companion article, to obtain a ground-motion prediction equation (GMPE) using a set of actual ground-motion records and a realistic functional form is presented. Based on seismological grounds and on an adopted functional form, we include a sound discussion about how the prior information required for the model can be defined. For the regression analyses we use two subsets of ground-motion records from the Next Generation of Ground-Motion Attenuation Models (NGA) database. We compare the results obtained with the Bayesian model with those obtained through the one-stage maximum-likelihood and the constrained maximum-likelihood methods. The advantages of the Bayesian approach over traditional regression techniques are discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arroyo, D., Ordaz, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090320</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multivariate Bayesian Regression Analysis Applied to Ground-Motion Prediction Equations, Part 2: Numerical Example with Actual Data [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1577</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1568</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1578?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Issues in Choosing the References to Use for Spectral Ratios from Observations and Modeling at Cavola Landslide in Northern Italy [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1578?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A reference site has to be free of amplification or deamplification effects, namely with no troughs and peaks in its Fourier amplitude spectrum. At the Cavola landslide we show that this spectrum is dependent on the direction of propagation of wavefronts for incidence angles in the range 30&deg;&ndash;90&deg;. Our study is based on comparison of spectral ratios from observations and 2D numerical simulations. We have modeled propagation in a 2D profile for <I>SH</I> and <I>SV</I> waves with several incidence angles in a range from 0&deg; to &plusmn;90&deg;, where 0&deg; and 90&deg; are, respectively, vertical and horizontal incidence, except that &plusmn;90&deg; denotes Rayleigh waves in the <I>P</I>-<I>SV</I>. We discuss in detail the result for angles of incidence of 0&deg;, &plusmn;20&deg;, &plusmn;60&deg;, &plusmn;90&deg;. We have obtained observed horizontal-to-horizontal spectral ratios using three reference sites. Two of these have matching receivers in the model, located at the opposite ends of the 2D profile. Overall observations are matched best when the reference site is located on the same side of the landslide as the incoming wavefront. We also find general agreement of the observed H/H spectral ratios from earthquakes with H/V and H/H spectral ratios from noise, and the match between H/V values from noise and synthetic spectral ratios using an absolute, flat half-space reference is very good. On the other hand, 1D modeling performs poorly in comparison with 2D modeling in our case, for which the shape ratio h/D=0.2 is intermediate between primarily 1D and strongly 2D wave propagation according to the classification of <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf3">Bard and Bouchon (1985)</cross-ref>.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bordoni, P., Di Giulio, G., Haines, A. J., Cara, F., Milana, G., Rovelli, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090116</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Issues in Choosing the References to Use for Spectral Ratios from Observations and Modeling at Cavola Landslide in Northern Italy [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1613</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1578</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1614?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Seismic Hazard Assessment in Terms of Macroseismic Intensity in Italy: A Critical Analysis from the Comparison of Different Computational Procedures [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1614?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Two probabilistic seismic hazard (PSH) maps in terms of macroseismic intensity characterized by an exceedance probability of 10% for exposure time of 50&nbsp;years are presented and compared. The first map adopts the standard Cornell&ndash;McGuire approach and follows the computational scheme developed for the reference Italian peak ground acceleration (PGA) hazard map (MPS04), while the second one is derived through an alternative methodology (referred to here as the site approach) that is based on statistical analysis of the site seismic history (i.e., macroseismic intensities documented for past earthquakes). Because the two procedures make a different use of available information, this comparison provides a new insight about the sensitivity of PSH estimates for the different possible methodological choices. In particular, it is shown that, though basic differences exist between the two adopted methodologies, relevant results appear consistent over most of Italy. However, at a significant number of investigated localities (Italian municipalities), PSH estimates provided by the site approach are larger than those derived from the standard technique. Thus, a detailed analysis has been carried out to evaluate the role played by different choices of computational models and input data. Among these, the use/nonuse of seismogenic zoning seems to act as the key element in determining the pattern of differences observed between the two PSH estimates.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomez Capera, A. A., D'Amico, V., Meletti, C., Rovida, A., Albarello, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090212</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Seismic Hazard Assessment in Terms of Macroseismic Intensity in Italy: A Critical Analysis from the Comparison of Different Computational Procedures [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1631</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1614</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1632?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determination of Stress Parameters for Eight Well-Recorded Earthquakes in Eastern North America [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1632?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We determined the stress parameter, <I></I>, for the eight earthquakes studied by <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf6">Atkinson and Boore (2006)</cross-ref>, using an updated dataset and a revised point-source stochastic model that captures the effect of a finite fault. We consider four geometrical-spreading functions, ranging from 1/<I>R</I> at all distances to two- or three-part functions. The <I></I> values are sensitive to the rate of geometrical spreading at close distances, with 1/<I>R</I><sup>1.3</sup> spreading implying much higher <I></I> than models with 1/<I>R</I> spreading. The important difference in ground motions of most engineering concern, however, arises not from whether the geometrical spreading is 1/<I>R</I><sup>1.3</sup> or 1/<I>R</I> at close distances, but from whether a region of flat or increasing geometrical spreading at intermediate distances is present, as long as <I></I> is constrained by data that are largely at distances of 100&nbsp;km&ndash;800&nbsp;km. The simple 1/<I>R</I> model fits the sparse data for the eight events as well as do more complex models determined from larger datasets (where the larger datasets were used in our previous ground-motion prediction equations); this suggests that uncertainty in attenuation rates is an important component of epistemic uncertainty in ground-motion modeling. For the attenuation model used by <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf6">Atkinson and Boore (2006)</cross-ref>, the average value of <I></I> from the point-source model ranges from 180&nbsp;bars to 250&nbsp;bars, depending on whether or not the stress parameter from the 1988 Saguenay earthquake is included in the average. We also find that <I></I> for a given earthquake is sensitive to its moment magnitude <b>M</b>, with a change of 0.1 magnitude units producing a factor of 1.3 change in the derived <I></I>.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boore, D. M., Campbell, K. W., Atkinson, G. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090328</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determination of Stress Parameters for Eight Well-Recorded Earthquakes in Eastern North America [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1645</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1632</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1646?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Seismicity of the New Madrid Seismic Zone Derived from a Deep-Seated Strike-Slip Fault [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1646?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A conceptual three-dimensional flower structure model of strike-slip faulting is proposed to explain the occurrence of earthquakes in the New Madrid seismic zone (NMSZ) and to illustrate the potential rupture faults for the 1811&ndash;1812 earthquake sequences. The proposed NMSZ model is based on elastic dislocation theory and concepts of material failure under a stress field. Using a conceptual model of a strike-slip subsidiary fault array, we identify tectonic features (geological structures) that are oriented properly relative to regional stresses and classify the regions where stresses might be expected to be amplified.</p>
<p>The brittle upper crust in the vicinity of the NMSZ is modeled as a uniform overburden with a horizontal-basal surface, which rests on a horizontal ductile lower crust that is cut by a vertical, northeast-striking right-lateral strike-slip shear zone. We acknowledge that many favorably oriented preexisting faults have been exploited as components of the flower structure. The brittle overburden material is subject to simple shearing stress parallel to the deep-seated lower crustal shear zone, and preexisting faults of the Reelfoot rift system give the upper crust a mechanical anisotropy (planes of weakness striking northeast) that is the correct orientation for development of <I>P</I> shear faults. The deep-seated fault movement deforms the overlying upper crust that controls the structural geometry, the modern seismicity, and the large earthquake sequences in the NMSZ.</p>
<p>The three-dimensional NMSZ model of faulting developed in this study shows that the Bootheel and Big Creek lineaments, inferred to be two subparallel <I>P</I> shear faults rooted in a deep-seated fault in the lower crust, are significant in shaping the geometry of the NMSZ. These series of faults produce a large-scale flower structure in cross section. The proposed NMSZ model uses the intersections of the deep-seated fault and the two subparallel <I>P</I> shear faults for the locations of the 1811 and 1812 earthquakes. The model gives rise to a predictable pattern of surface deformation that is in good agreement with the observed seismicity patterns in the region.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tavakoli, B., Pezeshk, S., Cox, R. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090220</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Seismicity of the New Madrid Seismic Zone Derived from a Deep-Seated Strike-Slip Fault [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1658</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1646</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1659?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Short-Term Uplift Rates and Surface Deformation along the Reelfoot Fault, New Madrid Seismic Zone [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1659?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study of variability in the amount and rate of deformation along the intraplate Reelfoot fault of the New Madrid seismic zone (NMSZ) utilizes diverse research methods, including geophysics, geomorphology, and fluvial sedimentology. The transpressional Reelfoot fault deforms late Holocene Mississippi River sediment into the Tiptonville dome and adjacent Reelfoot basin. Because Reelfoot Lake submerges a portion of the basin, subbottom acoustic profiling of the lake was used to quantify the relief on the uplift. At the natural levee of the abandoned Tiptonville meander, the most appropriate landform along the scarp for measuring cumulative structural relief, a maximum relative vertical uplift of approximately 11.3&nbsp;m was measured. To identify spatial and temporal variability in surface deformation using geologic methods, we relate fluvial sedimentation to three documented earthquake events during the past 2300&nbsp;yr (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf31">Tuttle <I>et&nbsp;al.</I>, 2002</cross-ref>, <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf30">2005</cross-ref>), which is the approximate age of the oldest deformed floodplain sediment (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf6">Guccione <I>et&nbsp;al.</I>, 2002</cross-ref>). Radiocarbon dates from organic material in fluvial and lacustrine sediment indicate that most of the uplift occurred during the last two major seismic events. A minimum of 1.6&ndash;3.9&nbsp;m of uplift was associated with the seismic episode at A.D.&nbsp;1450&plusmn;150 and a maximum of 5.9&ndash;8.2&nbsp;m of uplift was associated with the 1812 episode. We estimate a mean short-term uplift rate of 1.2 cm/yr (0.4&ndash;2.1 cm/yr with 80% probability) or a mean short-term slip rate of 1.3 cm/yr (0.5&ndash;2.3 cm/yr with 80% probability). These values are approximately 2.5&nbsp;times higher than the long-term rates based on the total amount of uplift averaged over the past 2300&nbsp;yr (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf18">Mueller <I>et&nbsp;al.</I>, 1999</cross-ref>; <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf32">Van Arsdale, 2000</cross-ref>). Estimating deformation rates associated with individual earthquake recurrences provides information on fluctuating activity of the NMSZ.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carlson, S. D., Guccione, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120100069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Short-Term Uplift Rates and Surface Deformation along the Reelfoot Fault, New Madrid Seismic Zone [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1677</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1659</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1678?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Geologic Evidence for Surface Rupture Associated with the 1847 M 7.4 Zenkoji Earthquake at Dannohara, Nagano City, Japan [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1678?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The 1847 <I>M</I>&nbsp;7.4 Zenkoji, Japan, earthquake was caused by movement of the west-dipping, western margin reverse-fault zone of the Nagano basin (WFZNB) and produced surface ruptures reported in Japanese historical documents. Despite previous studies to assess fault activity of the WFZNB, our trench excavation at Dannohara, Nagano City, exposed near-surface fault structures associated with the Zenkoji earthquake for the first time and provided geologic evidence for three earlier paleoseismic events. Three core samples 10&ndash;15&nbsp;m long defined a hanging-wall anticline beneath the trench. Although the primary fault was not observed, the revealed subsidiary features enabled us to discuss surface rupture morphology and its repetition patterns. We suggest that: (1)&nbsp;the east-dipping reverse faults exposed on the trench walls and the hanging-wall anticline are developed above a west-dipping blind reverse fault; (2)&nbsp;the east-dipping normal faults represent bending-moment faults at the crest of the hanging-wall anticline; (3)&nbsp;the exposed east-dipping faults slipped during the Zenkoji earthquake to produce elongated linear rise scarps described in historical documents; (4)&nbsp;the hanging-wall anticline grew during the earthquake to generate uplifted lands as reported in historical documents; and (5)&nbsp;faulting similar to that during the Zenkoji earthquake also occurred during the penultimate earthquake. We propose preliminary but better constraints on timing of the third and fourth latest faulting events, and a tentative and maximum recurrence interval of 800&ndash;1000 years for the WFZNB. To better understand reverse-fault rupture patterns for appropriate evaluation of seismic hazard, historical surface ruptures should be studied in more detail.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sugito, N., Okada, A., Tsutsumi, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090171</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Geologic Evidence for Surface Rupture Associated with the 1847 M 7.4 Zenkoji Earthquake at Dannohara, Nagano City, Japan [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1694</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1678</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1695?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Slip Distribution of the 1952 Kamchatka Great Earthquake Based on Near-Field Tsunami Deposits and Historical Records [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1695?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We explore the magnitude and slip distribution of the 1952 Kamchatka earthquake (<I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;8.8&ndash;9.0) using constraints from the 1952 Kamchatka tsunami. Our new field data provide more comprehensive coverage of the near-field tsunami than had been available to date. We examine the effects of internal slip distribution within complex earthquake ruptures on near-field tsunami runup and evaluate some of the limitations of this approach. Our approach compares tsunami-deposit distribution with simulated runup from tsunamis generated by different configurations of seafloor deformation from hypothetical earthquakes resembling that of the 1952 Kamchatka earthquake. We identify areas of high slip because different distributions of seafloor deformation result in variations in tsunami runup in the near field. Mapped deposits and local observations of the 1952 Kamchatka tsunami indicate that near-field runup in central Kamchatka was consistently less than 10&nbsp;m (averaging 6&nbsp;m), while south Kamchatka to the northern Kuril Islands had more variability and higher average runup (8&nbsp;m runup in South Kamchatka and 10&nbsp;m runup in the northern Kuril Islands). Our simulations show that in order to produce the distribution of runup indicated by tsunami deposits and historical observations, the 1952 earthquake had regions of high slip off the coast of southern Kamchatka, and the location of high slip is shallower in the subduction zone than previously interpreted.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacInnes, B. T., Weiss, R., Bourgeois, J., Pinegina, T. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090376</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Slip Distribution of the 1952 Kamchatka Great Earthquake Based on Near-Field Tsunami Deposits and Historical Records [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1709</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1695</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1710?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[High-Resolution Seismic Reflection Imaging of Growth Folding and Shallow Faults beneath the Southern Puget Lowland, Washington State [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1710?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Marine seismic reflection data from southern Puget Sound, Washington, were collected to investigate the nature of shallow structures associated with the Tacoma fault zone and the Olympia structure. Growth folding and probable Holocene surface deformation were imaged within the Tacoma fault zone beneath Case and Carr Inlets. Shallow faults near potential field anomalies associated with the Olympia structure were imaged beneath Budd and Eld Inlets. Beneath Case Inlet, the Tacoma fault zone includes an ~350-m wide section of south-dipping strata forming the upper part of a fold (kink band) coincident with the southern edge of an uplifted shoreline terrace. An ~2 m change in the depth of the water bottom, onlapping postglacial sediments, and increasing stratal dips with increasing depth are consistent with late Pleistocene to Holocene postglacial growth folding above a blind fault. Geologic data across a topographic lineament on nearby land indicate recent uplift of late Holocene age. Profiles acquired in Carr Inlet 10&nbsp;km to the east of Case Inlet showed late Pleistocene or Holocene faulting at one location with ~3 to 4&nbsp;m of vertical displacement, south side up. North of this fault the data show several other disruptions and reflector terminations that could mark faults within the broad Tacoma fault zone. Seismic reflection profiles across part of the Olympia structure beneath southern Puget Sound show two apparent faults about 160&nbsp;m apart having 1 to 2&nbsp;m of displacement of subhorizontal bedding. Directly beneath one of these faults, a dipping reflector that may mark the base of a glacial channel shows the opposite sense of throw, suggesting strike-slip motion. Deeper seismic reflection profiles show disrupted strata beneath these faults but little apparent vertical offset, consistent with strike-slip faulting. These faults and folds indicate that the Tacoma fault and Olympia structure include active structures with probable postglacial motion.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clement, C. R., Pratt, T. L., Holmes, M. L., Sherrod, B. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080306</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[High-Resolution Seismic Reflection Imaging of Growth Folding and Shallow Faults beneath the Southern Puget Lowland, Washington State [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1723</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1710</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1724?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A General Method to Estimate Earthquake Moment and Magnitude Using Regional Phase Amplitudes [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1724?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article presents a general method of estimating earthquake magnitude using regional phase amplitudes, called regional <I>M</I><SUB>0</SUB> or regional <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>. Conceptually, this method uses an earthquake source model along with an attenuation model and geometrical spreading that accounts for the propagation to utilize regional phase amplitudes of any phase and frequency. Amplitudes are corrected to yield a source term from which one can estimate the seismic moment. Moment magnitudes can then be reliably determined with sets of observed phase amplitudes rather than predetermined ones and afterward averaged to robustly determine this parameter. We first examine in detail two events to demonstrate the methodology. We then look at various ensembles of phases and frequencies and compare results to existing regional methods. We find regional <I>M</I><SUB>0</SUB> to be a stable estimator of earthquake size that has several advantages over other methods. Because of its versatility, it is applicable to many more events, particularly smaller events. We make moment estimates for earthquakes ranging from magnitude 2 to as large as 7. Even with diverse input amplitude sources, we find magnitude estimates with this method to be more robust than typical magnitudes and existing regional methods, and the magnitude estimates might be tuned further to improve upon them. The method yields a more meaningful quantity of seismic moment, which can be recast as <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>. Lastly, it is applied here to the Middle East region using an existing calibration model, but it would be easy to transport to any region with suitable attenuation calibration.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pasyanos, M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090363</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A General Method to Estimate Earthquake Moment and Magnitude Using Regional Phase Amplitudes [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1732</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1724</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1733?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Changes of Reporting Rates in the Southern California Earthquake Catalog, Introduced by a New Definition of ML [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1733?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Starting January 2008, local magnitudes <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB> for southern California are determined by a new calibration that provides various improvements for determining <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB> for small earthquakes. Magnitudes for the previous years are being recalculated and the catalog continuously updated, with the first year of overlapping data now being available. Recalibrating a magnitude scale can cause a break in homogeneity of reporting and often produces artifacts in the catalog statistics that can influence a wide range of seismicity studies. To search for such a break, we compare the old <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB> and the new <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB> catalogs for 2007. We find (1)&nbsp;the two magnitude values differ for 96% of the <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB> events, and hand-determined magnitudes are also revised; (2)&nbsp;the magnitude differences are irregular from magnitude increases of up to 1.5&nbsp;units to reductions by as much as 2.3&nbsp;units, with an average change of -0.13 units; (3)&nbsp;the number of events above <I>M</I>&nbsp;1.8 decreases by 32% for the new magnitude scale; (4)&nbsp;the completeness magnitude apparently drops by 0.3&nbsp;units from 1.6 to 1.3; (5)&nbsp;the <I>b</I>-value reduces by approximately 0.2&nbsp;units, dropping from 1.16 to 0.95; (6)&nbsp;the new magnitude calibration produces a more stable <I>b</I>-value estimate and can therefore be regarded as the better scaling.</p>
<p>We document selected examples of how the change in magnitude calibration may affect seismicity- and hazard-related analyses that are based on the Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN) catalog. Especially the change of the <I>b</I>-value from ~1.1 to ~0.9 has potentially major implications for hazard related applications.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tormann, T., Wiemer, S., Hauksson, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090124</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Changes of Reporting Rates in the Southern California Earthquake Catalog, Introduced by a New Definition of ML [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1742</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1733</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1743?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Application of Gaussian-Beam Migration to Multiscale Imaging of the Lithosphere beneath the Hi-CLIMB Array in Tibet [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1743?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In this study, we apply Gaussian-beam (GB) migration of scattered teleseismic <I>P</I> waves to image the crust and upper mantle beneath Tibet using data from the Hi-CLIMB experiment. We use teleseismic <I>P</I> waves from three groups of earthquakes to the southeast, northeast, and northwest of the Hi-CLIMB array, each within a narrow range of azimuth and distance, to obtain stacked radial receiver functions, which we then use to image the lithosphere by GB migration. We produced images at several different frequency bands in order to constrain the multiscale scattering properties of the lithosphere. For each frequency band, three GB images are generated, each from earthquake sources in a distinct back-azimuth group. The three images are then stacked to form a composite image. The imaged Moho is generally strong and continuous under much of the Lhasa terrane in southern Tibet, corresponding to a well-defined Moho. A major disrupted zone in Moho scattering, extending over 200&nbsp;km in length, is evident in the vicinity of the Bangong&ndash;Nujiang suture, where there is also increased crustal scattering. The disrupted zone marks the diffuse, subsurface join between stable portions of mantle lithosphere under southern and central Tibet, respectively. At the northern end of the profile in the Qiangtang terrane there is an increase in Moho reflectivity but at a shallower depth than under the Lhasa terrane. Comparable length scales of about 200&nbsp;km between regions with disrupted and smooth-varying Moho suggest that the mechanically strong mantle lithosphere and the crust respond differently to collision, with the upper crust currently undergoing pervasive strain over the entire plateau.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nowack, R. L., Chen, W.-P., Tseng, T.-L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090207</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Application of Gaussian-Beam Migration to Multiscale Imaging of the Lithosphere beneath the Hi-CLIMB Array in Tibet [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1754</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1743</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1755?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How is Volcano Seismicity Different from Tectonic Seismicity? [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1755?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We analyze the temporal patterns of volcano seismicity using the statistics of waiting times between subsequent earthquakes. We compare waiting time distributions of seismicity at Mt. Etna and Mt. Vesuvius volcanoes during (1)&nbsp;inter-eruption phases and (2)&nbsp;dyke propagations, with those of tectonic seismicity using the southern California catalog. For inter-eruption phases, no matter their duration, statistics of inter-event times are well approximated by the gamma distribution. This allows us to compute the proportion of background uncorrelated events (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf41">Molchan, 2005</cross-ref>; <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf30">Hainzl <I>et&nbsp;al.</I>, 2006</cross-ref>), which is recovered in the range 20%&ndash;40% for Vesuvius, three Etna inter-eruptive periods, and the southern California catalog. It argues for roughly 70% of earthquake activity to be cascades of aftershocks for both volcano inter-eruptive and tectonic seismicity. On the contrary, statistics of inter-event times recorded during both the 2001 and 2002 intrusive episodes at the Etna volcano reject the gamma distribution to describe the observations. These seismic crises are characterized by an average seismicity rate about 2 orders of magnitude larger than that of inter-eruptive periods. It suggests that the origin of the specificity of waiting time patterns during dyke injections is driven by the external forcing rate. Using the epydemic type aftershock sequences model simulations we explore the effect of seismicity rate increases on inter-event time distributions. Departures from the gamma law progressively emerges from both (1)&nbsp;an increase of the background seismicity rate and (2)&nbsp;a screening effect. It prevents us from quantifying the portion of uncorrelated seismicity within the considered catalog and from clearly quantifying the forcing rate that characterizes the volcano dynamics during dyke intrusions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Traversa, P., Grasso, J.-R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090214</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How is Volcano Seismicity Different from Tectonic Seismicity? [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1769</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1755</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1770?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Shallow-Water Broadband OBS Seismology [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1770?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The recent development of broadband ocean-bottom seismometers that can be deployed for more than a year has led to the construction of large ocean-bottom seismometer (OBS) fleets and to many successful experiments studying Earth structure and tectonics beneath the oceans. However, ocean surface waves raise noise levels at deep ocean-floor sites far above those at continental sites in the microseism band between 0.2 and 10&nbsp;sec period, and currents and ocean waves raise noise levels at longer periods. Broadband OBSs are rarely deployed in shallow water because of a fear of loss due to bottom trawling and an expectation of very high noise levels from strong currents and the nearby ocean surface. However, these noise sources can be overcome such that shallow OBS deployments may provide noise levels that are comparable to deep-water sites at periods &gt;10 sec and lower than deep-water sites at shorter periods. Burial of the instrument into the sediments can shield the seismometer from current noise, while the noise from deformation under wave loading can be removed using pressure gauge data. We predict the noise levels can be reduced to allow the detection of Rayleigh waves from 20 to 200&nbsp;sec period with good signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) from teleseismic earthquakes as small as <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;5. Short-period (&lt;2 sec) noise levels will be 20&ndash;30&nbsp;dB lower in shallow water than in deep water because short-period microseisms are greatly attenuated during propagation from deep to shallow water. Short-period (0.5&ndash;2&nbsp;sec) teleseismic body waves should be detected with good SNR from events as small as <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;4.5.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Webb, S. C., Crawford, W. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090203</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Shallow-Water Broadband OBS Seismology [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1778</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1770</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1779?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Relative Locations of the October 2006 and May 2009 DPRK Announced Nuclear Tests Using International Monitoring System Seismometer Arrays [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1779?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Waveform data recorded at seven of the International Monitoring System (IMS) seismometer arrays are used to measure the relative times of teleseismic <I>P</I> signals with three methods: analyst picks, and two methods that make full use of the capabilities of seismometer arrays, the cross correlation of array beams and the average of channel-by-channel cross correlations. These times are used to estimate the relative locations of the 9 October 2006 and 25 May 2009 Democratic People&rsquo;s Republic of Korea announced underground nuclear tests. The 2009 test is found to have occurred about 1.8&plusmn;0.8 km to the west and 0.4&plusmn;0.6 km to the north of the 2006 test. The use of cross correlation reduces the standard deviation of the travel-time residuals from ~0.05 to ~0.01 sec, enabling the two epicenters to be statistically distinguished with high confidence. This result demonstrates the power of a small number of IMS seismometer arrays at teleseismic distances to detect and relatively locate small explosions with high precision.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Selby, N. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120100006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Relative Locations of the October 2006 and May 2009 DPRK Announced Nuclear Tests Using International Monitoring System Seismometer Arrays [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1784</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1779</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1785?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Empirically Based Ground Truth Criteria for Seismic Events Recorded at Local Distances on Regional Networks with Application to Southern Africa [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1785?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We present a new approach to obtaining empirically based (EB) criteria for estimating the epicentral location accuracy (i.e., ground truth, GT) of seismic events recorded at local distances on a regional network. The approach has been developed using a jackknife resampling method applied to carefully picked <I>Pg</I> phase arrival times for GT reference events from several South African gold mines. The events were well recorded locally by Southern African Seismic Experiment (SASE) stations within the Archean Kaapvaal craton, an area of relatively simple crustal structure. The region-specific criteria obtained specify an EBGT3<SUB>95%</SUB> level of epicentral accuracy if events are recorded on eight or more stations at distances less than the <I>Pg</I>/<I>Pn</I> crossover (215&nbsp;km) when the stations have a primary azimuthal gap &lt;202 degrees. In addition, when nine or more stations are used for event location and one of them is within 79&nbsp;km of the event, we find that a focal depth accuracy of 4&nbsp;km at the 95% confidence level can be obtained and that an accuracy of 6&nbsp;km can be obtained if eight stations are used. This result illustrates that GT criteria commonly applied to global event catalogs can be relaxed if an accurate velocity model and carefully picked phase-arrival times are used for event locations. Consequently, it is likely that additional events can be added to GT compilations by developing EBGT criteria for other regional networks and using them to identify candidate GT events. For example, the EBGT criteria developed in this study, when applied to the SASE seismicity catalog, yields 10 new GT events.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boomer, K. B., Brazier, R. A., Nyblade, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090237</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Empirically Based Ground Truth Criteria for Seismic Events Recorded at Local Distances on Regional Networks with Application to Southern Africa [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1791</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1785</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1792?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Reevaluation of the 1958 Fairweather, Alaska, Earthquake Sequence [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1792?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>I have relocated aftershocks, performed waveform modeling, and modeled induced Coulomb failure stress to better determine rupture extent and controls on the rupture process of the 1958 Fairweather earthquake sequence in southeastern Alaska. I estimate a fault rupture length range from 260&nbsp;km (source time function duration) to 370&nbsp;km (aftershock zone length). I estimate an average slip of 3.5&nbsp;m from waveform modeling, comparable to measured surface (2&ndash;3.5&nbsp;m) slip. The largest pulses of moment release along the Fairweather fault zone may have occurred near Lituya Bay, where a huge landslide and subsequent water wave were produced, and near Dry Bay, the location of the mainshock&rsquo;s intensity center. The region of high moment release near Lituya Bay correlates with a gravity high located northeast of the fault zone. Coulomb failure modeling suggests aftershocks were most likely to have occurred on northwest striking reverse faults. These new source parameters indicate the 1958 mainshock was comparable in size to the 2002 <I>M</I>&nbsp;7.9 Denali fault earthquake and shared other similarities with the 2002 event.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doser, D. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090343</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Reevaluation of the 1958 Fairweather, Alaska, Earthquake Sequence [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1799</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1792</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1800?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Record-Breaking Earthquakes [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1800?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A record-breaking earthquake has a larger magnitude than any previous earthquake in the study region; a starting date and minimum magnitude must be specified. The first earthquake to satisfy this condition is, by definition, a record-breaking earthquake. The next record-breaking earthquake has a larger magnitude than the first and so forth. In this article we utilize the global Centroid Moment Tensor Project (CMT) catalog for the years 1977 to 2006. We consider earthquakes with moment magnitudes greater than 5.5. We determine the number of record-breaking earthquakes <I>n</I><SUB>rb</SUB> during 15 specified two-year intervals. We then average the <I>n</I><SUB>rb</SUB> at specified subintervals of time. We compare the results with the predictions for a random independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) process. The expected number of record-breaking earthquakes <I>n</I><SUB>rb</SUB> in a specified period is independent of the statistical distribution of magnitudes. Good statistical agreement between the observations and the predictions is obtained. We carry out the same process for the magnitudes of the record-breaking earthquakes. We again compare the results with the predictions for a random (i.i.d.) process and find good agreement. For our analyses to be valid, it is necessary that the global earthquakes occur randomly, that is, they are not correlated. Thus, aftershocks and foreshocks will be sources of error. Studies of record-breaking temperatures have shown a sensitivity to global warming. A future direction for research is to apply the approach used here to regional earthquake catalogs. Aftershocks are expected to strongly influence the results.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van Aalsburg, J., Newman, W. I., Turcotte, D. L., Rundle, J. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Record-Breaking Earthquakes [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1805</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1800</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1806?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Calibration of Acoustic Gauge in the Field Using Seismic Lg Phase and Coupled High-Frequency Local Infrasound [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1806?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Local microphone field calibration can be performed using seismic signals recorded by a well calibrated seismometer. When the 29 May 2004 regional earthquake (<I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;5.1) occurred off the coast of Korea, the <I>Pn</I>, <I>Pg</I>, and <I>Lg</I> seismic phases produced high-frequency (1&ndash;4&nbsp;Hz) local infrasound signals at the Chulwon Seismo-Acoustic Array (CHNAR), an array deployed in the Republic of Korea. Instrument-corrected waveforms of seismic signals are compared to those of local infrasound signals using time-varying coherence estimates to identify the time window and bandwidth for the calibration process. Based on this assessment, the first 6.4&nbsp;sec of the <I>Lg</I> phase and the coupled infrasound signals from 1 to 4&nbsp;Hz are used. Envelope functions for the instrument-corrected <I>Lg</I> phase and local infrasound signal are calculated and integrated in the time domain. The transfer function from ground velocity to atmospheric pressure perturbation is estimated in the time domain using the ratio of the integrated envelope functions. The observed transfer functions estimated in this way are compared to the theoretical transfer function based on a model relating ground velocity to pressure perturbation, which is dependent on the density of air and speed of sound at the surface. A maximum difference of 4&nbsp;dB is apparent between observed transfer functions and theory for highly correlated seismic and coupled infrasound signals (&gt;0.8). Six factors are considered as contributors to these differences, including the porous hose array attached to each acoustic sensor for noise reduction, variations in the density of air or speed of sound, local perturbations in air pressure, differences in ground velocity at each sensor, and differences in acoustic instrument sensitivity. Variations of the acoustic gauge&rsquo;s sensitivities at CHNAR are identified using a laboratory calibration procedure and documented as the major contributor to the difference between observed and theoretical transfer function at CHNAR.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, T. S., Hayward, C. T., Stump, B. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090262</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Calibration of Acoustic Gauge in the Field Using Seismic Lg Phase and Coupled High-Frequency Local Infrasound [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1815</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1806</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1816?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transverse Tectonics in the Sikkim Himalaya: Evidence from Seismicity and Focal-Mechanism Data [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1816?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In the present study, about 356 local earthquakes in the region of the Sikkim Himalaya have been accurately located and analyzed using 2181 <I>P</I> travel times and 2161 <I>S</I> travel times from a network of 11 broadband seismic stations operated by the National Geophysical Research Institute during January 2006 to November 2007. Further refinement of the hypocentral parameters using the hypoDD relocation program resulted in 198 well-constrained locations. Interestingly, this study reveals several characteristic features that distinguish Sikkim from the rest of the Himalaya. The seismicity distribution is found to be confined mostly between the main boundary thrust (MBT) and the main central thrust (MCT) but not quite associated with either. While the entire Himalayan front is generally characterized by shallow-angle thrust faulting, focal mechanisms in this region are predominantly of strike-slip type in conformity with a right-lateral strike-slip mechanism along the northwest-trending Tista and Gangtok lineaments. The <I>P</I>-axis trends of earthquake focal mechanisms are clearly oriented north-northwest, marking a clear transition from the ambient north-northeast trending direction of Indian plate motion with respect to the Eurasian plate all along the Himalayan front. Moderate-sized earthquakes occur down to 70&nbsp;km depth in this region, compared to an average focal depth of 15&ndash;20&nbsp;km in the rest of the Himalaya. Also, a high average crustal <I>P</I> velocity of 6.66 km/sec and a fairly low <I>b</I> value of 0.83&plusmn;0.04 are obtained indicating the probability of occurrence of a higher magnitude earthquake in the future. A north&ndash;south section in the Sikkim region shows a relatively flat topography, unlike in the rest of the Himalayan mountain chain and suggestive of lower rates of convergence in the recent geologic past. It is proposed that crustal shortening in the Sikkim Himalaya has been substantially accommodated by transverse tectonics rather than underthrusting in recent times.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hazarika, P., Kumar, M. R., Srijayanthi, G., Raju, P. S., Rao, N. P., Srinagesh, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090339</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transverse Tectonics in the Sikkim Himalaya: Evidence from Seismicity and Focal-Mechanism Data [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1822</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1816</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1823?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ground-Motion Difference between Two Moderate-Size Intraplate Earthquakes in the United Kingdom [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1823?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Two moderate-size earthquakes occurred in the United Kingdom, the first near Folkestone in 2007 with <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;4.0 and the second near Market Rasen in 2008 with <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;4.5. Both were strongly felt and caused some nonstructural damage. The earthquakes occurred at significantly different depths, the Folkestone earthquake at 5&nbsp;km and the Market Rasen earthquake at 20&nbsp;km. We determined the seismic moment and the stress drop of the two mainshocks, and two smaller earthquakes in the same locations, by modeling the source displacement spectra. We found stress drops of 30&plusmn;34 bar and 344&plusmn;136 bar for the Folkestone and Market Rasen mainshocks, respectively. This is a significant difference considering the earthquakes are only 275&nbsp;km apart and both are of intraplate origin. We applied the stochastic ground-motion modeling technique and used the stress drop and seismic moment to compute vertical component peak ground acceleration. The modeled ground motions are consistent with the observations. We also computed vertical peak ground acceleration for a hypothetical <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;6.0 high stress-drop (200&nbsp;bar) earthquake and found that it would be 4.6 m/sec<sup>2</sup> at 20&nbsp;km hypocentral distance.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottemoller, L., Sargeant, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090152</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ground-Motion Difference between Two Moderate-Size Intraplate Earthquakes in the United Kingdom [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1829</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1823</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1830?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Orientation-Independent, Nongeometric-Mean Measures of Seismic Intensity from Two Horizontal Components of Motion [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/4/1830?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>New measures of spectral intensity based on the horizontal components of ground shaking are introduced. These new measures are independent of the in situ orientation of the recordings and encompass the full range of spectral amplitudes over all possible rotation angles. Unlike previously introduced measures that are also orientation independent, no geometric means are used in the computation of the new measures. The new measures based on fiftieth percentile values of the response spectra show small but systematic increases (to a factor of about 1.07 at a 10&nbsp;sec period) compared to the comparable geometric-mean measure.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boore, D. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090400</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Orientation-Independent, Nongeometric-Mean Measures of Seismic Intensity from Two Horizontal Components of Motion [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1835</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1830</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/4/1836?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comment on "Review: Strong Ground Motions--Have We Seen the Worst?" by Fleur O. Strasser and Julian J. Bommer [Comment and Reply]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/4/1836?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castanos, H., Lomnitz, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090381</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comment on "Review: Strong Ground Motions--Have We Seen the Worst?" by Fleur O. Strasser and Julian J. Bommer [Comment and Reply]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1837</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1836</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Comment and Reply</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/4/1838?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to "Comment on 'Review: Strong Ground Motions--Have We Seen the Worst?' by Fleur O. Strasser and Julian J. Bommer" by Heriberta Castanos and Cinna Lomnitz [Comment and Reply]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/4/1838?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Strasser, F. O., Bommer, J. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120100020</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to "Comment on 'Review: Strong Ground Motions--Have We Seen the Worst?' by Fleur O. Strasser and Julian J. Bommer" by Heriberta Castanos and Cinna Lomnitz [Comment and Reply]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1839</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1838</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Comment and Reply</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/4/1840?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Erratum to The Influence of Maximum Magnitude on Seismic-Hazard Estimates in the Central and Eastern United States [Erratum]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/4/1840?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mueller, C. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:50:27 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120100089</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Erratum to The Influence of Maximum Magnitude on Seismic-Hazard Estimates in the Central and Eastern United States [Erratum]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1840</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1840</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Erratum</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/901?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Large Earthquake Triggering, Clustering, and the Synchronization of Faults [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/901?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Large earthquakes are sometimes observed to trigger other large earthquakes on nearby faults. The magnitudes of the calculated Coulomb stress transfers presumed to cause the triggering are 10<sup>-2</sup>&ndash;10<sup>-3</sup> of the earthquake stress drops. The earthquake stress drops and the triggering delay times are similarly small with respect to the natural recurrence time of the earthquakes. This requires that both faults be simultaneously very close to the ends of their seismic cycles. Paleoseismological data show that for the same regions prior earthquakes have occurred in clusters of ruptures of several faults separated by long quiescent periods. Both observations suggest that synchronization is occurring between faults. Theory and observations indicate that synchronization can occur between nearby faults with positive stress coupling and intrinsic slip velocities within an entrainment threshold. In the south Iceland seismic zone, the central Nevada seismic belt, and the eastern California shear zone, several synchronous clusters that apparently act independently can be recognized. This behavior is the 3D equivalent of the phase locking that results in the seismic cycle of individual faults being dominated by large characteristic earthquakes, and for synchronization of fault segments along a given fault. Rupture patterns of repeated individual earthquakes or earthquake clusters are not identical in either the 2D or 3D cases. The state of this system, which exhibits strong indications of synchrony without exact repetition, may be called fuzzy synchrony.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scholz, C. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:47 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090309</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Large Earthquake Triggering, Clustering, and the Synchronization of Faults [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>909</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>901</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/910?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trade-Offs among Dynamic Parameters Inferred from Results of Dynamic Source Inversion [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/910?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Dynamic rupture simulations have been performed in order to generate a physically consistent slip distribution. In these simulations, an attempt has been made to investigate the governing parameters, called dynamic parameters, of historical earthquakes. However, it has been reported that the parameters are not estimated accurately when only the ground motion records are employed; this is because of the trade-offs existing between the parameters, for example, between the strength excess and the slip-weakening distance. In this article, we apply a dynamic source inversion to 2D synthetic tests in order to discuss parameter trade-offs. Sensitivity tests, which consist of numerous sets of inversions including a fixed stage and a released stage, are conducted such that a particular set of estimation parameters is not estimated in the fixed stage; then all of the parameters are estimated in the released stage. The results imply trade-offs between the rupture time and other parameters. From detailed comparisons between slip rates and waveforms, it is observed that the shapes of the slip-rate profiles between the rupture time and the peak time do not contribute well to the generated waveforms. From a simple 1D assumption, a gradient of the slip-weakening friction law, namely, a weakening gradient, is analytically related to the peak-to-rupture time with a -1 slope in the log&ndash;log plot. The values estimated from the synthetic tests almost mirror the values of the -1 slope. The results imply the trade-offs between the weakening gradient and the peak-to-rupture time.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goto, H., Sawada, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080250</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trade-Offs among Dynamic Parameters Inferred from Results of Dynamic Source Inversion [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>922</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>910</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/923?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How to Promote Earthquake Ruptures: Different Nucleation Strategies in a Dynamic Model with Slip-Weakening Friction [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/923?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The introduction of the linear slip-weakening friction law permits the solution of the elastodynamic equation for a rupture that develops on a fault by removing the singularity in the components of stress tensor, thereby ensuring a finite energy flux at the crack tip. With this governing model, largely used by seismologists, it is possible to simulate a single earthquake event; but, in the absence of remote tectonic loading, it requires the introduction of an artificial procedure to initiate the rupture (i.e., to reach the failure stress point). In this article, by studying the dynamic rupture propagation and the solutions on the fault and on the free surface, I systematically compare three conceptually and algorithmically different nucleation strategies widely adopted in the literature: the imposition of an initially constant rupture speed, the introduction of a shear stress asperity, and the perturbation to the initial particle velocity field. My results show that, contrary to supershear ruptures, which tend to forget their origins, subshear ruptures are quite sensitive to the adopted nucleation procedure, which can bias the runaway rupture. I confirm that the most gradual transition from imposed nucleation and spontaneous propagation is obtained by initially forcing the rupture to expand at a properly chosen, constant speed (0.75&nbsp;times the Rayleigh speed). I also numerically demonstrate that a valid alternative to this strategy is an appropriately smoothed, elliptical shear stress asperity. Moreover, I evaluate the optimal size of the nucleation patch where the procedure is applied; the simulations indicate that its size has to equal the critical distance of <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf19">Day (1982)</cross-ref> in the case of supershear ruptures and to exceed it in the case of subshear ruptures.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bizzarri, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090179</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How to Promote Earthquake Ruptures: Different Nucleation Strategies in a Dynamic Model with Slip-Weakening Friction [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>940</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>923</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/941?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Variability of Kinematic Source Parameters and Its Implication on the Choice of the Design Scenario [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/941?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Near-fault seismic recordings for recent earthquakes (Chi Chi earthquake, 1999, and Parkfield earthquake, 2004) show the high spatial heterogeneity of ground motion. This variability is controlled by fault geometry, rupture complexity, and also by wave propagation and site effects. Nowadays, the number of available records in the near-source region is still not enough to infer a robust parameterization of the ground motion and to retrieve multiparametric predictive equations valid at close distances from the fault. The use of a synthetic approach may help to overcome this limitation and to study the strong ground motion variability. In this article we focus on ground-motion dependence on different earthquakes breaking the same fault, as it has been rarely recorded by instruments. We model seismic scenarios from different rupture models of a fault similar to the 1980 Irpinia, Italy, earthquake source (<I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;6.9). A discrete wavenumber/finite element technique is used to compute full-wave displacement and velocity time series in the low-frequency band (up to 2&nbsp;Hz).</p>
<p>We investigate the variability of the ground motion as a function of different source parameters (rupture velocity, slip distribution, nucleation point, and source time function), whose values depend on the state of knowledge of the physical model driving the process. The probability density functions of the simulated ground-motion parameters, such as displacement response spectrum and peak ground velocity, are used to identify particular scenarios that match specific engineering requests.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cultrera, G., Cirella, A., Spagnuolo, E., Herrero, A., Tinti, E., Pacor, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Variability of Kinematic Source Parameters and Its Implication on the Choice of the Design Scenario [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>953</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>941</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/954?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Site- and Motion-Dependent Parametric Uncertainty of Site-Response Analyses in Earthquake Simulations [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/954?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We investigate the propagation of uncertainty in site-response analyses from the soil model parameters to the ground surface motion at three downhole array sites in the Los Angeles (LA) Basin. For this purpose, we develop realistic stochastic models of elastic and nonlinear dynamic soil properties using extensive site-specific and generic geotechnical data on the variability of soil properties. We also generate synthetic ground motions using a finite source dynamic rupture model over a wide range of magnitudes and distances and use this statistically significant number of ground motions in the analysis. For each of the three sites, we evaluate the effects of soil parameter uncertainty as a function of the seismic input intensity and frequency content. We show that the frequency range, where the ground-motion variability due to soil parameter uncertainty is maximized, is a function of both the site and the seismogram characteristics. We compare our results with previously published studies and show that different soil models, statistical descriptions of soil parameters, or ground-motion scenarios may yield substantial differences in the estimated site-response scatter. We conclude that the effects of nonlinear soil property uncertainties on the ground-motion variability strongly depend on the seismic motion intensity, and this dependency is more pronounced for soft soil profiles. By contrast, the effects of velocity profile uncertainties are less intensity dependent and more sensitive to the velocity impedance in the near surface that governs the maximum site amplification.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, W., Assimaki, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090030</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Site- and Motion-Dependent Parametric Uncertainty of Site-Response Analyses in Earthquake Simulations [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>968</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>954</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/969?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of Kinematic Constraints on Teleseismic Finite-Source Rupture Inversions: Great Peruvian Earthquakes of 23 June 2001 and 15 August 2007 [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/969?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Two great underthrusting earthquakes that occurred along the coast of Peru in 2001 and 2007 involve spatiotemporal slip distributions that differ from the predominantly unilateral or bilateral rupture expansion of many great events. Commonly used finite-source rupture model parameterizations, with specified rupture velocity and/or short duration of slip at each grid point applied to the seismic data for these two events, lead to incorrect slip-distributions or inaccurate estimation of rupture velocities as a result of intrinsic kinematic constraints imposed on the model slip distributions. Guided by large aperture array back projections of teleseismic broadband <I>P</I>-wave signals that image slip locations without imposing <I>a priori</I> kinematic constraints on the rupture process, we exploit the availability of large global broadband body and surface wave data sets to consider the effects of varying the kinematic constraints in teleseismic finite-source waveform inversions. By allowing longer than usual rupture durations at each point on the fault using a flexible subfault source-time function parameterization, we find that the anomalous attributes of the 2001 and 2007 Peru earthquake ruptures are readily recognized and accounted for by compound rupture models. The great 23 June 2001 (<I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB> 8.4&nbsp;8.4) earthquake involved an initial modest-size event that appears to have triggered a much larger secondary event about 120&nbsp;km away that developed an overall slip distribution with significant slip located back along the megathrust in the vicinity of the initial rupture. The great 15 August 2007 (<I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB> 8.0&nbsp;8.0) earthquake was also a composite event, with a modest size initial rupture followed by a 60-sec delayed larger rupture that initiated ~50&ndash;60 km away and spread up-dip and bilaterally. When back projections indicate greater rupture complexity than captured in a simple slip-pulse-type rupture model, one should allow for possible long-subfault slip-duration or composite triggered sequences, and not overly constrain the earthquake slip distribution.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lay, T., Ammon, C. J., Hutko, A. R., Kanamori, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090274</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of Kinematic Constraints on Teleseismic Finite-Source Rupture Inversions: Great Peruvian Earthquakes of 23 June 2001 and 15 August 2007 [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>994</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>969</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/995?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tsunami Simulations of the 1867 Virgin Island Earthquake: Constraints on Epicenter Location and Fault Parameters [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/995?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The 18 November 1867 Virgin Island earthquake and the tsunami that closely followed caused considerable loss of life and damage in several places in the northeast Caribbean region. The earthquake was likely a manifestation of the complex tectonic deformation of the Anegada Passage, which cuts across the Antilles island arc between the Virgin Islands and the Lesser Antilles. In this article, we attempt to characterize the 1867 earthquake with respect to fault orientation, rake, dip, fault dimensions, and first tsunami wave propagating phase, using tsunami simulations that employ high-resolution multibeam bathymetry. In addition, we present new geophysical and geological observations from the region of the suggested earthquake source. Results of our tsunami simulations based on relative amplitude comparison limit the earthquake source to be along the northern wall of the Virgin Islands basin, as suggested by <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf23">Reid and Taber (1920)</cross-ref>, or on the carbonate platform north of the basin, and not in the Virgin Islands basin, as commonly assumed. The numerical simulations suggest the 1867 fault was striking 120&deg;&ndash;135&deg; and had a mixed normal and left-lateral motion. First propagating wave phase analysis suggests a fault striking 300&deg;&ndash;315&deg; is also possible. The best-fitting rupture length was found to be relatively small (50&nbsp;km), probably indicating the earthquake had a moment magnitude of ~7.2. Detailed multibeam echo sounder surveys of the Anegada Passage bathymetry between St. Croix and St. Thomas reveal a scarp, which cuts the northern wall of the Virgin Islands basin. High-resolution seismic profiles further indicate it to be a reasonable fault candidate. However, the fault orientation and the orientation of other subparallel faults in the area are more compatible with right-lateral motion. For the other possible source region, no clear disruption in the bathymetry or seismic profiles was found on the carbonate platform north of the basin.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barkan, R., ten Brink, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090211</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tsunami Simulations of the 1867 Virgin Island Earthquake: Constraints on Epicenter Location and Fault Parameters [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1009</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>995</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1010?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On the Geologic Structure at the Epicenter of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquake [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1010?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The study focuses on evidence of Cenozoic faulting in the epicentral area of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake and its connection with Mesozoic structure. The seismic data consist of several reflection profiles collected near Summerville, South Carolina, in the period 1975&ndash;1983. Reprocessing of the data reveals an extensive early Mesozoic extensional basin, approximately 20&nbsp;km in width, between Summerville and Charleston. The basin is delineated by the geometry of reflections that image early Mesozoic volcanic and sedimentary rocks and by positive magnetic and gravity anomalies. Cenozoic compressional reactivation of Mesozoic extensional faults is imaged in the interior of the basin. The northwestern boundary of the basin is marked by a sharp gradient in the magnetic field. Folded Cretaceous and Tertiary Atlantic Coastal Plain sediments in association with diffractions and truncated reflections from the early Mesozoic section at four locations along this magnetic gradient indicate that the northwestern basin boundary is faulted. Instrumentally located earthquakes are clustered at the location of the faults imaged in the interior of the basin and in proximity to the northwestern basin margin. Modeling of magnetic and gravity data indicates that the upper crust beneath the seismically imaged structural basin is composed largely of mafic rocks to a depth of at least 4&nbsp;km. We propose that the Charleston earthquake occurred due to compressional reactivation of a Mesozoic fault in a localized zone of intense early Mesozoic continental rifting.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chapman, M. C., Beale, J. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090231</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On the Geologic Structure at the Epicenter of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquake [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1030</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1010</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1031?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Seismotectonics and Fault Structure of the California Central Coast [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1031?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>I present and interpret new earthquake relocations and focal mechanisms for the California Central Coast. The relocations improve upon catalog locations by using 3D seismic velocity models to account for lateral variations in structure and by using relative arrival times from waveform cross-correlation and double-difference methods to image seismicity features more sharply. Focal mechanisms are computed using ray tracing in the 3D velocity models. Seismicity alignments on the Hosgri fault confirm that it is vertical down to at least 12&nbsp;km depth, and the focal mechanisms are consistent with right-lateral strike-slip motion on a vertical fault. A prominent, newly observed feature is an ~25&nbsp;km long linear trend of seismicity running just offshore and parallel to the coastline in the region of Point Buchon, informally named the Shoreline fault. This seismicity trend is accompanied by a linear magnetic anomaly, and both the seismicity and the magnetic anomaly end where they obliquely meet the Hosgri fault. Focal mechanisms indicate that the Shoreline fault is a vertical strike-slip fault. Several seismicity lineations with vertical strike-slip mechanisms are observed in Estero Bay. Events greater than about 10&nbsp;km depth in Estero Bay, however, exhibit reverse-faulting mechanisms, perhaps reflecting slip at the top of the remnant subducted slab. Strike-slip mechanisms are observed offshore along the Hosgri&ndash;San Simeon fault system and onshore along the West Huasna and Rinconada faults, while reverse mechanisms are generally confined to the region between these two systems. This suggests a model in which the reverse faulting is primarily due to restraining left-transfer of right-lateral slip.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hardebeck, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090307</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Seismotectonics and Fault Structure of the California Central Coast [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1050</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1031</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1051?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Single- and Multigrain Luminescence Dating of Sediments Related to the Greenville Fault, Eastern San Francisco Bay Area, California [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1051?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Near urban areas and extending ~60 km along the eastern margin of the Livermore Valley, the Greenville fault is the easternmost right-lateral strike-slip fault of the San Andreas system in the greater San Francisco Bay area. Notwithstanding the 1980 Livermore earthquake sequence (mainshock <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB>&nbsp;5.9) on the Greenville fault, there is no record of recency or of Holocene rates of activity on the Greenville fault, yet this fault exhibits clear geomorphic evidence of late Quaternary faulting. In trenches parallel and normal to the fault through alluvial fan deposits at the Laughlin Road site only pedogenic carbonate was available for <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="1051eq1"></inline-fig></f> dating. Therefore, we applied several photon-stimulated luminescence (PSL) sediment-dating procedures to the silt and sand fractions of six samples. The polymineral-fine-silt multi-aliquot age estimates are generally inaccurate, but the single-grain quartz (SGQ) and multigrain quartz single-aliquot regenerative-dose (SAR) ages from sand grains are in stratigraphic sequence. In trench 3A these SAR ages range from 125&plusmn;11 yrs (before 2007) within the topmost unit L to 13.45&plusmn;0.79 ka in the base of the lowermost channel-fill unit G. The SAR PSL results demonstrate the importance of the use of SGQ dating for such sediments and provide the first numerical ages used to constrain the slip rate on the Greenville fault. Trench exposures reveal that unit G is an alluvial sequence infilling a paleochannel offset in a right-lateral sense along the northern Greenville fault. Age estimates from upper and middle unit G bracket deposition of subunit Gb are between 11.12&plusmn;0.55 ka and 10.64&plusmn;0.85 ka and those from middle and lower unit G bracket deposition of subunit Go are between 11.12&plusmn;0.55 ka and 13.45&plusmn;0.79 ka. These SAR PSL age estimates and measurements of the lateral offset constrain a preliminary slip-rate estimate to about 2 mm/yr or higher for the northern Greenville fault zone.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berger, G. W., Sawyer, T. L., Unruh, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090310</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Single- and Multigrain Luminescence Dating of Sediments Related to the Greenville Fault, Eastern San Francisco Bay Area, California [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1072</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1051</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1073?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Focal Depth Determination for Moderate and Small Earthquakes by Modeling Regional Depth Phases sPg, sPmP, and sPn [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1073?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>There are three usable regional depth phases, <I>sPg</I>, <I>sPmP</I>, and <I>sPn</I>, and their corresponding reference phases, <I>Pg</I>, <I>PmP</I>, and <I>Pn</I>. The differential time between each depth phase and its reference phase can be used to estimate earthquake focal depth. We have developed a method to determine focal depth for moderate and small earthquakes by using a regional depth-phase modeling (RDPM) method. We used a default focal mechanism to generate the differential times for all earthquakes. To estimate the reliability of the modeled focal depths, we compared our solutions with those obtained by other methods and found the consistency is good. Because the focal depths estimated by RDPM are model dependent, we tested the extent of the dependency and found that a 10% error in the crustal model may generate a 10%&ndash;15% error in the modeled depth. The absolute error is determined by the error in the crustal model and the focal depth itself. We found that earthquake location errors have only a small effect on the modeled focal depths. By analyzing synthetic and observed waveforms, we found a distance window within which <I>sPmP</I> and <I>PmP</I> are well developed, and, within the window, the <I>P</I> portion of the waveform is relatively simple and <I>sPmP</I> and <I>PmP</I> are easy to identify. We also demonstrated that the assumptions of <I>sPmP</I> and <I>PmP</I> are correct, that regional depth phases are not developed or not discernible in some regions, and that regional depth phases have special features that can be used to identify those phases.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ma, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090103</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Focal Depth Determination for Moderate and Small Earthquakes by Modeling Regional Depth Phases sPg, sPmP, and sPn [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1088</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1073</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1089?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rupture Directivity Characteristics of the 2003 Big Bear Sequence [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1089?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We have developed a forward modeling technique to retrieve rupture characteristics of small earthquakes (3&lt;<I>M</I>&lt;5), including rupture propagation direction, fault dimension, and rupture speed. The technique is based on an empirical Green&rsquo;s function (EGF) approach, where we use data from collocated smaller events as Green&rsquo;s functions to study the bigger events. We tend to choose smaller events with similar focal mechanisms for EGFs; however, we show that the events with different focal mechanisms can work equally well when corrected for radiation pattern effect. Compared to deconvolution, this forward modeling approach allows full use of both the shape and amplitude information produced by rupture propagation. Assuming a simple 1D source model, we parameterize the source time function of a target event as the convolution of two boxcars, featuring the rise time <I></I><SUB><I>r</I></SUB> and the rupture time <I></I><SUB><I>c</I></SUB>; we solve for <I></I><SUB><I>r</I></SUB> and <I></I><SUB><I>c</I></SUB> in a grid search manner by minimizing the waveform misfit between the three-component data and the synthetics constructed from the EGFs. The rupture propagation direction, fault length, and rupture speed can then be estimated by fitting the observed azimuthal pattern of <I></I><SUB><I>c</I></SUB> from <I>P</I> and <I>S</I> waves. We apply the approach to the 12 largest events (<I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&ge;3.3) of the 2003 Big Bear sequence (excluding the mainshock) in southern California. Among them, seven events are found to exhibit robust rupture directivity. The fact that the ruptures of these events propagate in all directions reveals complicated fault geometry at depth. We compute the stress drop <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="1089eq1"></inline-fig></f> for each event using the resolved fault length. The results show large variations ranging from ~1 to 90&nbsp;Mpa, with no dependence on moment. However, <I></I> appears inversely correlated with rupture speed <I>V</I><SUB><I>r</I></SUB>; in particular, events with larger <I></I> tend to propagate at smaller <I>V</I><SUB><I>r</I></SUB>, whereas events with smaller <I></I> propagate faster.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tan, Y., Helmberger, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090074</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rupture Directivity Characteristics of the 2003 Big Bear Sequence [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1106</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1089</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1107?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rupture Directivity of Moderate Earthquakes in Northern California [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1107?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We invert peak ground velocity and acceleration (PGV and PGA) to estimate rupture direction and rupture velocity for 47 moderate earthquakes (3.5&ge;<I>M</I>&ge;5.4) in northern California. We correct sets of PGAs and PGVs recorded at stations less than 55&ndash;125&nbsp;km, depending on source depth, for site amplification and source&ndash;receiver distance, then fit the residual peak motions to the unilateral directivity function of <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf2">Ben-Menahem (1961)</cross-ref>. We independently invert PGA and PGV. The rupture direction can be determined using as few as seven peak motions if the station distribution is sufficient. The rupture velocity is unstable, however, if there are no takeoff angles within 30&deg; of the rupture direction. Rupture velocities are generally subsonic (0.5<I>&beta;</I>&ndash;0.9<I>&beta;</I>); for stability, we limit the rupture velocity at <I>v</I>=0.92<I>&beta;</I>, the Rayleigh wave speed. For 73 of 94 inversions, the rupture direction clearly identifies one of the nodal planes as the fault plane. The 35 strike-slip earthquakes have rupture directions that range from nearly horizontal (6 events) to directly updip (5 events); the other 24 rupture partly along strike and partly updip. Two strike-slip earthquakes rupture updip in one inversion and downdip in the other. All but 1 of the 11 thrust earthquakes rupture predominantly updip. We compare the rupture directions for 10 <I>M</I>&ge;4.0 earthquakes to the relative location of the mainshock and the first two weeks of aftershocks. Spatial distributions of 8 of 10 aftershock sequences agree well with the rupture directivity calculated for the mainshock.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seekins, L. C., Boatwright, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090161</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rupture Directivity of Moderate Earthquakes in Northern California [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1119</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1120?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The 20 January 2007 Odaesan, Korea, Earthquake Sequence: Reactivation of a Buried Strike-Slip Fault? [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1120?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;4.6 Odaesan, Korea, earthquake of 20 January 2007 (11&nbsp;hr 56&nbsp;min) had nine locatable foreshocks in the previous 67&nbsp;hours and nine aftershocks during the 11&nbsp;hours after the main event. We obtained accurate locations of this sequence by employing the double-difference earthquake relocation method with differential travel-time measurements using waveform cross-correlation. We found that 19 accurately relocated foreshocks, mainshock, and aftershocks aligned along a 1.2&nbsp;km long lineation with an azimuth of west-northwest&ndash;east-southeast (115&deg;), which coincides with a nodal plane of the mainshock focal mechanism that strikes 114&deg;. Regional waveform modeling of the mainshock constrained a focal depth of 11&plusmn;1 km and the focal mechanism is a pure strike-slip faulting along the vertical nodal planes with a horizontal <I>P</I> axis (plunge=1&deg;) trending east-northeast (69&deg;). The pulse rise time of the mainshock source time function estimated from an empirical Green&rsquo;s function analysis ranges from 0.1 to 0.16&nbsp;sec, which yields a source radius of ~0.6 km and is consistent with the spatial distribution of the foreshock and aftershock sequences. The stress drop of <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="1120eq1"></inline-fig></f> is obtained for the mainshock using a radius of 0.6&nbsp;km for a circular rupture, and seismic moment <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="1120eq2"></inline-fig></f>. The 20 January 2007, Odaesan earthquake may be the first significant earthquake in southern Korea to date where the fault plane is constrained by accurate locations of the foreshock and aftershock sequences. Its source mechanism, vertical strike-slip fault at depth, suggests that the event represents reactivation of a buried high-angle fault in the Precambrian basement by the contemporary east&ndash;east-northeast trending regional horizontal compressive stress.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, W. Y., Choi, H., Noh, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The 20 January 2007 Odaesan, Korea, Earthquake Sequence: Reactivation of a Buried Strike-Slip Fault? [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1137</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1120</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1138?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On the Increase of Background Seismicity Rate during the 1997-1998 Umbria-Marche, Central Italy, Sequence: Apparent Variation or Fluid-Driven Triggering? [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1138?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We investigate the temporal evolution of background seismicity rate in the Umbria-Marche sector of the northern Apennines that was struck by the 1997&ndash;1998 Colfiorito seismic sequence. Specifically, we apply the Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequences (ETAS) model to separate the background seismicity rate from the coseismic triggered rate of earthquake production. Analyzed data are extracted from the <I>Catalogo della Sismicit&agrave; Italiana</I> (CSI1.1, catalog of Italian seismicity) 1981&ndash;2002, which contains for the study area 12.163 events with <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB>&gt;1.5. The capability of the ETAS model to match the observed seismicity rate is tested by analyzing the model residuals and by applying two nonparametric statistical tests (the runs and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests) to verify the fit of residuals to Poisson hypothesis. We first apply the ETAS model to the seismicity that occurred in the study area during the whole period covered by the CSI1.1 catalog. Our results show that the ETAS model does not explain the temporal evolution of seismicity in a time interval defined by change points identified from time-evolution of residuals and encompassing the Colfiorito seismic sequence. We therefore restrict our analysis to this period and analyze only those events belonging to the 1997&ndash;1998 seismic sequence. We again obtain the inadequacy of a stationary ETAS model with constant background rate to reproduce the temporal pattern of observed seismicity. We verify that the failure of the ETAS model to fit the observed data is caused by the increase of the background seismicity rate associated with the repeated Colfiorito mainshocks. We interpret the inferred increase of background rate as a consequence of the perturbation to the coseismic stress field caused by fluid flow and/or pore-pressure relaxation. In particular, we show that the transient perturbation caused by poroelastic relaxation can explain the temporal increase of background rate that therefore represents a fluid signal in the seismicity pattern.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lombardi, A. M., Cocco, M., Marzocchi, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090077</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On the Increase of Background Seismicity Rate during the 1997-1998 Umbria-Marche, Central Italy, Sequence: Apparent Variation or Fluid-Driven Triggering? [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1152</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1138</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1153?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Long-Lasting Aftershock Series of the 3 May 1887 Mw 7.5 Sonora Earthquake in the Mexican Basin and Range Province [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1153?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We study local and regional body-wave arrival times from several seismic networks to better define the active regional fault pattern in the epicentral region of the 3 May 1887 <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;7.5 Sonora, Mexico (southern Basin and Range Province) earthquake. We determine hypocenter coordinates of earthquakes that originated between 2003 and 2007 from arrival times recorded by the local network RESNES (Red S&iacute;smica del Noreste de Sonora) and stations of the Network of Autonomously Recording Seismographs (NARS)&ndash;Baja array. For events between April and December 2007, we also incorporated arrival times from USArray stations located within 150&nbsp;km of the United States&ndash;Mexico border. We first obtained preliminary earthquake locations with the Hypoinverse program (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf14">Klein, 2002</cross-ref>) and then relocated these initial hypocenter coordinates with the source-specific station term (SSST) method (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf17">Lin and Shearer, 2005</cross-ref>). Most relocated epicenters cluster in the upper crust near the faults that ruptured during the 1887 earthquake and can be interpreted to be part of its long-lasting series of aftershocks. The region of aftershock activity extends, along the same fault zone, 40&ndash;50&nbsp;km south of the documented southern tip of the 1887 rupture and includes faults in the epicentral region of the 17 May 1913 (<I>I</I><SUB>max</SUB> VIII, <I>M</I><SUB>I</SUB>&nbsp;5.0&ndash;0.4) and 18 December 1923 (<I>I</I><SUB>max</SUB> IX, <I>M</I><SUB>I</SUB>&nbsp;5.7&ndash;0.4) Granados&ndash;Hu&aacute;sabas, Sonora, earthquakes, which themselves are likely to be aftershocks of the 1887 event. The long aftershock duration can be explained by the unusually large magnitude of the mainshock and by the low slip rates and long mainshock recurrence times of the faults that ruptured in 1887.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castro, R. R., Shearer, P. M., Astiz, L., Suter, M., Jacques-Ayala, C., Vernon, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090180</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Long-Lasting Aftershock Series of the 3 May 1887 Mw 7.5 Sonora Earthquake in the Mexican Basin and Range Province [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1164</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1165?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Frequency-Magnitude Characteristics Down to Magnitude -4.4 for Induced Seismicity Recorded at Mponeng Gold Mine, South Africa [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1165?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article aims to investigate the frequency-magnitude characteristics and lower magnitude limits of the microseismic catalog recorded with a seismic network sensitive to high frequencies at Mponeng mine, South Africa. The network, composed of one three-component accelerometer and eight acoustic emission sensors, is located at a depth of 3.5&nbsp;km below the surface and covers the limited volume of approximately 300<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>300<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>300 m. The three-component accelerometer was used to estimate the moment magnitude for the limited number of 135 events (<I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB> ranged from -4.1 to -0.3) well recorded by the network. We use the relation between the moment magnitude estimated from accelerometer data and radiated energy/moment magnitude estimated from acoustic emission sensors to extend the catalog to lower magnitudes. The magnitude of completeness of selected spatiotemporal subsets of the catalog was estimated for: (1)&nbsp;an aftershock sequence of an <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;1.9 event that occurred approximately 30&nbsp;m from the network, and (2)&nbsp;postblasting activity during working days, located more than 80&nbsp;m from the network. The data follow the Gutenberg&ndash;Richter (GR) frequency-magnitude relationship with no visible deviation from self-similar behavior of seismicity between <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB> -4.4 and -1.9 for the aftershock sequence and between -3.5 and -1.5 for the postblasting dataset. We estimated the magnitude of completeness of selected subset as low as -4.3 (<I>b</I>=1.26) for the aftershock sequence and -3.4 (<I>b</I>=1.17) for the postblasting activity. Differences in magnitude of completeness are attributed to location of recorded activity and site effects.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kwiatek, G., Plenkers, K., Nakatani, M., Yabe, Y., Dresen, G., JAGUARS-Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090277</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Frequency-Magnitude Characteristics Down to Magnitude -4.4 for Induced Seismicity Recorded at Mponeng Gold Mine, South Africa [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1173</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1174?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Temporal and Spatial Variations of Local Magnitudes in Alaska and Aleutians and Comparison with Body-Wave and Moment Magnitudes [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1174?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We evaluated temporal and spatial variability of local magnitudes (<I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB>) in the earthquake catalog of Alaska Earthquake Information Center. Regionally recorded hypocenters in mainland Alaska are available in the catalog beginning in the early 1970s. No comprehensive Aleutian-wide <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB> statistics exist prior to the mid-1990s. We identify four time intervals with similar magnitude residual trends between <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB> versus body-wave magnitude <I>m</I><SUB><I>b</I></SUB>: 1971&ndash;1976, 1977&ndash;1989, 1990&ndash;1999.5, and 1999.5&ndash;2008. The three latter intervals are also identified in <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB> versus moment magnitude <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB> residual trends. These time intervals correspond to the periods with different data processing procedures. We find that the latest time interval has the best correspondence between <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB> and <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB> values in mainland Alaska, especially for shallow (depth&lt;40 km) earthquakes. Strong spatial variations in <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB> versus <I>m</I><SUB><I>b</I></SUB> and <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB> versus <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB> are present in the catalog. For the pre-1990 data, the largest discrepancies are observed for the Gulf of Alaska earthquakes. For the latest time period 1999.5&ndash;2008, the largest residuals between <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB> and <I>m</I><SUB><I>b</I></SUB> or <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB> are observed for the earthquakes located within the oceanic segment of the Aleutian arc and within 100&nbsp;km of the trench. We calculated a set of magnitude corrections for mainland Alaska and the Aleutians that need to be applied to homogenize magnitude values in the catalog in time and space.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruppert, N. A., Hansen, R. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090172</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Temporal and Spatial Variations of Local Magnitudes in Alaska and Aleutians and Comparison with Body-Wave and Moment Magnitudes [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1183</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1174</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1184?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Likelihood-Based Tests for Evaluating Space-Rate-Magnitude Earthquake Forecasts [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1184?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The five-year experiment of the Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM) working group was designed to compare several prospective forecasts of earthquake rates in latitude&ndash;longitude&ndash;magnitude bins in and around California. This forecast format is being used as a blueprint for many other earthquake predictability experiments around the world, and therefore it is important to consider how to evaluate the performance of such forecasts. Two tests that are currently used are based on the likelihood of the observed distribution of earthquakes given a forecast; one test compares the binned space&ndash;rate&ndash;magnitude observation and forecast, and the other compares only the rate forecast and the number of observed earthquakes. In this article, we discuss a subtle flaw in the current test of rate forecasts, and we propose two new tests that isolate the spatial and magnitude component, respectively, of a space&ndash;rate&ndash;magnitude forecast. For illustration, we consider the RELM forecasts and the distribution of earthquakes observed during the first half of the ongoing RELM experiment. We show that a space&ndash;rate&ndash;magnitude forecast may appear to be consistent with the distribution of observed earthquakes despite the spatial forecast being inconsistent with the spatial distribution of observed earthquakes, and we suggest that these new tests should be used to provide increased detail in earthquake forecast evaluation. We also discuss the statistical power of each of the likelihood-based tests and the stability (with respect to earthquake catalog uncertainties) of results from the likelihood-based tests.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zechar, J. D., Gerstenberger, M. C., Rhoades, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090192</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Likelihood-Based Tests for Evaluating Space-Rate-Magnitude Earthquake Forecasts [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1195</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1184</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1196?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Generation of Shear Waves from Explosions in Water-Filled Cavities [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1196?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We analyze shear waves from a 27&nbsp;kiloton nuclear explosion at 597&nbsp;m depth in salt at Azgir, Kazakhstan, and four subsequent small nuclear explosions in the water-filled cavity of the original explosion. We use local recordings on a common set of radial and vertical component instruments to identify the source of these shear waves. These small explosions caused minimal damage to the cavity walls and so are similar in some important ways to cavity decoupled explosions; however, the signal size is comparable to a tamped explosion. The shear wave amplitudes relative to <I>P</I> generated by the water-filled cavity explosions are comparable to each other and to the tamped explosion. Comparison of the water-filled cavity explosions&rsquo; <I>P</I> spectra with a distinct bubble pulse peak and two distinct <I>S</I> phases, which lack that spectral peak, indicates that the <I>S</I> phases are not scattered from <I>P</I>. The initial <I>S</I>-waves&rsquo; travel-time curve, impulsiveness, and compactness are consistent with generation at or very near the source and are inconsistent with significant scattering much outside the source volume. We estimate that the <I>S</I> waves are consistent with an <I>S</I>-wave source at the same depth and with the same moment as the spherical component of the explosion source. Nonlinear axisymmetric numerical modeling of the nonlinear deformation of the salt medium indicates that neither fracturing nor asphericity of the nonlinear region outside of the cavity, for a variety of source asymmetries, would produce the observed shear waves for any of the water-filled cavity explosions. Oscillations of the cavity itself due to variations in the amplitude and timing of the pressure around the cavity wall can, however, produce shear waves at the frequencies observed. Both offset of the source and asphericity of the cavity lead to such variations in pressure.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baker, G. E., Xu, H., Stevens, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080225</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Generation of Shear Waves from Explosions in Water-Filled Cavities [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1210</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1211?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Seismic Wave Gradiometry Using the Wavelet Transform: Application to the Analysis of Complex Surface Waves Recorded at the Glendora Array, Sullivan, Indiana, USA [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1211?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article describes a new development in seismic wave gradiometry. The work follows previous work on time-domain wave gradiometry but proposes applying a wavelet transform to the data prior to wave gradiometric analysis. The result is a more complete picture of wave attributes, which vary in time as well as frequency. In this article, the new data analysis approach is used to analyze two underwater shots that were recorded by a portion of the Glendora Array. The Glendora site is a former surface coal mine that has subsequently been filled by mine tailings and, as such, forms an artificial sedimentary basin in which the geometry is well known. The array used for the analysis was located in a corner formed by the intersection of two vertically oriented boundaries between mine tailings and the surrounding bedrock. The analysis of the data revealed the presence of typical body waves and surface waves, in addition to several phases that are interpreted to be (1)&nbsp;reflections of surface waves off of the vertical tailings&ndash;bedrock boundaries, (2)&nbsp;surface waves generated by the interaction of direct-arrival waterborne acoustic waves with the water&ndash;tailing interface (the lake shore), and (3)&nbsp;the interaction of other waterborne acoustic waves in Glendora Lake with other water&ndash;tailing interfaces. The surface waves are highly time dependent and frequency dependent and highlight the extreme complexity of surface wave propagation in geologically complex areas.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poppeliers, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090304</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Seismic Wave Gradiometry Using the Wavelet Transform: Application to the Analysis of Complex Surface Waves Recorded at the Glendora Array, Sullivan, Indiana, USA [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1224</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1211</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1225?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Influence of the 3D Distribution of Q and Crustal Structure on Ground Motions from the 2003 Mw 7.2 Fiordland, New Zealand, Earthquake [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1225?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;7.2 earthquake of 21 August 2003 provides an unprecedented opportunity to evaluate the applicability of the New Zealand acceleration response spectrum attenuation model (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf22">McVerry <I>et&nbsp;al.</I>, 2006</cross-ref>) in the Fiordland region and to consider effects from 3D <I>Q</I> heterogeneity. This was the largest shallow earthquake in New Zealand in the past 40&nbsp;yrs. It was well recorded by the GeoNet seismograph and strong-motion network. We compare the observed 5% damped response spectral accelerations (SAs) to the New Zealand model values, for both crustal reverse and subduction interface earthquakes. On average, both models underpredict the observed SAs, by approximately 0.4 in lnSA, for 0&ndash;400&nbsp;km distance; however, the data show great variability. Using the South Island 3D <I>Q</I> model, we compute the path-averaged attenuation rate, <I>CQ</I> for synthetic Fiordland hypocenters to distributed sites. Compared to the standard model, the relatively high <I>Q</I> in South Island produces lower attenuation rates, although the low-<I>Q</I> crustal root of the Southern Alps produces a 10 times greater attenuation rate for certain paths. The average attenuation rate estimated from the SA data is similar to <I>CQ</I> for frequencies &lt;5 Hz and constant above 5&nbsp;Hz. For an acceleration model for Fiordland earthquakes, 0&ndash;60&nbsp;km depth, an applicable anelastic attenuation rate is the mean <I>CQ</I> from the synthetic hypocenters, which is 0.006 km<sup>-1</sup> at 2.5&nbsp;Hz. For the observed SAs, the most significant regional effect is high relative SAs at some sites that may be due to postcritical Moho reflections from the Southern Alps crustal root.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eberhart-Phillips, D., McVerry, G., Reyners, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090148</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Influence of the 3D Distribution of Q and Crustal Structure on Ground Motions from the 2003 Mw 7.2 Fiordland, New Zealand, Earthquake [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1240</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1225</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1241?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of 3D Attenuation on Seismic Wave Amplitude and Phase Measurements [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1241?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We incorporate 3D anelastic attenuation into the spectral-element method for seismic wave propagation. This advancement accommodates lateral variations in anelasticity on global, regional, or local scales. We use the method to investigate the effects of anelasticity in an upper mantle attenuation model in conjunction with a global wave-speed model and in a regional subduction zone model. These investigations reveal substantial and competing amplitude anomalies due to elastic and anelastic variations, but rather minor anelastic effects on the travel times of seismic waves. Seismic studies utilizing amplitude data must therefore consider elastic and anelastic heterogeneity in tandem to avoid mapping one type of heterogeneity into the other.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Savage, B., Komatitsch, D., Tromp, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090263</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of 3D Attenuation on Seismic Wave Amplitude and Phase Measurements [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1251</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1241</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1252?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Real-Time Ground-Motion Analysis: Distinguishing P and S Arrivals in a Noisy Environment [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1252?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Particle motion analysis by recursive singular value decomposition is used to distinguish basic seismic phases online from a stream of three-component data with sample-to-sample resolution. This article describes a real-time method for implementation on a three-component seismometer with limited computing resources. It is proposed that the use of instruments equipped with the suggested phase detecting capabilities would provide the basic components of an earthquake or a tsunami early warning system.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosenberger, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090265</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Real-Time Ground-Motion Analysis: Distinguishing P and S Arrivals in a Noisy Environment [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1262</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1252</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1263?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On the Stability and Reproducibility of the Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratios on Ambient Noise: Case Study of Cavola, Northern Italy [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1263?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios using ambient noise (HVNSR) are commonly used in site effects studies. In the practice, many operators assume stability over time of HVNSR and base their analyses on few very short time windows. The availability of a long period of continuous microtremor recording allowed us to analyze three months of data coming from a dense array experiment performed at Cavola, a village in northern Apennines. This condition offers a good opportunity to check the validity of the stability assumption and to investigate variations of the local ambient noise wave-field composition. The Cavola site is characterized by landslide sediments over stiffer materials with a moderate impedance contrast and by a complex morphology. An intense industrial activity in the village contributes to the generation of seismic noise. After identifying this noise source in the time series, we evaluate its effects on HVNSR. The results indicate that the spectral peak of HVNSR varies in amplitude and frequency, posing a warning about stability in time. Analyzing the spectra we identify the anthropic activity as responsible for changes in the composition of the noise wave field. These variations affect HVNSR, including peak frequency and also ground-motion polarization.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cara, F., Di Giulio, G., Milana, G., Bordoni, P., Haines, J., Rovelli, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090086</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On the Stability and Reproducibility of the Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratios on Ambient Noise: Case Study of Cavola, Northern Italy [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1275</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1263</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1276?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Inversion Analysis of Site Responses in the Kanto Basin Using Data from a Dense Strong Motion Seismograph Array [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1276?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We applied nonlinear inversion analysis to estimate site response in the Kanto area using data from 19 moderate-sized earthquakes observed at the 843 stations constituting strong motion accelerograph networks of the Seismic Kanto strong motion network (SK-net), K-NET, and KiK-net. We determined the source parameters (seismic moment, <I>M</I><SUB>0</SUB>; corner frequency, <I>f</I><SUB><I>c</I></SUB>) for each event and the quality factor (<I>Q</I>(<I>f</I>)) for the propagation path based on borehole records. We also determined the frequency-independent and reference-independent site responses. The resulting seismic moments are in good agreement with those determined by the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED) and are proportional to <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="1276eq1"></inline-fig></f>. We found a frequency-dependent quality factor for the propagation path: <I>Q</I>(<I>f</I>)=107<I>f</I><sup>0.52</sup>. The site responses, averaged over 0.5&ndash;1.0&nbsp;Hz, correlate well with shear-wave velocities for the upper 30&nbsp;m (AVS30; correlation coefficient of -0.63) and with depth to the seismic basement, the shear-wave velocity of which is around 3.0 km/sec. Large site responses are found in areas of unconsolidated sediments, such as swampy land. The predominant frequencies of our site responses roughly agree with those of the horizontal to vertical (H/V) spectral ratio. This indicates that the H/V ratio is valid for estimating predominant frequencies of <I>S</I>-wave amplification.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tsuda, K., Koketsu, K., Hisada, Y., Hayakawa, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090153</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Inversion Analysis of Site Responses in the Kanto Basin Using Data from a Dense Strong Motion Seismograph Array [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1287</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1276</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1288?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nonlinear Site Response Effects on the Standard Deviations of Predicted Ground Motions [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1288?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Soil nonlinearity has been widely accepted for the estimation of median ground motion, but its effects on the ground-motion standard deviations have not. In particular, the impact of soil nonlinearity on the interevent standard deviation of predicted ground motions has been misunderstood. In this article, we show that, for the prediction of ground motions on soil site conditions, both the intraevent and interevent standard deviations are impacted by soil nonlinear response. We also present the various approaches for accounting for soil nonlinearity in the variability of predicted ground motions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Atik, L., Abrahamson, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090154</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nonlinear Site Response Effects on the Standard Deviations of Predicted Ground Motions [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1292</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1288</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1293?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ground Motions Underground Compared to Those on the Surface: A Case Study from Sudbury, Ontario [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1293?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We compare signals recorded on hard-rock seismographic stations in Sudbury, Ontario, to those recorded in caverns below the surface stations, in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. Signals from shallow local events show strong apparent amplification of ground motion observed on the surface relative to those recorded at depths of 1.4&ndash;2.1&nbsp;km; the amplification peaks near 2.1&nbsp;Hz, where it is on average a factor of 3 to 5. The peak narrows, decreases in amplitude, and shifts toward lower frequencies (0.8&ndash;1&nbsp;Hz) for regional and teleseismic events. The peak in apparent amplification for the local events is attributed to a strong <I>Rg</I> phase from shallow events at close distances. The frequency shift and decay of the amplitude of this peak for more distant events reflects the rapidly-diminishing influence of the higher-frequency components of this phase with distance, coupled with the increasing importance of shear-wave phases.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atkinson, G. M., Kraeva, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090197</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ground Motions Underground Compared to Those on the Surface: A Case Study from Sudbury, Ontario [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1305</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1293</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1306?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Surface Motion of a Half-Space with Triangular and Semicircular Hills under Incident SH Waves [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1306?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Wave propagation in a half-space with complex surface configuration is often encountered in fields like seismology and ocean engineering. This article presents a theoretical study of multiple scattering of <I>SH</I> waves by two hills of different geometries (a triangle and a semicircle) on a solid half-space. The standing waves in the triangular and semicircular hills are constructed by the fractional-order Bessel function method and Fourier integral transform method, respectively. The unknown coefficients of the standing waves are determined via the region-matching method. It is shown that the apexes of the hills are very sensitive to the external dynamic load because of multiple incidences; in particular, the apex of the triangular hill exhibiting maximum amplitude is most susceptible to the external load. Furthermore, the effect of the interaction between the triangular and semicircular hills is evaluated. It is found that the amplitudes on the showdown zone that connects the two hills have been largely amplified due to the interaction between the two hills. The mutual interaction between the hills should not be neglected if the distance between them is less than O(100) times the typical dimension of the hill.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, G., Chen, H., Liu, D., Khoo, B. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090273</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Surface Motion of a Half-Space with Triangular and Semicircular Hills under Incident SH Waves [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1319</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1306</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1320?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Macrozonation of Tamil Nadu in Southern India [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1320?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The south Indian state of Tamil Nadu in the peninsular shield is a zone of low to moderate seismic activity with a sparse historical record of significant earthquakes. The current intensity-based zoning adopted by the Indian seismic code stipulates an effective peak ground acceleration (PGA) of either 0.10 or 0.16<I>g</I> for different parts of the state, for the maximum considered earthquake (MCE), and the service life of a structure. In the current study, probabilistic seismic hazard contour maps for Tamil Nadu and the union territory of Pondicherry, in terms of the ground-motion parameters, PGA and spectral accelerations, at 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0&nbsp;sec for 2%, 5%, and 10% probabilities of exceedance in a 50&nbsp;yr period, have been produced. Hazard computations have been performed over a grid of sites covering the territory at an interval of 0.2&deg;. A comprehensive earthquake catalog has been compiled for the region extending between 2 and 20.7&deg;&nbsp;N latitude and 68 and 88&deg;&nbsp;E longitude and spanning ~950 yrs. The hazard maps are produced by suitably accounting for epistemic uncertainty in the hazard computations within a logic-tree framework incorporating parameters such as different probabilistic hazard analysis methods (classical Cornell&ndash;McGuire and zone-free approaches), catalog completeness estimation methods, maximum cutoff magnitude, and ground-motion predictive equations for shallow crustal intraplate environments. The hazard maps are compared to the zoning prescribed by the seismic code. The current estimations show that the potential seismic hazard in considerable parts of the state is underestimated by the broad zoning adopted by the Indian Standards.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Menon, A., Ornthammarath, T., Corigliano, M., Lai, C. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090071</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Macrozonation of Tamil Nadu in Southern India [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1341</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1320</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1342?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reverse Propagation of Surface Waves Reflected from Seamounts in the Northwestern Pacific [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1342?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The reverse propagation of a surface wave traveling through the Japanese Islands from southwest to northeast was detected for major shallow earthquakes that occurred in northeastern Japan. The wave is predominant in the transverse component, having a period of 20&nbsp;sec and lasting longer than 200&nbsp;sec. The propagation velocity is around 3.8 km/sec, which is characteristic of a typical surface wave. Semblance analysis using a dense seismograph network shows that the wave was generated near the Kyushu-Palau ridge southeast of Kyushu Island. Numerical simulation with a 3D finite-element method can explain the surface-wave reflection predominant in the transverse component as reflection from seamounts with a crustal root 10&nbsp;km deeper than the Moho discontinuity at the surrounding ocean floor. The observed long duration of the reverse-propagating surface wave might represent the superposition of a reflected wave from other seamounts and/or the thick sedimentary layer along the Nankai trough.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obara, K., Matsumura, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090291</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reverse Propagation of Surface Waves Reflected from Seamounts in the Northwestern Pacific [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1349</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1342</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1350?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Short-Period Rayleigh-Wave Group Velocity Tomography through Ambient Noise Cross-Correlation in Xinjiang, Northwest China [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1350?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>High-quality, short-period Rayleigh-wave group velocity tomography is conducted through ambient noise cross-correlation among 54 stations in the newly upgraded Xinjiang Provincial Digital Seismic Network in northwest China. The velocity maps obtained in this study give more details in most parts of Xinjiang than previous surface wave studies that mostly focused on large scale patterns in Eurasia, Asia, or the whole of China. The tomography results have a high correlation with the major tectonic and geological features in the study area. In general, low velocities are associated with the two basins, and high velocities are associated with the two mountain belts in the Xinjiang area. The southernmost part of the Tianshan mountains has the same velocity structure as that of the neighboring part of the Tarim Basin, implying that they may have the same crustal composition. The velocity in the Tarim Basin is spatially inhomogeneous, due to the fact that it comprises several sub-blocks that have different thickness of sediments and crustal layers. In the Dzungaria Basin, as the period becomes longer, the low-velocity zone shrinks toward the south, reflecting the fact that the sediments and the upper crust in the southern part of the Dzungaria Basin are thicker than in the northern part.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zheng, X., Jiao, W., Zhang, C., Wang, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090225</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Short-Period Rayleigh-Wave Group Velocity Tomography through Ambient Noise Cross-Correlation in Xinjiang, Northwest China [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1355</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1350</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1356?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Temporal Variations in Crustal Scattering Structure near Parkfield, California, Using Receiver Functions [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1356?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We investigate temporal variations in teleseismic receiver functions using 11&nbsp;yr of data at station PKD near Parkfield, California, by stacking power spectral density (PSD) functions within 12-month windows. We find that PSD levels for both radial and transverse components drop by ~5 dB following the 2003 San Simeon (<I>M</I>&nbsp;6.5) earthquake, with a persistent reduction in background levels of ~2 dB, relative to the pre-2003 levels, after the 2004 Parkfield (<I>M</I>&nbsp;6) earthquake, corresponding to an estimated decrease in shear-wave velocity of ~0.12 and <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="1356eq1"></inline-fig></f>, respectively, or equivalent negative changes in Poisson&rsquo;s ratio of ~0.02 and ~0.01. Our results suggest that the perturbation originates at middle to lower crustal levels, possibly caused by the redistribution of crustal pore fluids, consistent with increased and sustained tremor activity near Parkfield following both earthquakes. This study shows that we can resolve temporal variations in crustal scattering structure near a major seismogenic fault using the receiver function method.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Audet, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090299</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Temporal Variations in Crustal Scattering Structure near Parkfield, California, Using Receiver Functions [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1362</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1356</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1363?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Basement Imaging Using Sp Converted Phases from a Dense Strong-Motion Array in Lan-Yang Plain, Taiwan [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1363?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We have collected a large number of accelerograms recorded by the Taiwan Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (TSMIP) stations to study the thickness variations of Quaternary alluviums beneath Lan-Yang Plain, Taiwan, using an <I>Sp</I> converted wave. The estimated thicknesses of the Quaternary sediments inferred by the travel-time difference of <I>S</I> and <I>Sp</I> waves are between 200 and 1400&nbsp;m and become thicker toward the northeast. In general, our resulting features of the time difference of arrivals between <I>Sp</I> and <I>S</I> waves are consistent with the previous studies on thickness variations of the Quaternary alluviums beneath Lan-Yang Plain assuming the converting point is at the unconsolidated Quaternary alluvial sediments&ndash;Miocene basement interface. Our study suggests that this technique of using <I>P</I>-<I>S</I> converted phases could be applied to the other populated basins or plains in the Taiwan region based on its dense coverage of the TSMIP stations and high seismic activity. This technique is simple and time effective and can be used to determine the general characteristics of velocity/thickness structure of a study area.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chang, C. H., Lin, T. L., Wu, Y. M., Chang, W. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090305</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Basement Imaging Using Sp Converted Phases from a Dense Strong-Motion Array in Lan-Yang Plain, Taiwan [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1369</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1363</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1370?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evidence for Strong Ground Motion by Waves Refracted from the Conrad Discontinuity [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1370?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Conrad discontinuity, a boundary between the upper and the lower crusts, has long been identified in many continental crusts. The influence of the Conrad discontinuity on seismic hazards, however, has been rarely known. Strong regional phases corresponding to the waves refracted from the Conrad discontinuity are observed in the Korean Peninsula. These phases show strong amplitudes of 2&ndash;4&nbsp;times larger than those of the direct waves. The observation is confirmed by numerical modeling of waveforms. These observations not only support the existence of the Conrad discontinuity in the Korean Peninsula but also suggest the potential of seismic hazards by the Conrad phases. Such strong Conrad-refracted phases are typically recorded in the <I>Pn</I> coda portion, which may cause overestimation of <I>Pn</I> body-wave magnitudes for regional events.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[He, X., Hong, T. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090159</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evidence for Strong Ground Motion by Waves Refracted from the Conrad Discontinuity [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1374</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1370</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1375?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Seismic Input Motion Determined from a Surface-Downhole Pair of Sensors: A Constrained Deconvolution Approach [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1375?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We apply a deconvolution approach to the problem of determining the input motion at the base of an instrumented borehole using only a pair of recordings, one at the borehole surface and the other at its bottom. To stabilize the bottom-to-surface spectral ratio, we apply an iterative regularization algorithm that allows us to constrain the solution to be positively defined and to have a finite time duration. Through the analysis of synthetic data, we show that the method is capable of retrieving reliable input motion, suppressing the effect of the negative interference generated by the downgoing waves. Results obtained by applying the methodology to weak earthquakes recorded at the Atak&ouml;y (Istanbul) vertical array are also presented and show that removing the effect of the downgoing waves is remarkable, even considering the recording at a depth of 140&nbsp;m.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bindi, D., Parolai, S., Picozzi, M., Ansal, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090306</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Seismic Input Motion Determined from a Surface-Downhole Pair of Sensors: A Constrained Deconvolution Approach [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1380</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1375</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1381?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Method for Estimating the Green's Function of a Near-Surface Layer for SH-Waves by Means of a Borehole Receiver Array [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1381?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>I herein propose a new method for estimating the true Green&rsquo;s function of a near-surface layered structure for <I>SH</I> waves at the borehole receiver depth from the apparent Green&rsquo;s function that contains downgoing waves from the upper layers and the free surface. These Green&rsquo;s functions are defined using transfer functions in the <I>z</I>-transform domain. The information required for the proposed method is a set of pole frequencies that are the frequencies at which the transfer function (the input and output of which are borehole and surface recordings, respectively) has poles. The real part of the true Green&rsquo;s function is related to the gain function of this transfer function for a perfectly elastic lossless medium, and the imaginary part is connected to the real part by means of a Kramers&ndash;Kronig relation. The results obtained by applying the proposed method to actual borehole receiver array recordings show that convolutions of the impulse response of the estimated reciprocal of the Green&rsquo;s function and surface recordings successfully output upcoming and downgoing waves at the borehole receiver depth. As a result, the synthesized borehole wave is in good agreement with the recorded borehole wave.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kinoshita, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090115</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Method for Estimating the Green's Function of a Near-Surface Layer for SH-Waves by Means of a Borehole Receiver Array [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1388</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1381</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1389?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysis of Coseismic Water-Level Changes in the Wells in the Koyna-Warna Region, Western India [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1389?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We test the hypothesis that coseismic water-level changes in wells are proportional to coseismic volumetric strain by analyzing available data from the Koyna&ndash;Warna region of western India. A total of 18 cases of water-level changes have been reported at ten wells corresponding to six earthquakes of <I>M</I>&ge;4.3 that occurred in the region from 1997 to 2005. Out of these, clear unambiguous steplike coseismic water-level changes have been observed in ten cases at five confined wells. We used basic poroelastic theory to simulate volumetric strain and corresponding water-level changes and find that all cases show consistency in sign between reported coseismic water-level changes and simulated volumetric strain. All confined wells with high strain sensitivity that are located near earthquake epicenters show good agreement in magnitude between simulated and reported volumetric strain, thereby supporting this hypothesis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gahalaut, K., Gahalaut, V. K., Chadha, R. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090165</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysis of Coseismic Water-Level Changes in the Wells in the Koyna-Warna Region, Western India [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1394</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1389</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1395?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The 20 January 2007 ML 4.8 Odaesan Earthquake and Its Implications for Regional Tectonics in Korea [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/3/1395?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A moderate-sized earthquake (<I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB>&nbsp;4.8) occurred in the mideast Korea Peninsula on 20 January 2007. It was the largest inland earthquake to occur there since the inception of a modern seismic observation system. Although only four aftershocks were noticed in previous studies, a careful review of continuous data revealed that the main event was accompanied by at least 74&nbsp;micro foreshocks and aftershocks. A subset of 25 events was selected for further analysis to determine precise earthquake locations, focal mechanism solutions, and the current status of regional tectonic stress, as well as to answer questions raised about the sequence. Earthquake hypocenters were seen to be more clustered after the HypoDD relocation. A source radius of 1&nbsp;km for the main event was estimated based on the distribution of precisely determined aftershock locations. Focal mechanism solutions of larger events in the sequence suggest either a left-lateral strike-slip fault trending west-northwest&ndash;east-southeast or a right-lateral strike-slip fault trending north-northeast&ndash;south-southwest as the responsible structure. Although the Woljeongsa fault striking north-northeast&ndash;south-southwest in the local geological map matches one of the proposed trends, precise earthquake relocation results gave a contradictory result, showing that a previously unknown west-northwest&ndash;east-southeast striking fault was responsible for the earthquake sequence. We also observed an unusual lack of large-magnitude aftershocks, a relatively large stress drop during the main event, and no previous earthquake record in the region. Observations made in the study consistently indicate the sequence nucleated along a less-developed fault. Focal mechanism solutions suggest the current status of tectonic stress governing earthquake generation in Korea is east-northeast&ndash;west-southwest compression and north-northwest&ndash;south-southeast extension.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, K. H., Park, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:37:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090234</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The 20 January 2007 ML 4.8 Odaesan Earthquake and Its Implications for Regional Tectonics in Korea [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1405</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1395</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/423?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Earthquake Monitoring in Southern California for Seventy-Seven Years (1932-2008) [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/423?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN) has produced the SCSN earthquake catalog from 1932 to the present, a period of more than 77&nbsp;yrs. This catalog consists of phase picks, hypocenters, and magnitudes. We present the history of the SCSN and the evolution of the catalog, to facilitate user understanding of its limitations and strengths. Hypocenters and magnitudes have improved in quality with time, as the number of stations has increased gradually from 7 to ~400 and the data acquisition and measuring procedures have become more sophisticated. The magnitude of completeness (<I>M</I><SUB>c</SUB>) of the network has improved from <I>M</I><SUB>c</SUB>~3.25 in the early years to <I>M</I><SUB>c</SUB>~1.8 at present, or better in the most densely instrumented areas. Mainshock&ndash;aftershock and swarm sequences and scattered individual background earthquakes characterize the seismicity of more than 470,000 events. The earthquake frequency-size distribution has an average <I>b</I>-value of ~1.0, with <I>M</I>&ge;6.0 events occurring approximately every 3&nbsp;yrs. The three largest earthquakes recorded were 1952 <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;7.5 Kern County, 1992 <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;7.3 Landers, and 1999 <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;7.1 Hector Mine sequences, and the three most damaging earthquakes were the 1933 <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;6.4 Long Beach, 1971 <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;6.7 San Fernando, and 1994 <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;6.7 Northridge earthquakes. All of these events ruptured slow-slipping faults, located away from the main plate boundary fault, the San Andreas fault. Their aftershock sequences constitute about a third of the events in the catalog. The fast slipping southern San Andreas fault is relatively quiet at the microseismic level and has not had an <I>M</I>&gt;6 earthquake since 1932. In contrast, the slower San Jacinto fault has the highest level of seismicity, including several <I>M</I>&gt;6 events. Thus, the spatial and temporal seismicity patterns exhibit a complex relationship with the plate tectonic crustal deformation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hutton, K., Woessner, J., Hauksson, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090130</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Earthquake Monitoring in Southern California for Seventy-Seven Years (1932-2008) [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>446</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>423</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/447?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Non-Double-Couple Earthquake Mechanism as an Artifact of the Point-Source Approach Applied to a Finite-Extent Focus [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/447?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A sizable amount of moderate and strong earthquakes exhibit a considerable percentage of non-double-couple (non-DC) components in the mechanism, as reported by agencies determining moment tensors on a routine basis from long-period seismograms. As most of them are tectonic events where a simple shear slip is anticipated along a roughly planar fault (at least in the optics of the long periods used), suspicion arises about their source origin. Leaving aside anisotropy in the source region, we assign them to be side effects of the application of the first degree moment tensor approximation to data still containing (after low-pass filtering) information about the source finiteness. We verify the hypothesis in a synthetic experiment simulating a finite-extent source&mdash;a unilaterally propagating shear slip&mdash;and invert the synthetic data into moments up to degree 2. The first degree moment&mdash;traditional moment tensor&mdash;exhibits more that 20% of non-DC components. If we restitute the data by subtracting the contribution of the second degree moments, these spurious components are suppressed and the mechanism becomes almost pure double couple. The orientation of the mechanism is, however, not affected discernibly. Spurious non-DC components can be generated also by noise contamination of the observed seismic records and by using an improper Green&rsquo;s function when inverting the data, which happens in cases of mislocation of the hypocenter and/or mismodeling the velocity/attenuation in the area. In additional synthetic experiments, we demonstrate that reasonably estimated effects just listed do not mask the phenomenon of appearance of the non-DC originated by neglecting the source finiteness and correcting for the second degree moments reveals the proper mechanism.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adamova, P., Sileny, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:35 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090097</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Non-Double-Couple Earthquake Mechanism as an Artifact of the Point-Source Approach Applied to a Finite-Extent Focus [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>457</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>447</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/458?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evidence for Near-Horizontal Tensile Faulting at the Base of Gornergletscher, a Swiss Alpine Glacier [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/458?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Using 3D Green&rsquo;s functions we determine full and constrained moment tensor solutions of icequakes near the base of Gornergletscher, Switzerland. The seismic events were recorded in the summer of 2004 using a high-density seismometer array. The seismic velocity model used in the generation of Green&rsquo;s functions is based on radio-echo soundings to approximate the basal topography, which beneath the study site exhibits a strong inclination. As the basal conditions are not well known, we try moment tensor inversions with seismic velocity profiles consisting of two and three media. The former case consists of homogeneous ice resting on bedrock, whereas the latter case includes a thin basal layer with slow seismic velocities representing eroded material or highly fractured ice. Effects of errors in Green&rsquo;s functions are estimated by sensitivity studies in which we invert 1D and 3D synthetics using Green&rsquo;s functions of wrong velocity models. The results show that calculations of source types and fault plane orientations of tensile cracks are rather robust with respect to errors in Green&rsquo;s functions. However, the quality of the waveform fits depends on strike and dip of the synthetic source. When inverting seismograms, Green&rsquo;s functions of the seismic model that includes the basal slow velocity layer are found to give the most realistic source types as well as the best waveform fits. The fault mechanisms derived from constrained moment tensor inversions are near-horizontal tensile cracks, which suggest a complex time-dependent basal stress field.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter, F., Dreger, D. S., Clinton, J. F., Deichmann, N., Funk, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090083</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evidence for Near-Horizontal Tensile Faulting at the Base of Gornergletscher, a Swiss Alpine Glacier [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>472</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>458</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/473?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Slip-Length Scaling Law for Strike-Slip Multiple Segment Earthquakes Based on Dynamic Rupture Simulations [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/473?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Most large earthquakes occur on several faults, and accordingly it is important to the prediction of earthquake size to know whether several adjacent faults rupture simultaneously and how slips are distributed on the simultaneously ruptured faults. In this article, I investigate slip-length scaling law, simulating spontaneous rupture processes on multisegmented strike-slip faults in a 3D half-space. Because of fault interaction, the amount of slip caused by simultaneous ruptures on two or more segments is larger than that of a rupture on a single segment. The fault interaction decreases with the distance between segments, thus the amount of slip attains a constant value when more than two segments rupture. The decrease of fault interaction also causes the small rate of slip increase for simultaneous ruptures on long segments. The numerical results physically support the empirical scaling law, which is characterized by a strong increase of slip with length and a tendency for slip to saturate for very long faults.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kase, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090090</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Slip-Length Scaling Law for Strike-Slip Multiple Segment Earthquakes Based on Dynamic Rupture Simulations [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>481</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>473</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/482?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physics-Based Earthquake Source Characterization and Modeling with Geostatistics [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/482?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Physics-based ground-motion simulation requires the development of physically self-consistent source modeling tools to emulate the essential physics of earthquake rupture. Because of the high computational demand of full-dynamic rupture modeling, the kinematic description of earthquake source processes provides the most practical way of covering a wide range of rupture and wave propagation scenarios. We apply 2D spatial data analysis tools, commonly used in geostatistics, to characterizing earthquake rupture process and developing an effective source modeling tool for strong-motion prediction. The earthquake source process is described by key kinematic source parameters, such as static slip, rupture velocity, and slip duration. The heterogeneity of each source parameter is characterized with autocoherence while the linear dependency (coupling) between parameters is characterized with cross coherence. Both zero- and nonzero-offset spatial coherence can be considered in the form of cross coherence. We analyzed both synthetic and real dynamic rupture models to demonstrate the efficiency of these new techniques and found that many important features of earthquake rupture can be captured in this way, which may be difficult to analyze, or even detect by zero-offset coherence only. For instance, the correlation maximum between slip and rupture velocity can be shifted from the zero offset, that is, large slip may generate faster rupture velocity ahead of the current rupture front, which may be important for rupture directivity. We demonstrate that we can generate a number of realizations of earthquake source models to reproduce the target coherence using stochastic modeling techniques (e.g., sequential Gaussian simulation) once coherence structures in earthquake rupture are well understood. This type of coherence analysis may provide the potential for improved understanding of earthquake source characteristics and how they control the characteristics of near-fault strong ground motions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Song, S. G., Somerville, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090134</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physics-Based Earthquake Source Characterization and Modeling with Geostatistics [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>496</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>482</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/497?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On Possible Plume-Guided Seismic Waves [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/497?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Hypothetical thermal plumes in the Earth&rsquo;s mantle are expected to have low seismic-wave speeds and thus would support the propagation of guided elastic waves analogous to fault-zone guided seismic waves, fiber-optic waves, and acoustic waves in the oceanic SOund Fixing And Ranging channel. Plume-guided waves would be insensitive to geometric complexities in the wave guide, and their dispersion would make them distinctive on seismograms and would provide information about wave-guide structure that would complement seismic tomography. Detecting such waves would constitute strong evidence of a new kind for the existence of plumes.</p>
<p>A cylindrical channel embedded in an infinite medium supports two classes of axially symmetric elastic-wave modes, torsional and longitudinal-radial. Torsional modes have rectilinear particle motion tangent to the cylinder surface. Longitudinal-radial modes have elliptical particle motion in planes that include the cylinder axis, with retrograde motion near the axis. The direction of elliptical particle motion reverses with distance from the axis: once for the fundamental mode, twice for the first overtone, and so on. Each mode exists only above its cut-off frequency, where the phase and group speeds equal the shear-wave speed in the infinite medium. At high frequencies, both speeds approach the shear-wave speed in the channel. All modes have minima in their group speeds, which produce Airy phases on seismograms. For shear wave&ndash;speed contrasts of a few percent, thought to be realistic for thermal plumes in the Earth, the largest signals are inversely dispersed and have dominant frequencies of about 0.1&ndash;1&nbsp;Hz and durations of 15&ndash;30&nbsp;sec.</p>
<p>There are at least two possible sources of observable plume waves: (1)&nbsp;the intersection of mantle plumes with high-amplitude core-phase caustics in the deep mantle; and (2)&nbsp;<I>ScS</I>-like reflection at the core-mantle boundary of downward-propagating guided waves. The widespread recent deployment of broadband seismometers makes searching for these waves possible.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julian, B. R., Evans, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On Possible Plume-Guided Seismic Waves [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>508</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>497</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/509?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Precursory Rise of P-Wave Attenuation before the 2004 Parkfield Earthquake [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/509?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>On 28 September 2004 an <I>M</I>&nbsp;6.0 earthquake occurred, rupturing a 30-km stretch of the San Andreas fault near Parkfield, California. The fault segment, which hosted a cluster of nearly identical microearthquakes (a multiplet), had been under close surveillance since the mid-1980s following a long-term prediction by the United States Geological Survey that a characteristic earthquake of <I>M</I>~6.0 would occur near Parkfield before 1993. The multiplet made possible a study of temporal changes in seismic propagation characteristics associated with the mainshock. We show that a sharp rise in <I>P</I>-wave attenuation operator <I>t</I><sup>*</sup> began to appear about 18&nbsp;months before the belated seismic event, accompanied by a rapid fall in <I>P</I>/<I>S</I> ratio, in both the frequency and time domains. The <I>P</I> waves that interrogated the northern half of the impending rupture zone, where the coseismic slip was to be the largest, yielded the strongest <I>t</I><sup>*</sup> anomalies. The anomalies peaked six weeks after the Parkfield earthquake and then diminished rapidly in the months ensuing. The preseismic rise of the <I>t</I><sup>*</sup>, accompanied by a rapidly falling <I>P</I>/<I>S</I> ratio, pointed to a decline in pore-fluid saturation due to microcracking that culminated in the catastrophic rock failure during the fault rupture.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chun, K.-Y., Yuan, Q.-Y., Henderson, G. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090104</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Precursory Rise of P-Wave Attenuation before the 2004 Parkfield Earthquake [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>521</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>509</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/522?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Triggering Effect of M 4-5 Earthquakes on the Earthquake Cycle of Repeating Events at Parkfield, California [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/522?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Stress perturbations influence earthquake recurrence and are of fundamental importance to understanding the earthquake cycle and determining earthquake hazard. The large population of repeating earthquakes on the San Andreas fault at Parkfield, California, provides a unique opportunity to examine the response of the repeating events to the occurrence of moderate earthquakes. Using 187 <I>M</I>&nbsp;-0.4 to ~1.7 repeating earthquake sequences from the High Resolution Seismic Network catalog, we find that the time to recurrence of repeating events subsequent to nearby <I>M</I>&nbsp;4&ndash;5 earthquakes is shortened, suggesting triggering by major events. The triggering effect is found to be most evident within a distance of ~5 km, corresponding to static coseismic stress changes of &gt;0.6-26.6 kPa, and decays with distance. We also find coherently reduced recurrence intervals from 1993 to 1998. This enduring recurrence acceleration over several years reflects accelerated fault slip and thus loading rates during the early 1990s.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, K. H., Burgmann, R., Nadeau, R. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080369</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Triggering Effect of M 4-5 Earthquakes on the Earthquake Cycle of Repeating Events at Parkfield, California [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>531</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>522</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/532?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Localized Surface Disruptions Observed by InSAR during Strong Earthquakes in Java and Hawai'i [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/532?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar data spanning strong earthquakes on the islands of Java and Hawai&lsquo;i in 2006 reveal patches of subsidence and incoherence indicative of localized ground failure. Interferograms spanning the 26 May 2006 Java earthquake suggest an area of about 7.5 km<sup>2</sup> of subsidence (~2 cm) and incoherence south of the city of Yogyakarta that correlates with significant damage to housing, high modeled peak ground accelerations, and poorly consolidated geologic deposits. The subsidence and incoherence is inferred to be a result of intense shaking and/or damage. At least five subsidence patches on the west side of the Island of Hawai&lsquo;i, ranging 0.3&ndash;2.2 km<sup>2</sup> in area and 3&ndash;8 cm in magnitude, occurred as a result of a pair of strong earthquakes on 15 October 2006. Although no felt reports or seismic data are available from the areas in Hawai&lsquo;i, the Java example suggests that the subsidence patches indicate areas of amplified earthquake shaking. Surprisingly, all subsidence areas in Hawai&lsquo;i were limited to recent, and supposedly stable, lava flows and may reflect geological conditions not detectable at the surface. In addition, two &lsquo;a&lsquo;a lava flows in Hawai&lsquo;i were partially incoherent in interferograms spanning the earthquakes, indicating surface disruption as a result of the earthquake shaking. Coearthquake incoherence of rubbly deposits, like &lsquo;a&lsquo;a flows, should be explored as a potential indicator of earthquake intensity and past strong seismic activity.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poland, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090175</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Localized Surface Disruptions Observed by InSAR during Strong Earthquakes in Java and Hawai'i [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>540</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>532</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/541?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Five Short Historical Earthquake Surface Ruptures near the Silk Road, Gansu Province, China [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/541?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Five historical earthquakes (<I>M</I>&ge;7) have occurred along the Hexi Corridor at the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau since A.D. 180. These are the A.D. 180 Gaotai earthquake (<I>M</I>&nbsp;7.5), the 1609 Hongyazi earthquake (<I>M</I>&nbsp;7.25), the 1927 Gulang earthquake (<I>M</I>&nbsp;8.0), the 1932 Changma earthquake (<I>M</I>&nbsp;7.6), and the 1954 Shandan earthquake (<I>M</I>&nbsp;7.3). They are predominantly reverse slip, except for the 1932 Changma and the 1954 Shandan earthquakes. The Changma earthquake is characterized by left-lateral faulting with a reverse component, while the Shandan earthquake by right-lateral faulting with a normal component.</p>
<p>Field investigations indicate that the length of the surface-rupture zone is only 28&nbsp;km for the A.D. 180 earthquake, 11&nbsp;km for the 1609 earthquake, 23&nbsp;km for the 1927 earthquake, and 5.1&nbsp;km for the 1954 earthquake, much shorter than that predicted using an empirical equation between moment magnitude (<I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>), surface-rupture length (<I>SRL</I>), coseismic displacement (<I>D</I>), maximum displacement (<I>MD</I>), average displacement (<I>AD</I>), and mode value combined displacement statistic (<I>MVCDS</I>): <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>=5.91+0.609log(<I>SRL</I><FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT><I>D</I>) for strike-slip faults, <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>=5.81+0.653log(<I>SRL</I><FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT><I>D</I>) for reverse faults, and <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>=6.93+0.82log(<I>AD</I><FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT><I>MVCDS</I>) for all faults. This may be common for reverse faulting earthquakes worldwide and suggests that trying to estimate magnitudes of past earthquakes from one type of even the most recent surface-rupture data is unreliable and the empirical equations between magnitude, coseismic slip, and surface-rupture length should be applied with caution to seismic hazard assessment on active thrust faults.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, X., Yeats, R. S., Yu, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080282</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Five Short Historical Earthquake Surface Ruptures near the Silk Road, Gansu Province, China [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>561</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>541</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/562?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Catalog of Felt Intensity Data for 570 Earthquakes in India from 1636 to 2009 [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/562?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Eight thousand three hundred thirty-nine intensity observations have been evaluated for earthquakes that occurred on the Indian subcontinent and surrounding plate boundaries from the seventeenth century to the present. They characterize 570 earthquakes, more than 90% of which occurred in the past two centuries. The electronic supplement to this article lists these data using European Macroseismic Scale (EMS-98) intensities with their geographic coordinates. We summarize these data graphically in the form of a spatially averaged intensity map for the subcontinent, a map that emphasizes the features of many previously published earthquake hazard maps for the Indian plate, but which more faithfully depicts regional amplification and attenuation. We also estimate the probable return time for future damaging shaking in five of India&rsquo;s largest cities.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin, S., Szeliga, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080328</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Catalog of Felt Intensity Data for 570 Earthquakes in India from 1636 to 2009 [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>569</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>562</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/570?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intensity, Magnitude, Location, and Attenuation in India for Felt Earthquakes since 1762 [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/570?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A comprehensive, consistently interpreted new catalog of felt intensities for India (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf37">Martin and Szeliga, 2010</cross-ref>, this issue) includes intensities for 570 earthquakes; instrumental magnitudes and locations are available for 100 of these events. We use the intensity values for 29 of the instrumentally recorded events to develop new intensity versus attenuation relations for the Indian subcontinent and the Himalayan region. We then use these relations to determine the locations and magnitudes of 234 historical events, using the method of <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf7">Bakun and Wentworth (1997)</cross-ref>. For the remaining 336 events, intensity distributions are too sparse to determine magnitude or location. We evaluate magnitude and location accuracy of newly located events by comparing the instrumental- with the intensity-derived location for 29 calibration events, for which more than 15 intensity observations are available. With few exceptions, most intensity-derived locations lie within a fault length of the instrumentally determined location. For events in which the azimuthal distribution of intensities is limited, we conclude that the formal error bounds from the regression of <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf7">Bakun and Wentworth (1997)</cross-ref> do not reflect the true uncertainties. We also find that the regression underestimates the uncertainties of the location and magnitude of the 1819 Allah Bund earthquake, for which a location has been inferred from mapped surface deformation. Comparing our inferred attenuation relations to those developed for other regions, we find that attenuation for Himalayan events is comparable to intensity attenuation in California (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf7">Bakun and Wentworth, 1997</cross-ref>), while intensity attenuation for cratonic events is higher than intensity attenuation reported for central/eastern North America (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf8">Bakun <I>et&nbsp;al.</I>, 2003</cross-ref>). Further, we present evidence that intensities of intraplate earthquakes have a nonlinear dependence on magnitude such that attenuation relations based largely on small-to-moderate earthquakes may significantly overestimate the magnitudes of historical earthquakes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Szeliga, W., Hough, S., Martin, S., Bilham, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080329</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intensity, Magnitude, Location, and Attenuation in India for Felt Earthquakes since 1762 [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>584</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>570</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/585?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Application of Rotational Sensors to Correcting Rotation-Induced Effects on Accelerometers [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/585?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Dynamic and permanent seismic displacements are important for seismologists and engineers and, in principle, can be derived from the double-time integral of translational acceleration. However, because translational accelerometers are sensitive not only to translational but also to rotational motions, it is not possible to recover with assurance the true displacement by direct double-time integration of acceleration without first applying corrections from separately recorded rotational motions. This paper applies an attitude equation from the navigational literature to obtain the time-dependent orientation of the accelerometer from colocated recordings of three-axis rotation rate and then applies an attitude-correction equation together with orientation and these rotational data to correct centrifugal and tilt-induced gravitational effects on accelerometers. Finally, we perform coordinate transformations to derive the dynamic motion in an inertially fixed (geographic) coordinates frame rather than in the body-attached coordinates in which they are recorded. To verify our algorithm, we attached a three-axis translational accelerometer and a three-axis rotation-rate sensor together to the end of a robot arm. By moving the robot arm simultaneously in translation and rotation, we find a good match between displacements calculated with our correction scheme and the actual robot-arm movements, as determined by the robot&rsquo;s inputs and feedback system.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, C.-J., Huang, H.-P., Liu, C.-C., Chiu, H.-C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090123</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Application of Rotational Sensors to Correcting Rotation-Induced Effects on Accelerometers [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>597</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>585</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/598?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Optical Seismometer without Force Feedback [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/598?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We are developing a new vertical seismometer, motivated by a desire to have an instrument whose performance is similar to that of observatory sensors yet can operate within a borehole without electronics. This has led us to an all-optical seismometer consisting of a spring-suspended mass whose position is monitored interferometrically. We use a Michelson interferometer illuminated with a 1&nbsp;mW laser that can be linked to the seismometer with optical fibers only. A digital signal processor samples the interference fringe signal and produces a 400 samples/sec record of the seismometer mass displacement with a root mean square noise per octave band that varies from about 4<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>-12</sup> m at 0.001&nbsp;Hz to 4<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>-13</sup> m at 1&nbsp;Hz. The maximum displacement is limited by mechanical issues to a few millimeters at present, providing a dynamic range of at least 10<sup>9</sup>, equivalent to 30&nbsp;bits (180&nbsp;dB). Experiments to test this idea have been performed on a modified STS1 vertical seismometer whose electronics have been replaced with an optical system. Comparisons with other seismometers show that, in terms of both noise and signal fidelity, the optical approach is quite viable.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zumberge, M., Berger, J., Otero, J., Wielandt, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090136</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Optical Seismometer without Force Feedback [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>605</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>598</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/606?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On the Composition of Earth's Short-Period Seismic Noise Field [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/606?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In the classic microseismic band of 5&ndash;20&nbsp;sec, seismic noise consists mainly of fundamental mode Rayleigh and Love waves; however, at shorter periods seismic noise also contains a significant amount of body-wave energy and higher mode surface waves. In this study we perform a global survey of Earth&rsquo;s short-period seismic noise field with the goal of quantifying the relative contributions of these propagation modes. We examined a year&rsquo;s worth of vertical component data from 18 seismic arrays of the International Monitoring System that were sited in a variety of geologic environments. The apertures of the arrays varied from 2 to 28&nbsp;km, constraining the periods we analyzed to 0.25&ndash;2.5&nbsp;sec. Using frequency-wavenumber analysis we identified the apparent velocity for each sample of noise and classified its mode of propagation. The dominant component was found to be <I>L</I><SUB><I>g</I></SUB>, occurring in about 50% of the noise windows. Because <I>L</I><SUB><I>g</I></SUB> does not propagate across ocean&ndash;continent boundaries, this energy is most likely created in shallow water areas near coastlines. The next most common component was <I>P</I>-wave energy, which accounted for about 28% of the noise windows. These were split between regional <I>P</I> waves (<I>P</I><SUB><I>n</I></SUB>/<I>P</I><SUB><I>g</I></SUB> at 6%), mantle bottoming <I>P</I> waves (14%), and core-sensitive waves (<I>PKP</I> at 8%). This energy is mostly generated in deep water away from coastlines, with a region of the North Pacific centered at 165&deg;&nbsp;W and 40&deg;&nbsp;N being especially prolific. The remainder of the energy arriving in the noise consisted of <I>R</I><SUB><I>g</I></SUB> waves (28%), a large fraction of which may have a cultural origin. Hence, in contrast to the classic microseismic band of 5&ndash;20&nbsp;sec, at shorter periods fundamental mode Rayleigh waves are the least significant component.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koper, K. D., Seats, K., Benz, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090120</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On the Composition of Earth's Short-Period Seismic Noise Field [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>617</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>606</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/618?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Background Noise Characteristics at the IberArray Broadband Seismic Network [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/618?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The characteristics of the background seismic noise recorded at the IberArray broadband seismic network have been analyzed using power spectral density estimates and their corresponding probability density functions (PDFs). The network is composed of 55 stations that have been deployed in southern Iberia and northern Morocco beginning in the summer of 2007. PDFs provide a useful tool for monitoring the network performance, allowing identification of stations with anomalously high noise levels. They can also be used to investigate the major sources of noise at different frequency bands and the seismic background noise variations related to time of day, season, weather, location, and type of installation. At high frequencies (&gt;1 Hz), the main contribution seems to arise from the cultural noise, and therefore significant variations are observed between noise levels at different stations based on proximity to populated areas. At microseismic frequencies (0.05&ndash;1&nbsp;Hz), the noise level is more uniform among stations, although sites along the Gulf of C&aacute;diz show a slightly increased level. At long periods, the vertical component noise level usually lies 15&nbsp;dB above the new low-noise model and the horizontal components are much noisier, sometimes exceeding the new high-noise model for periods longer than 20&nbsp;sec. Infragravity waves can be identified along the network for periods close to 100&nbsp;sec, even for stations located inland. The distribution of the median noise levels across the IberArray network shows a clear correlation with major geological features, such as the Guadalquivir and Gharb sedimentary basins, where noise is high, and the Iberian Massif where the noise levels are lowest. Among the main temporal variations observed we can highlight the diurnal differences in the noise level, particularly significant for high frequencies, and the noise level variations correlated to the significant wave heights in the surrounding water bodies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diaz, J., Villasenor, A., Morales, J., Pazos, A., Cordoba, D., Pulgar, J., Garcia-Lobon, J. L., Harnafi, M., Carbonell, R., Gallart, J., TopoIberia Seismic Working Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090085</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Background Noise Characteristics at the IberArray Broadband Seismic Network [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>628</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>618</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/629?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Detection of Systematic Errors in Travel-Time Data Using a Minimum 1D Model: Application to Costa Rica Seismic Tomography [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/629?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Many seismological studies depend on the accuracy of timing of seismological data. In seismic tomography, travel-time residuals defined as differences between the observed and calculated arrival times of seismic phases are minimized to constrain 3D velocity structure. Inconsistencies and large errors in data sets that result from incorrect station coordinates, errors in the timing acquisition system, errors in the merging procedure, inconsistency in the picking and phase misidentification can also generate travel-time residuals, and because of their systematic nature, these errors cannot be treated as random noise even by exploiting a large number of travel times. While the inverse problem is perfectly set up to deal with random noise, systematic errors lead to significant artifacts in the solution, but may not be detected by a posterior error assessment. For this reason, detecting and removing systematic travel-time errors from data sets before inversion is crucial for seismic tomography studies.</p>
<p>We present a methodology based on the use of a minimum 1D model to detect and remove systematic errors in travel-time data by detailed analysis of station delays and observation residuals and apply it to a local earthquake data set from Costa Rica. The determination of the exact nature of detected inconsistencies needs further investigations in each individual case. If the cause of detected systematic errors cannot be determined beyond any doubt and the afflicted data may not be corrected, they must be deleted from the data set. To assess the extent of influence of systematic errors on hypocenter locations and their uncertainties, we present two examples showing the effects of station mislocation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurer, V., Kissling, E., Husen, S., Quintero, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Detection of Systematic Errors in Travel-Time Data Using a Minimum 1D Model: Application to Costa Rica Seismic Tomography [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>639</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>629</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/640?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Crust and Upper-Mantle Model of Eurasia and North Africa for Pn Travel-Time Calculation [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/640?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We develop a regional seismic travel-time (RSTT) model and method for use in routine seismic analysis. The model parameterization is a global tessellation of nodes with a velocity profile at each node. Interpolation of the velocity profiles generates a 3D crust and laterally variable upper-mantle velocity. The upper-mantle velocity profile at each node is represented as a linear velocity gradient, which enables travel-time computation in approximately 1&nbsp;millisecond. This computational speed allows the model to be used in routine analyses in operational monitoring systems. We refine the model using a tomographic formulation that adjusts the average crustal velocity, mantle velocity at the Moho, and the mantle velocity gradient at each node. While the RSTT model is inherently global, our first RSTT tomographic effort covers Eurasia and North Africa, where we have compiled a data set of approximately 600,000 <I>Pn</I> arrivals. Ten percent of the data set is randomly selected and set aside for testing purposes. Travel-time residual variance for the validation data is reduced by 32%. Based on a geographically distributed set of validation events with epicenter accuracy of 5&nbsp;km or better, epicenter error using 16 <I>Pn</I> arrivals is reduced by 46% from 17.3&nbsp;km (ak135 model) to 9.3&nbsp;km (RSTT model) after tomography. The median uncertainty ellipse area is reduced by 68% from 3070 km<sup>2</sup> (ak135) to 994 km<sup>2</sup> (RSTT), and the number of ellipses with area less than 1000 km<sup>2</sup>, which is the area allowed for onsite inspection under the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, is increased from 0% (ak135) to 51% (RSTT).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Myers, S. C., Begnaud, M. L., Ballard, S., Pasyanos, M. E., Phillips, W. S., Ramirez, A. L., Antolik, M. S., Hutchenson, K. D., Dwyer, J. J., Rowe, C. A., Wagner, G. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090198</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Crust and Upper-Mantle Model of Eurasia and North Africa for Pn Travel-Time Calculation [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>656</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>640</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/657?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[P-Wave Back-Azimuth and Slowness Anomalies Observed by an IMS Seismic Array LZDM [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/657?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The seismic array LZDM in China is a primary station of the International Monitoring System (IMS) for verifying compliance with the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. <I>P</I>-wave back-azimuth and slowness anomalies were found at LZDM during research on teleseismic events; that is, the back-azimuth and slowness errors of the <I>P</I> phases were found to be systematic and varied with theoretical back azimuth in a sinusoidal-like and cosinusoidal-like manner, respectively. The maximum values of back-azimuth and slowness errors reached 87.1&deg; and 8.68 sec/&deg;, respectively. Analysis showed that these errors could not be expressed as measurement errors because they were mostly caused by the dipping (Moho) below LZDM. These large systematic errors were well compensated by introducing several dipping Moho models. A velocity contrast of 0.84 km/sec across the Moho was chosen for these models. The best-fit dipping Moho model for all the data was found to have a 115&deg; strike and a 9&deg; dip angle. Moreover, the events in different slowness domains were adapted to specific submodels, which resulted in smaller average errors. The strikes of all the models were all around the point where the slowness errors change polarity from either positive to negative or from negative to positive. The corrected results for 151 teleseismic events were clearly improved by the introduction of the single dipping Moho model. Error analysis after structural correction showed that the average errors of back-azimuth and slowness residuals drop from 31.5&deg; to 11.6&deg; and from 3.2 sec/&deg; to 1.2 sec/&deg;, respectively; that is, the error reductions of back-azimuth and slowness residuals are 63.3% and 62.5%, respectively. To validate the model, we used another group of 166 events and did the structural corrections. Error analysis after structural correction showed that the average errors of back-azimuth and slowness residuals drop from 30.0&deg; to 13.2&deg; and from 3.5 sec/&deg; to 1.3 sec/&deg;, respectively; that is, the error reductions of back-azimuth and slowness residuals are 55.9% and 63.3%, respectively. Several submodels for different slowness domains have been introduced for the first 151 events group and 21 events from southeast with low slowness values, the error reduction ratios were higher (about 10% in back azimuth and slowness, respectively) than the application of the single Moho model. Error analysis after structural correction showed that the average errors of back-azimuth and slowness residuals drop from 30.8&deg; to 8.9&deg; and from 2.8 sec/&deg; to 0.7 sec/&deg;, respectively. The structural correction results of the second group of 166 events by the using of submodels gave a 9% improvement in the back-azimuth and slowness determination than the single Moho model, which implied the complexity that exists below the array. Error analysis after structural correction showed that the average errors of back-azimuth and slowness residuals drop from 30.0&deg; to 10.6&deg; and from 3.5 sec/&deg; to 1.0 sec/&deg;, respectively.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hao, C., Zheng, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090059</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[P-Wave Back-Azimuth and Slowness Anomalies Observed by an IMS Seismic Array LZDM [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>669</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>657</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/670?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Polarization Analysis in the Discrete Wavelet Domain: An Application to Volcano Seismology [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/670?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We propose a method for analyzing the polarization of three-component digital recordings using the discrete wavelet transform (DWT). This method allows for the automatic detection and separation of seismic phases that have a coherent linear or elliptical polarization. It can be correctly used in the analysis of seismic signals relating to volcanic activity because they arise from a complex wave field that consists of near-field and far-field components that have frequency-dependent polarization. First, the analytic extension of the signal is decomposed using DWT, then each single component is used to determine a local complex polarization vector in the timescale domain. This analysis reveals the presence of seismic phases with coherent polarization over a range of DWT scales and finite temporal intervals. Using the orthogonality property of the DWT, it is possible to isolate a single coherent component, reconstructing it in the time domain and computing the full polarization tensor. This procedure can be fully automated, introducing a quantitative definition of wavelet polarization coherence on the DWT dyadic grid. A recursive algorithm (called POLWAV) starts from the wavelet coefficient with the highest modulus, and then selects all of the neighbors that show coherence with it above a given threshold. We show how the POLWAV algorithm can be used for separating wave-field components and for detecting coherent seismic phases on continuous recordings. Example applications to actual seismic recordings at Stromboli Volcano (Tyrrhenian Sea) are presented.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[D'Auria, L., Giudicepietro, F., Martini, M., Orazi, M., Peluso, R., Scarpato, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090166</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Polarization Analysis in the Discrete Wavelet Domain: An Application to Volcano Seismology [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>683</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>670</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/684?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tpd, a Damped Predominant Period Function with Improvements for Magnitude Estimation [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/684?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We use an aftershock dataset of over 1500 events (<I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB> 0.7&ndash;5.8) to study the relationship between magnitude and the predominant period calculated from the initial <I>P</I>-wave arrival. We calculate <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq1"></inline-fig></f> (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf12">Nakamura, 1988</cross-ref>; <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf1">Allen and Kanamori, 2003</cross-ref>) and find that there is a trend between <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq2"></inline-fig></f> and magnitude, as reported by previous authors. However, the trend is weaker than expected. We calculate an alternative predominant period function, <I></I><SUB><I>c</I></SUB> (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf8">Kanamori, 2005</cross-ref>), and find virtually no relationship to magnitude for these data. We therefore implement a modified, damped version of the <I>T</I><sup><I>p</I></sup> function, which we term <I>T</I><sup><I>pd</I></sup>. The <I>T</I><sup><I>pd</I></sup> function introduces an additional term, <I>D</I><SUB><I>s</I></SUB>, aimed at stabilizing the predominant period function in the transition between noise and signal. We show that <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq3"></inline-fig></f> has an improved relationship to magnitude, with the average coefficient of determination (<I>R</I><sup>2</sup>) increasing from 0.15 for <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq4"></inline-fig></f> to 0.5 for <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq5"></inline-fig></f>. This improvement is consistent for all stations. We then apply the <I>T</I><sup><I>pd</I></sup> function to the displacement waveforms, calling the associated function <I>T</I><sup><I>pd</I>_<I>D</I></sup>. The trend in the <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq6"></inline-fig></f> versus magnitude relationship is superior to that of <I></I><SUB><I>c</I></SUB>. Analyzing the <I>T</I><sup><I>pd</I></sup> function, we conclude that improvements result from damping large values in the noise region, or reducing spikes during the noise-to-signal transition, thus preventing incorrect maxima from being selected. We attempt to optimize the <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq7"></inline-fig></f> and <I></I><SUB><I>c</I></SUB> results, and find that although the results improve, they are still significantly worse than for <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq8"></inline-fig></f>. The <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq9"></inline-fig></f> performance is shown to be robust and less dependent on the choice of parameters than <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq10"></inline-fig></f>. We then apply <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq11"></inline-fig></f> and <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq12"></inline-fig></f> to estimating magnitudes. Average errors are 20% smaller for <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq13"></inline-fig></f> estimates compared with optimized <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq14"></inline-fig></f> results, with greater improvement for unoptimized parameters. We conclude that the performance of <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq15"></inline-fig></f> is superior to <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="684eq16"></inline-fig></f> and <I></I><SUB><I>c</I></SUB> and should be considered for real-time magnitude estimation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hildyard, M. W., Rietbrock, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080368</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tpd, a Damped Predominant Period Function with Improvements for Magnitude Estimation [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>698</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>684</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/699?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Influence of Maximum Magnitude on Seismic-Hazard Estimates in the Central and Eastern United States [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/699?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>I analyze the sensitivity of seismic-hazard estimates in the central and eastern United States (CEUS) to maximum magnitude (<I>m</I><SUB>max</SUB>) by exercising the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) probabilistic hazard model with several <I>m</I><SUB>max</SUB> alternatives. Seismicity-based sources control the hazard in most of the CEUS, but data seldom provide an objective basis for estimating <I>m</I><SUB>max</SUB>. The USGS uses preferred <I>m</I><SUB>max</SUB> values of moment magnitude 7.0 and 7.5 for the CEUS craton and extended margin, respectively, derived from data in stable continental regions worldwide. Other approaches, for example analysis of local seismicity or judgment about a source&rsquo;s seismogenic potential, often lead to much smaller <I>m</I><SUB>max</SUB>.</p>
<p>Alternative models span the <I>m</I><SUB>max</SUB> ranges from the 1980s Electric Power Research Institute/Seismicity Owners Group (EPRI/SOG) analysis. Results are presented as hazard ratios relative to the USGS national seismic hazard maps. One alternative model specifies <I>m</I><SUB>max</SUB> equal to moment magnitude 5.0 and 5.5 for the craton and margin, respectively, similar to EPRI/SOG for some sources. For 2% probability of exceedance in 50&nbsp;years (about 0.0004 annual probability), the strong <I>m</I><SUB>max</SUB> truncation produces hazard ratios equal to 0.35&ndash;0.60 for 0.2-sec spectral acceleration, and 0.15&ndash;0.35 for 1.0-sec spectral acceleration. Hazard-controlling earthquakes interact with <I>m</I><SUB>max</SUB> in complex ways. There is a relatively weak dependence on probability level: hazard ratios increase 0&ndash;15% for 0.002 annual exceedance probability and decrease 5&ndash;25% for 0.00001 annual exceedance probability. Although differences at some sites are tempered when faults are added, <I>m</I><SUB>max</SUB> clearly accounts for some of the discrepancies that are seen in comparisons between USGS-based and EPRI/SOG-based hazard results.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mueller, C. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090114</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Influence of Maximum Magnitude on Seismic-Hazard Estimates in the Central and Eastern United States [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>711</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>699</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/712?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Geometric Spreading Functions and Modeling of Volcanic Zones for Strong-Motion Attenuation Models Derived from Records in Japan [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/712?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Attenuation models derived from recorded ground motions are still important elements of probabilistic seismic hazard studies. Engineers use empirical attenuation models to derive the displacement demand for a site of interest from an earthquake at a given location. Many attenuation models have been published for different parts of the world and for different types of earthquakes. Most models have a simple function of constant or magnitude-dependent geometric spreading, and seldom consider well-known seismological effects such as Moho reflection for shallow crustal earthquakes, multiple travel paths and constructive interference for subduction earthquakes, and special characteristics of volcano zones. The reason for not accounting for such effects may be the desire for simplicity in the attenuation functional forms for engineering applications and a lack of records from which to reliably identify these effects quantitatively. In this article, a large set of strong-motion records obtained from dense recording networks in Japan is used to derive geometric attenuation functional form and a possible manner to model the effect of volcanic zones. A liberal approach is taken to introduce a relatively large number of parameters that can account for known seismological effects while retaining a fairly simple attenuation functional form, based on analyses of residuals from simple models similar to those published previously. Preliminary results are reported here, together with the proposed geometric attenuation function forms and plausible explanation of the physical process that leads to the proposed geometric attenuation functions. The proposed model shows a large increase in the maximum likelihood from the random effects methodology, the elimination of bias in the distribution of residuals with respect to source distance, and much improved fitting for well-recorded earthquakes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhao, J. X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090070</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Geometric Spreading Functions and Modeling of Volcanic Zones for Strong-Motion Attenuation Models Derived from Records in Japan [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>732</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>712</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/733?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2D Analysis of Earthquake Ground Motion in Haifa Bay, Israel [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/733?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We study the earthquake response of the Zevulun Valley basin, underlying northern Israel&rsquo;s largest urban area, with 2D viscoelastic seismic modeling of a detailed geological section. We found that amplification of the horizontal vibrations, the ratio of basin to no-basin response spectra, correlates with basin depth. In the deepest portion of the basin (Qishon graben), long periods (2&ndash;5&nbsp;sec) are amplified by 400%; in the shallowest portion of the basin (Afeq horst), shorter periods (~0.5 sec) are amplified by 300%&ndash;400%. These resonances in the vertical direction through the basin are strong enough that their amplitude overwhelms the amplitude of a previously recognized basin-edge effect. The horizontal/vertical (H/V) Fourier spectral ratios based on 124 ambient noise measurements do not fully coincide with the basin to no-basin Fourier spectral ratios of the simulation, but the resonance frequencies found in both methods are alike. Moreover, the relation between the resonance frequency and the depth of the corresponding seismic reflector in the simulation is almost identical to the empirical frequency-depth relations obtained from measurements. This indicates that the average shear-wave velocity of the sedimentary column in the model is consistent with measurements. To evaluate the necessity of 2D analysis, we performed additional 1D simulations at two locations along the section. For the Qishon graben, 1D analysis underestimates the amplification factor relative to 2D by 25%, whereas for the Afeq horst, 1D and 2D simulations are similar. For a hard layer within the soft Qishon graben fill, we found that when the hard layer is thinner than ~50 m, its influence on ground motion is small.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gvirtzman, Z., Louie, J. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090019</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2D Analysis of Earthquake Ground Motion in Haifa Bay, Israel [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>750</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>733</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/751?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Hawaii from a Referenced Empirical Approach [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/751?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) for Hawaii are developed using the referenced empirical approach. The technique is based on the use of residual analysis that models discrepancies between ground-motion observations for Hawaii and a reference GMPE, in this case the GMPE of <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf10">Boore and Atkinson (2008)</cross-ref> for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions. The referenced empirical approach provides GMPEs for Hawaii that are in agreement with regional ground-motion observations, while being constrained to follow the overall scaling behavior of ground motion that is observed in better-instrumented regions. GMPEs are developed for both shallow (depth&lt;20 km) and deep (35 to 40&nbsp;km) earthquakes in Hawaii.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atkinson, G. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090098</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Hawaii from a Referenced Empirical Approach [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>761</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>751</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/762?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nonlinear Soil Behavior Observed at Vertical Array in the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant during the 2007 Niigata-ken Chuetsu-oki Earthquake [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/762?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant suffered extreme shaking during the 2007 Niigata-ken Chuetsu-oki earthquake. Accelerograms observed at the dense seismometer array in the plant are now open to the public and will provide valuable knowledge. The temporal changes of <I>S</I>-wave velocity were examined by using normalized input&ndash;output minimization (NIOM) method based on the vertical array records observed during the mainshock and the events before and after it. It was found that the <I>S</I>-wave velocity in the layers (surface&ndash;50&nbsp;m depth and 50&ndash;100&nbsp;m depth) decreased significantly during the principal motion of the mainshock (indicating nonlinear behavior), whereas nearly linear behavior was observed in the bedrock layer (below 100&nbsp;m depth). It was also found that the <I>S</I>-wave velocity increased in the layers above 100&nbsp;m depth soon after this motion, indicating no major liquefaction in these layers. Finally, the relationship between the shear modulus and shear strain was examined based on the obtained <I>S</I>-wave velocities. The normalized shear moduli (<I>G</I>/<I>G</I><SUB>0</SUB>) in the surface and intermediate layers decreased to about 0.2 at a strain level of 1<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>-3</sup> to 1<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>-2</sup> and about 0.6 at a strain level of 1<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>-3</sup> to 2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>-3</sup>.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mogi, H., Shrestha, S. M., Kawakami, H., Okamura, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090091</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nonlinear Soil Behavior Observed at Vertical Array in the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant during the 2007 Niigata-ken Chuetsu-oki Earthquake [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>775</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>762</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/776?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Statistical Validity Control on SPAC Microtremor Observations Recorded with a Restricted Number of Sensors [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/776?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The interpretation of an observed spatially averaged coherency (SPAC) spectrum assumes spatial and temporal stationarity of the microtremor wave field. This hypothesis gains in importance when recording coherency spectra (COHs) with a limited number of sensors. SPAC observations were recorded at three separate sites in Launceston (Australia) using a pair of sensors, triangular arrays, and hexagonal arrays to study the effect of the number of sensors, length of time series, and frequency interval for evaluating the shear-wave velocity (SWV) profile.</p>
<p>The imaginary component of the observed complex COH is separated into roughened and smoothed parts. The root mean square of the roughened imaginary COH (rms(Im)) is an expression of the statistical noise in the observed coherency, while the behavior of the smoothed imaginary COH gives some indication of the distribution of the microtremor wave field. The mean square of residuals (MSR) between observed and theoretical COHs is an indication of the confidence level on the SWV profile interpreted. MSR values evaluated at pairs of sensors of different orientations give some indication of the azimuth distribution of the microtremor wave field and provide some guidelines on the field procedure when using a limited number of sensors to record SPAC observations.</p>
<p>Observed COHs at site KPK demonstrate the importance of recording longer time series to increase the stability of the observed COHs. The increasing level of statistical noise with increasing frequency at site DBL suggests the SPAC method can be used with a single pair of sensors by restricting its upper frequency limit to the first minimum of the COH. Low values of MSR on observed COHs from most pairs of sensors further strengthen that hypothesis. SPAC observations at site RGB give further insights into the capabilities of the SPAC method to evaluate the SWV profile in limited azimuth microtremor wave-field distribution.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claprood, M., Asten, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090133</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Statistical Validity Control on SPAC Microtremor Observations Recorded with a Restricted Number of Sensors [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>791</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>776</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/792?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Site-Specific and Spatially Distributed Ground-Motion Prediction of Acceleration Spectrum Intensity [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/792?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Acceleration spectrum intensity (ASI), defined as the integral of the pseudospectral acceleration of a ground motion from 0.1 to 0.5&nbsp;sec, was originally proposed as a ground-motion intensity measure (IM) relevant for the seismic response of concrete dams over two decades ago. ASI may be a desirable IM in emerging performance-based earthquake engineering frameworks because its consideration of a range of spectral periods makes it useful for concurrent prediction of acceleration and displacement demands in individual structures and also for regional loss estimation where short-period structures are typically prevalent. This article presents a theoretical basis for predicting ASI, based on prediction equations for spectral acceleration, both for individual sites and spatially distributed regions. ASI is found to have a better predictability than conventional ground-motion IMs such as elastic pseudospectral acceleration at a specific period. Furthermore, for site-specific applications conditional response spectra are derived, which can be considered as the correct target response spectra for ground-motion selection, and the features of these conditional spectra as a function of earthquake magnitude, source-to-site distance, and epsilon are examined. For spatially distributed applications, the intraevent correlation of ASI as a function of the separation distance of two sites is derived and compared to that of other common IMs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bradley, B. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090157</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Site-Specific and Spatially Distributed Ground-Motion Prediction of Acceleration Spectrum Intensity [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>801</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>792</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/802?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of Vibrating Buildings on Free-Field Motion and on Adjacent Structures: The Bonefro (Italy) Case History [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/802?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>During the 2002 Molise sequence, a shock was recorded in a building that suffered heavy damage (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf15">Mucciarelli <I>et&nbsp;al.</I>, 2004</cross-ref>). The availability of this data, along with other similar data, led to the organization of an international workshop for structural engineers aimed at the reproduction of the staged evolution of damage observed (A. Goretti and M. Mucciarelli, unpublished manuscript, 2007). The aim of this present work is to model the damaged building; the adjacent, less damaged building; and a large section of the subsoil. The model should provide some insight into two possible phenomena: (1)&nbsp;the soil&ndash;structure interaction (SSI), that is, the modification of the free-field seismic response induced by the presence of the buildings located on soft soil; and (2)&nbsp;the possible interaction between the two buildings. The study was performed using the 2D Chebyshev spectral element method (SPEM) for a 2D section. The model, with topography, includes the bedrock (limestone) with the overlaying clay layer, circa 30&nbsp;m. The building is modeled by an equivalent shear-wave velocity, which is calculated from its identified mechanical properties. First, the model&rsquo;s ability to reproduce the motions recorded inside and outside the building was verified. Then, one or both of the buildings were removed to study their effect. The influence of the presence of buildings on the free-field motion is about 40% on spectral values, and it is felt up to a distance of about 250&nbsp;m from the buildings. The results also suggest the presence of resonance between buildings.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurenzano, G., Priolo, E., Gallipoli, M. R., Mucciarelli, M., Ponzo, F. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080312</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of Vibrating Buildings on Free-Field Motion and on Adjacent Structures: The Bonefro (Italy) Case History [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>818</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>802</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/819?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Moderate Earthquake Ground-Motion Validation in the San Francisco Bay Area [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/819?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We performed 3D ground-motion simulations for 10 recent small to moderate earthquakes (<I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;4.1&ndash;5.4) in the San Francisco Bay area to evaluate two versions of the USGS 3D velocity model (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf5">Brocher, 2005</cross-ref>; <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf15">Jachens <I>et&nbsp;al.</I>, 2006</cross-ref>; <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf6">Brocher, 2008</cross-ref>). Comparisons were made in terms of modeling phase arrival timing, peak ground-motion amplitudes, and the seismic waveforms. In the simulations we assumed the source parameters reported in the Berkeley Seismological Laboratory (BSL) Moment Tensor Catalog. Broadband seismic data from the Berkeley Digital Seismic Network (BDSN), and strong motion data from the USGS and the California Geological Survey (CGS) strong motion arrays were used in the analysis. The comparison of peak ground velocity (PGV) for both models reveals that both 3D models predict the observed PGV well over four orders of magnitude, and <I>P</I>- and <I>S</I>-wave timing and pseudospectral acceleration (PSA) are well modeled by the 3D structure. While the revised model (model 8.3.0) significantly improved the timing of the first arrival, and the waveform fit is generally good, there remain discrepancies in estimated amplitudes and durations that require improvements to the structure. Nevertheless, from our low-frequency (0.5&nbsp;Hz) analysis we found that the 3D model is suitable for the simulation of PGV to assess the strong shaking hazard of future large earthquakes, because earthquakes larger than <I>M</I>&nbsp;6 have PGV carried by waves of 1 to several seconds period.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, A., Dreger, D. S., Larsen, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090076</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Moderate Earthquake Ground-Motion Validation in the San Francisco Bay Area [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>825</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>819</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/826?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nonlinear Behavior of Strong Surface Waves Trapped in Sedimentary Basins [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/826?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Numerical calculations and observations indicate that surface waves reverberate within sedimentary basins. A site response approach is inapplicable to the nonlinear attenuation of these waves as the energy passes repeatedly through the shallow subsurface. Computed dynamic stresses obtained by using published ShakeOut calculations (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf11">Graves <I>et&nbsp;al.</I>, 2008</cross-ref>) indicate that nonlinear attenuation is modest but not negligible in the Los Angeles, California, basin for large earthquakes on the San Andreas fault. The dominant surface waves have velocity amplitudes of ~1.5 m sec<sup>-1</sup> and periods ~3.5 sec. Around 20% of the total elastic strain energy resides above dynamic/lithostatic stress ratios of 0.2 for both Rayleigh and Love waves where prestressed rock is highly likely to fail somewhat in friction.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sleep, N. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090150</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nonlinear Behavior of Strong Surface Waves Trapped in Sedimentary Basins [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>832</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>826</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/833?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Scattering and Intrinsic Attenuation of Short-Period S Waves in the Gyeongsang Basin, South Korea, Revealed from S-Wave Seismogram Envelopes Based on the Radiative Transfer Theory [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/833?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Examining seismic envelopes for local earthquakes that occurred in the Gyeongsang Basin, South Korea, we estimated coda <I>Q</I> values in the crust and measured the total scattering coefficients for frequency bands 1&ndash;2, 2&ndash;4, 4&ndash;8, and 8&ndash;16&nbsp;Hz using the Monte Carlo simulation method based on radiative transfer theory. In the seismic envelope synthesis, we assumed acoustic multiple isotropic scattering and adopted a depth-dependent <I>S</I>-wave velocity model that is slightly modified from a receiver function result in the middle of the study region. The estimated total scattering coefficients range from 3.8<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>-3</sup> to <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="833eq1"></inline-fig></f> at 1&ndash;16&nbsp;Hz, which agrees well with the average values in the crust. These values are corresponding to less than 0.5 of seismic albedo. This result represents that intrinsic absorption is a dominant contributor to the attenuation process for all frequency bands in the Gyeongsang Basin.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, W. S., Yun, S., Do, J.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090149</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Scattering and Intrinsic Attenuation of Short-Period S Waves in the Gyeongsang Basin, South Korea, Revealed from S-Wave Seismogram Envelopes Based on the Radiative Transfer Theory [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>840</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>833</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/841?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Segmentally Iterative Ray Tracing in Complex 2D and 3D Heterogeneous Block Models [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/841?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We describe a complex geologic model as an aggregate of arbitrarily shaped blocks separated by cubic splines in 2D and triangulated interfaces in 3D. Recently we have introduced a segmentally iterative ray-tracing (SIRT) method based on Fermat&rsquo;s principle of stationary travel time, which has been documented to be robust and fast for a complex block model with a constant velocity defined in each block. In this work, we extend the constant velocity to a generally continuous distribution with an analytical expression of travel time, and develop SIRT in the redefined velocity distribution. As a three-point perturbation scheme, SIRT requires an explicit analytical travel time between two intersection points expressed as a function of coordinates of the two points. In these situations, we derive a general midpoint perturbation formula, and further a detailed perturbation formula for familiar media with a constant velocity gradient. SIRT is a scheme in which we perturb the intersection points of an initial-guess ray path in sequence by the first-order explicit formulas instead of using traditional iterative methods. A key consideration is the fact that the number of intersection points may be variable during the iteration process. Numerical tests demonstrate that SIRT is effective in implementing kinematic two-point ray tracing in complex 2D and 3D heterogeneous media.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, T., Zhang, Z., Gao, E., Xu, G., Sun, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090155</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Segmentally Iterative Ray Tracing in Complex 2D and 3D Heterogeneous Block Models [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>850</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>841</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/851?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lg Attenuation in a Region with Both Continental and Oceanic Environments [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/851?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The crustally-guided shear wave, <I>Lg</I>, is typically the strongest phase at regional distances. <I>Lg</I> phases are analyzed often for estimation of magnitudes of regional events. The variation of <I>Lg</I> in regions with both continental and oceanic environments has been rarely investigated. We investigate <I>Lg</I> attenuation in a plate-margin area around Korea and Japan that is encompassed by seas and oceans. The mean quality factor of <I>Lg</I> at 1&nbsp;Hz (<I>Q</I><SUB>0</SUB>) is 498. The geometrical-spreading exponent term is estimated as 0.75. These observations characterize the study region as a high attenuation region compared to typical intraplate continental regions. Low-<I>Q</I> regions are widely developed over the Japanese islands, with some spotted high-<I>Q</I> regions. Relatively high <I>Q</I> is observed in most regions of the Korean Peninsula except a southeastern part where a Cretaceous volcanic-sediment basin exists. The high-<I>Q</I> values are close to the typical <I>Q</I> value in continental crust. Significantly low <I>Q</I> of 100 or less is observed in most oceanic regions including the East Sea (Sea of Japan), the Pacific Ocean, and the South China Sea. The high attenuation of <I>Lg</I> in oceanic regions suggests possible underestimation of magnitudes of oceanic events. Thus, it appears that proper correction of <I>Lg</I> amplitude is highly desired for accurate estimation of magnitudes of regional oceanic events.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hong, T.-K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lg Attenuation in a Region with Both Continental and Oceanic Environments [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>858</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>851</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/859?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Earthquake Source Scaling: m1 versus Other Magnitude Scales [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/859?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The <b>m</b><SUB>1</SUB> scale has been defined (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf19">Chen and Atkinson, 2002</cross-ref>) in the frequency domain, where the Fourier acceleration amplitude at 1&nbsp;Hz is employed. The <b>m</b><SUB>hf</SUB> and <b>M</b><SUB>lp</SUB> magnitude scales are determined accordingly with the high-frequency acceleration spectrum and the low-frequency displacement spectrum, respectively. This article deals with the similarity and correlations of these new magnitude scales with the popularly used moment magnitude (<b>M</b>) and the magnitude scales defined in the time domain, such as <I>m</I><SUB><I>b</I></SUB>, <I>M</I><SUB>S</SUB>, and <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB>, among others. The magnitudes <b>m</b><SUB>1</SUB>, <b>m</b><SUB>hf</SUB>, and <b>M</b><SUB>lp</SUB> are associated with intermediate-, high-, and low-frequency bands, respectively, estimated from spectra corrected for geometric and anelastic scattering effects. Comparisons between the magnitude scales demonstrate that <b>m</b><SUB>1</SUB> is a reliable indicator of earthquake size, which is not only well correlated with the local or regional magnitude but also is a good measure of the moment magnitude for at least small-to-moderate earthquakes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090167</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Earthquake Source Scaling: m1 versus Other Magnitude Scales [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>867</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>859</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/868?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of Regional-Distance Location Calibration Using a Multiple-Event Location Algorithm [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/868?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We test the use of a multiple-event seismic location method to improve epicenter accuracy estimates. Regional arrival-time observations of 74 Nevada Test Site explosions with known locations comprise the test data set. We investigate epicenter accuracy as a function of the number of events in the multiple-event system that are constrained at the known hypocenter (calibration), the effect of distance between calibration and unconstrained events, and the use of velocity models with varying travel-time prediction accuracy. Further, we test the utility of using <I>a posteriori</I> travel-time residuals to assess location and travel-time prediction accuracy. We find that constraining one event at the known hypocenter reduces epicenter error for all other events by 58% on average compared to locations produced without constraining events. The incremental improvement in epicenter accuracy rapidly diminishes as more hypocenters are constrained, and incremental location improvement is minimal when the number of constrained hypocenters exceeds 10. Events closest to a constrained event exhibit small location bias. Distinct epicenter bias occurs when the distance between the calibration event and the relocated event is greater than a few tens of kilometers. Last, we confirm that metrics based on <I>a posteriori</I> travel-time residuals are poor indicators of both epicenter accuracy and velocity model-based travel-time prediction accuracy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anderson, M. L., Myers, S. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090145</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of Regional-Distance Location Calibration Using a Multiple-Event Location Algorithm [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>875</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>868</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/876?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping the {eta}-Value and the Test Results on the Hyper-Gutenberg-Richter Relation for Microseismicity around the Japanese Islands [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/876?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The coexistence of two earthquake groups, each following the Gutenberg&ndash;Richter (GR) relation with different <I>b</I>-values (hereafter called the hyper-GR group), is discussed, and an algorithm is developed to recognize them. I show how the <I></I>-value proposed in 1978 by Utsu, who introduced the parameter representing an upward or downward convex curvature of frequency-magnitude distribution (FMD), differs significantly between GR and hyper-GR groups. The spatial variation of the FMD of earthquakes down to <I>M</I>&nbsp;2.2 in and around the Japanese islands is studied using the algorithm and the <I></I>-value. The <I></I>-value for one year preceding the <I>M</I>&nbsp;7.4 Kii-Hanto-Oki earthquake of 2004 was high, displaying an upward convex curvature of FMD in and around the source region. The hyper-GR group was found to be a significantly better distribution model than the GR group for the seismicity greater than <I>M</I>&nbsp;2.15, but hyper-GR was not significantly better for seismicity greater than <I>M</I>&nbsp;3 of greater sampling radius. Further study is required to judge if it is a precursor to the event.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tsukakoshi, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080307</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping the {eta}-Value and the Test Results on the Hyper-Gutenberg-Richter Relation for Microseismicity around the Japanese Islands [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>881</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>876</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/882?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Vallo di Diano Fault System: New Evidence for an Active Range-Bounding Fault in Southern Italy Using Shallow, High-Resolution Seismic Profiling [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/882?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Range-bounding normal faults can present significant challenges for seismic exploration. This is the case of the fault system bounding the Vallo di Diano, the largest intermountain basin in the southern Apennines seismic belt. Industry reflection profiles define the large-scale structure of the basin but barely image the shallow fault system due to unfavorable topographic and near-surface conditions along the foothills of the eastern range. We present two high-resolution (HR) wide-aperture profiles recorded at the eastern margin of the basin across unreported scarps that affect Middle&ndash;Late Pleistocene alluvial fans and slope debris. The survey is aimed at identifying possible recent faulting across these challenging terrains and at understanding the relationship between shallow structures and the master range-bounding fault at depth. Common depth point processing of wide-aperture reflection data and first-arrival travel-time tomography provide detailed images of the upper 200&ndash;300&nbsp;m and sounding evidence of recent activity along previously unknown splays of the fault system. These splays dissect the Mesozoic limestone bedrock and alluvial-fan sequences, affecting their depositional pattern. Very high resolution <I>V</I><SUB><I>P</I></SUB> and reflectivity images also give hints of possible coseismic surface faulting in Holocene colluvia. These results have relevant implications for the evaluation of the seismogenic potential of the range-bounding fault system and for seismic hazard assessment of the densely urbanized Vallo di Diano basin.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruno, P. P., Improta, L., Castiello, A., Villani, F., Montone, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090210</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Vallo di Diano Fault System: New Evidence for an Active Range-Bounding Fault in Southern Italy Using Shallow, High-Resolution Seismic Profiling [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>890</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>882</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/891?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Investigation into the Seismic Potential of the Irrawaddy Region, Northern Sunda Arc [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/891?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Tearing and detachment of subducted slabs in subduction zones have been an important focus of geoscience research as they have serious seismic hazard implications. Based on evidence, including the pattern of seismicity, great earthquake ruptures, tomographic studies, back-arc volcanism, and trench morphology, we suggest that the lack of sufficient width of subducting Indian plate slab under the Irrawaddy region (between latitudes 15&deg; N and 18&deg; N) of the Sunda arc due to the presence of a tear in the subducting Indo-Australian slab makes the region aseismic. The lack of slab there also limits the potential for major and great earthquakes to be generated. Accordingly, the seismic and tsunami potential of this region may not be as high as it is in the Andaman and Arakan regions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kundu, B., Gahalaut, V. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090081</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Investigation into the Seismic Potential of the Irrawaddy Region, Northern Sunda Arc [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>895</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>891</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/896?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comment on "Is There a Basis for Preferring Characteristic Earthquakes over a Gutenberg-Richter Distribution in Probabilistic Earthquake Forecasting" by Tom Parsons and Eric L. Geist [Comment and Reply]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/896?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In their short note <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf5">Parsons and Geist (2009)</cross-ref> claim that the use of a Gutenberg&ndash;Richter relationship is justified for describing the magnitude&ndash;frequency relationship of single faults. I will show that their conclusions are biased. The assumption implicitly made by the authors that single faults can produce an uncountable number of earthquakes of different magnitudes directly leads to the consequence that a Gutenberg&ndash;Richter relationship describes such a data set (created by simulation) reasonably well.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Klugel, J.-U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090170</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comment on "Is There a Basis for Preferring Characteristic Earthquakes over a Gutenberg-Richter Distribution in Probabilistic Earthquake Forecasting" by Tom Parsons and Eric L. Geist [Comment and Reply]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>897</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>896</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Comment and Reply</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/2/898?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to "Comment on 'Is There a Basis for Preferring Characteristic Earthquakes over a Gutenberg-Richter Distribution in Probabilistic Earthquake Forecasting?' by Tom Parsons and Eric L. Geist" by Jens-Uwe Klugel [Comment and Reply]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/2/898?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parsons, T., Geist, E. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:36 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090327</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to "Comment on 'Is There a Basis for Preferring Characteristic Earthquakes over a Gutenberg-Richter Distribution in Probabilistic Earthquake Forecasting?' by Tom Parsons and Eric L. Geist" by Jens-Uwe Klugel [Comment and Reply]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>899</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>898</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Comment and Reply</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Source and Site Characteristics of Earthquakes That Have Caused Exceptional Ground Accelerations and Velocities [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study investigates the characteristics of the free-field strong-motion records that have yielded the 100 largest peak accelerations and the 100 largest peak velocities in a relatively complete database of accelerograms recorded through the summer of 2007. The peak is defined as the maximum zero-to-peak amplitude of the acceleration or velocity vector during the strong shaking. This compilation includes 35 records with peak acceleration greater than 1<I>g</I> (980 cm/sec<sup>2</sup>) and 40 records with peak velocities greater than 100 cm/sec. The results sample an estimated 150,000 instrument-years of strong-motion recordings. The geometric mean of the two horizontal components of acceleration or velocity, as used in many ground-motion prediction equations, is typically 0.76&nbsp;times the magnitude of this vector peak. Accelerations in the top 100 come from earthquakes as small as magnitude 4.8, while velocities in the top 100 all come from earthquakes with magnitude 5.7 or larger. These records are dominated by crustal earthquakes with thrust, oblique-thrust, or strike-slip mechanisms. Normal faulting mechanisms in crustal earthquakes constitute under 5% of the records in the databases searched and an even smaller percentage of the 100 largest acceleration or velocity records. All National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program site categories have contributed exceptional records, in proportions similar to the extent that they are represented in larger databases.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anderson, J. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080375</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Source and Site Characteristics of Earthquakes That Have Caused Exceptional Ground Accelerations and Velocities [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>36</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/37?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of Fault Rupture Characteristics on Near-Fault Strong Ground Motions [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/37?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The effect of fault rupture characteristics on near-fault strong ground motions is investigated using a kinematic modeling approach in an attempt to identify physical processes that lead to specific ground-motion patterns. The shear-stress distribution on the causative fault plane of four well-documented seismic events (i.e., 1979 Imperial Valley, 1985 Michoacan, 1989 Loma Prieta, and 1999 Izmit) is calculated based on fault slip models available in the literature using the methodology proposed by <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf11">Bouchon (1997)</cross-ref> for stress field computations. In order to associate the fault rupture characteristics (i.e., slip, rupture velocity, state of stress) of the investigated earthquakes with near-fault ground motions generated by the events, forward ground-motion simulations are performed using the discrete wavenumber representation method and the concept of the <I>S</I>-wave isochrones is exploited. The results indicate that the seismic energy radiated from the high-isochrone-velocity region of the fault arrives at the receiver within a time interval that coincides with the time window of the long-period ground-motion pulse recorded at the site. Furthermore, the near-fault ground-motion pulses are strongly correlated with large slip on the fault plane locally driven by high stress drop. In addition, the local rupture velocity seems to be inversely correlated to the spatial distribution of the strength excess over the fault plane confirming findings of previous studies. For various events the area of the fault that contributes to the formation of the near-fault pulse encompasses more than one patch of significant moment release (subevent) (e.g., 1979 Imperial Valley, 1989 Loma Prieta). This observation explains why a dislocation model with average properties (i.e., slip, rise time, etc.) reproduces successfully near-fault ground motions for strike-slip faults and for dip-slip faults with intermediate-to-large earthquake magnitudes (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf1">Aki, 1979</cross-ref>). However, for very large earthquakes, such as megathrust events on subduction zones (e.g., 1985 Michoacan), the fault region that contributes to the pulse formation encompasses individual subevents and, consequently, cracklike slip functions (rather than dislocation models) may be more appropriate for the simulation of the near-fault ground motions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mavroeidis, G. P., Papageorgiou, A. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of Fault Rupture Characteristics on Near-Fault Strong Ground Motions [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>58</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>37</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/59?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Toward Understanding Subtle Instrumentation Effects Associated with Weak Seismic Events in the Near Field [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/59?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Broadband observations of small earthquakes at short epicentral distances reveal a mixture of near-field effects and instrumental artifacts. We investigated these phenomena at a station equipped with an STS-2 and CMG-40T sensor situated almost above shallow <I>M</I>&nbsp;3.0 to 3.8 events (peak ground acceleration 2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>-1</sup> m/sec<sup>2</sup>). The horizontal components were systematically accompanied by tiltlike disturbances, and the tilt obtained from the STS-2 records exceeded more than 10 times the values predicted by the source model. We also observed a so far uncommonly recognized type of disturbance, whose shape is the first derivative of the tiltlike disturbance. The most likely explanation seems to be clipping of high-frequency signal peaks within the sensor system. A computational model of a broadband feedback velocimeter as a linear dynamic system with saturation proved this interpretation on a qualitative level. Generally, any asymmetry in the transfer of high frequencies in the feedback velocimeter would produce a long-period disturbance of this type. Users of near-fault broadband velocigrams may numerically simulate the disturbances, without any knowledge of their physical nature, and subtract them from the records. The decontaminated records still may have a strange, bow-shaped form, related to the near-field ramp and the static displacement (of the order of 1<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>-5</sup> m in this article). The effects studied in this article seem to have a general character, for apparently any feedback-controlled broadband velocimeter.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zahradnik, J., Plesinger, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090087</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Toward Understanding Subtle Instrumentation Effects Associated with Weak Seismic Events in the Near Field [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>73</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>59</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/74?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Age of Unstable Bedrock Landforms Southwest of Yucca Mountain, Nevada, and Implications for Past Ground Motions [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/74?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We determine minimum exposure ages for unstable outcrops at three sites in Amargosa Desert, southwestern Nevada, including a site at the southern end of Yucca Mountain. Varnish microlamination dating techniques provide minimum exposure ages of 12.5&ndash;36&nbsp;k.y. for the unstable outcrops of welded tuff, including a 24&nbsp;k.y. age for the south Yucca Mountain site. The youngest exposure age (12.5&nbsp;k.y.) is found at the site located only 10&nbsp;km from the Death Valley&ndash;Furnace Creek fault, suggesting outcrops may be more frequently modified when close to major active earthquake sources. A simplistic stability assessment of the south Yucca Mountain outcrops suggests peak ground accelerations (PGAs) may not have exceeded about 1<I>g</I> (uncertainty bounds 0.5&ndash;2<I>g</I>) in at least 24&nbsp;k.y. A PGA of 1<I>g</I> is consistent with the predicted 24&nbsp;k.y. return period PGAs from the near decade-old Yucca Mountain probabilistic seismic hazard (PSH) model, except for the ninety-fifth percentile and above. We gain confidence in our interpretations by additionally observing: (1)&nbsp;minimal damage to the south Yucca Mountain outcrops from a recent moderate earthquake that is estimated to have produced a PGA of less than 0.1<I>g</I> there (i.e., motions less than 0.5<I>g</I> do not significantly damage the outcrops); and (2)&nbsp;severe damage to similar volcanic outcrops associated with PGAs of the order 0.5&ndash;1<I>g</I> near a nuclear blast site from the 1960s. These observations support our suggestion that PGAs greater than 0.5&ndash;1<I>g</I> have not occurred at the south Yucca Mountain site for a time period of at least 24&nbsp;k.y. Significant seismic events that substantially modify the outcrops and produce associated rubble fields may therefore occur on longer time scales.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stirling, M., Ledgerwood, J., Liu, T., Apted, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080359</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Age of Unstable Bedrock Landforms Southwest of Yucca Mountain, Nevada, and Implications for Past Ground Motions [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>86</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>74</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/87?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Application of Generalized Pareto Distribution to Constrain Uncertainty in Peak Ground Accelerations [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/87?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) has become standard practice to characterize earthquake ground-motion hazard and to develop ground-motion inputs for seismic design and performance analyses. One emerging issue is the application of PSHA at low annual exceedance probabilities, particularly the characterization of scatter (aleatory variability) in the recorded ground-motion parameters, including peak ground acceleration (PGA). Lognormal distributions are commonly used to model ground-motion variability. However, a lognormal distribution, when unbounded, can yield a nonzero probability for unrealistically high ground-motion values. In this article, we evaluate the appropriateness of the lognormal assumption for low-probability ground motions by examining the tail behavior of the PGA recordings from the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research&ndash;Next Generation Attenuation of Ground Motions (PEER NGA) database and the PGA residuals using Abrahamson&ndash;Silva NGA ground-motion relations. Our analyses show that the tail portion of the PGA and the residual data do not always follow a lognormal distribution and are instead often better characterized by the generalized Pareto distribution (GPD). We propose using a composite distribution model (CDM) that consists of a lognormal distribution (up to a threshold value of ground-motion residual) combined with GPD for the tail region. We demonstrate implications of the CDM in PSHA using a simple example and GPD parameters derived from the residual fit. Our results show that, at low annual exceedance probabilities, the CDM yields considerably lower PGA values than the unbounded lognormal distribution. It also produces smoother hazard curves than truncated lognormal distributions because the PGA increases asymptotically with a decreasing probability level. The presented approach is readily adapted to spectral accelerations and other ground-motion parameters.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huyse, L., Chen, R., Stamatakos, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080265</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Application of Generalized Pareto Distribution to Constrain Uncertainty in Peak Ground Accelerations [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>101</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>87</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/102?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Inelastic Seismic Demand of Real versus Simulated Ground-Motion Records for Cascadia Subduction Earthquakes [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/102?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Nonlinear dynamic analysis of structures requires strong ground motion time histories (accelerograms) as input. The inherent scarcity of recorded ground motions for specific conditions (magnitude, distance, region, and site) makes utilization of alternatives unavoidable; such alternatives include simulated records and modified real records. There are many simulation methods available, but there is often a preference to using stochastic simulation methods, if justifiable, due to the ease with which many records can be simulated in a generic way. However, there are concerns that such simulated records may not produce similar nonlinear response in structures as real records (or modified real records) due to the lack of realistic phasing and other record characteristics, including peaks and troughs effects and response spectral shape effects. This study investigates peak nonlinear responses of inelastic single-degree-of-freedom systems with different hysteretic characteristics subjected to sets of stochastically simulated records, lightly modified real records, and scaled-real records; the former two of which were proposed by <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf1">Atkinson and Macias (2009)</cross-ref> as representative of expected ground motions for Cascadia subduction earthquakes of <b>M</b> 8.5 at Vancouver, Victoria, and Seattle.</p>
<p>We conclude that (1)&nbsp;the peak nonlinear responses due to the modified records and the scaled-real records are similar if the peaks and troughs effects and response spectral shape effects are taken into account adequately in the choice of scaling factors for the real records; and (2)&nbsp;the peak nonlinear responses due to the simulated and modified records are similar. These findings, though obtained based on limited sets of ground-motion records, are in agreement with previous studies and highlight the need for judicious choices in cases involving the scaling of records. The results also suggest that stochastically simulated records may be an appropriate way to capture overall response potential for both linear and nonlinear structural systems, at least over a range of periods from 0.1 to 2&nbsp;sec.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atkinson, G. M., Goda, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Inelastic Seismic Demand of Real versus Simulated Ground-Motion Records for Cascadia Subduction Earthquakes [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>115</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>102</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/116?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ground-Motion Simulations of the 2004 Mw 6.4 Les Saintes, Guadeloupe, Earthquake Using Ten Smaller Events [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/116?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The validity and the stability of a ground-motion simulation method based on the recordings of a single small event as an empirical Green&rsquo;s function (EGF) is tested on a seismic crisis that occurred 25&nbsp;km offshore of the Guadeloupe Islands (Caribbean arc). We aim to determine if (1)&nbsp;the method enables us to reproduce the observed ground motion, (2)&nbsp;the choice of the small event taken as an EGF is crucial for the simulations, and (3)&nbsp;the method provides valuable results compared with ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs). We have successively used the recordings of 10 small earthquakes (<I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;4.2&ndash;5.1) to simulate the ground motions generated by the mainshock (<I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;6.4), at 12 accelerometric stations. We first determined the moment and focal mechanisms of the 10 events chosen as an EGF, as well as the stress-drop ratio <I>C</I> between each of these events and the mainshock. Then, we simulated 500 accelerograms for each EGF and each station. A good reproduction of the mainshock response spectra, the peak ground acceleration, and the duration of the signal was obtained using 9 out of 10 EGFs. For stations with site effects, the results obtained are much closer to the real data than values given by the GMPEs on sediment sites. In the case of blind predictive simulation, we propose to calibrate the stress-drop ratio <I>C</I> through a comparison between the simulated response spectra on rock site stations and the values predicted by GMPEs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Courboulex, F., Converset, J., Balestra, J., Delouis, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080372</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ground-Motion Simulations of the 2004 Mw 6.4 Les Saintes, Guadeloupe, Earthquake Using Ten Smaller Events [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>130</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>116</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/131?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dynamic Rupture Models for the Southern San Andreas Fault [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/131?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Dynamic rupture, and resultant ground motions up to 0.25&nbsp;Hz, are simulated for an <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;7.6 earthquake on the southern San Andreas fault. Spontaneous rupture is modeled with slip-weakening friction, and 3D viscoelastic wave solutions are computed with a support-operator numerical method. The initial traction model is derived from inversions of the <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;7.3 1992 Landers strong ground-motion records, and borrows heavily from that used for the TeraShake2 simulations by <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf33">Olsen <I>et&nbsp;al.</I> (2008)</cross-ref>. Heterogeneity in the traction model leads to focusing of the rupture front, and the focusing produces cases of supershear rupture velocity in asperities (areas of high initial traction), as well as cases of high peak slip rate and cohesive zone contraction in antiasperities. Separate solutions are computed for version 3.0 and 4.0, respectively, of the Southern California Earthquake Center Community Velocity Model (SCEC-CVM). We also compare the case of a flat ground surface (a common simplification made for finite-difference simulations) to the case of the ground surface conformed to regional topography. The overall distribution of simulated ground motion intensity is consistent with that derived from the empirical model of <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf8">Campbell and Bozorgnia (2008)</cross-ref>, in the sense that the bulk of simulated pseudospectral velocity (PSV) values are within the 68% confidence intervals of the empirical model. Simulated PSVs corresponding to low probability in the empirical model are principally associated with basin wave-guide and directivity effects. An important example, first identified by the TeraShake1 simulations (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf32">Olsen <I>et&nbsp;al.</I>, 2006</cross-ref>), is the stronger than expected ground motions at the site of Montebello due to a basin wave-guide effect. We find that this effect is lessened for version 4.0 of the SCEC-CVM, relative to version 3.0, due to a shallower model for the Chino basin.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ely, G. P., Day, S. M., Minster, J.-B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090187</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dynamic Rupture Models for the Southern San Andreas Fault [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>150</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>131</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/151?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nonlinear Soil Response of a Borehole Station Based on One-Dimensional Inversion during the 2005 Fukuoka Prefecture Western Offshore Earthquake [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/151?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The objective of this article is to present the nonlinear response of a soft sedimentary site based on a one-dimensional inversion by a genetic algorithm of the shear-wave velocity structure and damping factors of a borehole soil column during the 2005 Fukuoka Prefecture Western Offshore earthquake. First, we confirm that, according to the source rupture mechanism, the major and minor axes in the horizontal plane at the borehole station are the transverse and radial directions, respectively. Then, in order to corroborate in the linear domain the <I>S</I>-wave transfer function of the borehole&rsquo;s logging, we perform time-dependent spectral ratios analyses on small aftershocks. Finally, we show qualitative evidence of nonlinearity during the mainshock associated with a significant shift toward low frequencies of several resonant modes, and we evaluate the degree of nonlinearity by inverting the shear-wave velocity structure and damping factors. Because of a directional effect present only in the major axis around 8&nbsp;Hz, which prevents the use of the conventional objective function that minimizes the integrated residuals between observed and theoretical ratios, we introduce a simple objective function that depends only on peaks&rsquo; frequency and amplitude. The efficiency of the objective function and the robustness of the inversion are shown by performing eight independent inversions converging to very similar minima.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Martin, F., Kawase, H., Modaressi-Farahmand Razavi, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090125</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nonlinear Soil Response of a Borehole Station Based on One-Dimensional Inversion during the 2005 Fukuoka Prefecture Western Offshore Earthquake [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>171</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>151</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/172?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Defining a Standard Rock Site: Propositions Based on the KiK-net Database [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/172?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Site-over-reference techniques are commonly used to characterize site effects. In these techniques, the choice of reference site significantly affects the amplification estimates. Hence, a clear definition of a standard reference rock site is necessary. The present article tests various standard rock site definitions using the KiK-net Japanese database. Two parameters, the mean shear-wave velocity over the first 30&nbsp;m (<I>V</I><SUB><I>S</I>30</SUB>) and the fundamental resonance frequency (<I>f</I><SUB>0</SUB>), are used to define a standard rock site. The variability of the shear-wave velocity profiles and of the estimated rock site response for five different categories, defined according to <I>V</I><SUB><I>S</I>30</SUB> and <I>f</I><SUB>0</SUB> values, are derived and compared. It is shown that the criterion commonly used in building codes establishing a lower limit of <I>V</I><SUB><I>S</I>30</SUB> (of about 800 m/sec for rock or soft rock categories) groups a wide variety of shear-wave velocity profiles and a corresponding wide variety in site amplification. A more restrictive, twin criterion, combining (lower) limits on the <I>V</I><SUB><I>S</I>30</SUB> and <I>f</I><SUB>0</SUB> values, significantly reduces the variability in terms of amplification and the amplified frequency band of the rock response. This criterion is thus proposed as a definition of a standard rock site, and its practical applicability is discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cadet, H., Bard, P.-Y., Rodriguez-Marek, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090078</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Defining a Standard Rock Site: Propositions Based on the KiK-net Database [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>195</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>172</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/196?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Spectral Decay Parameter Kappa in Northeastern Sonora, Mexico [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/196?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We calculated the spectral decay parameter (<I></I>) in the southern Basin and Range province, using records from earthquakes located near the Pit&aacute;ycachi fault. We found that for a given distance and recording site the values of <I></I> vary considerably, possibly as a result of the lateral heterogeneity of the crust. Individual values of <I></I> do not show a clear trend with magnitude, nor with the average values of <I></I>. The average values of <I></I> tend to increase with distance up to about 70&ndash;80&nbsp;km and then to decrease between 80 and 100&nbsp;km, suggesting higher <I>S</I>-wave attenuation at shallow depths and lower attenuation for deeper paths. We analyzed the possible dependence of <I></I> on earthquake size by determining empirical curves that describe the behavior of <I></I> with distance and magnitude. Our results indicate that <I></I> is independent of earthquake size within the magnitude range (<I>M</I>&lt;3.5) of the events analyzed. The nonparametric curves also provided site-specific estimates of <I></I> near the surface (<I></I><SUB>0</SUB>) for the stations and groups of stations analyzed. We found that the average <I></I><SUB>0</SUB> value of 0.04&nbsp;sec in northeastern Sonora is similar to values of <I></I><SUB>0</SUB> reported in other regions. We conclude that <I></I><SUB>0</SUB> depends not only on the rock type but also on the degree of fracturing and erosion of the rocks near the recording site.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez, A. I., Castro, R. R., Huerta, C. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090049</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Spectral Decay Parameter Kappa in Northeastern Sonora, Mexico [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>206</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/207?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Distribution of Seismic Velocities and Attenuation in the Crust beneath the North Anatolian Fault (Turkey) from Local Earthquake Tomography [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/207?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We investigate the crustal structure beneath the western part of the North Anatolian fault zone (NAFZ), an area where at least five damaging earthquakes occurred during the twentieth century. This study is based on local earthquake tomography using the data from aftershocks of the Izmit event (17 August 1999, <I>M</I> 7.4) recorded by stations of permanent and temporary networks. We derive the distribution of <I>V</I><SUB><I>P</I></SUB>, <I>V</I><SUB><I>S</I></SUB>, and the <I>V</I><SUB><I>P</I></SUB>/<I>V</I><SUB><I>S</I></SUB> ratio based on the iterative inversion for both <I>V</I><SUB><I>P</I></SUB>-<I>V</I><SUB><I>S</I></SUB> and <I>V</I><SUB><I>P</I></SUB>-<I>V</I><SUB><I>P</I></SUB>/<I>V</I><SUB><I>S</I></SUB> using the LOTOS code. Innovatively, in this study we perform an inversion for frequency-dependent <I>S</I>-wave attenuation (1/<I>Q</I><SUB><I>S</I></SUB>). The reliability of the results is assessed through synthetic tests. The distributions of the resulting seismic parameters (<I>V</I><SUB><I>P</I></SUB>, <I>V</I><SUB><I>S</I></SUB>, <I>V</I><SUB><I>P</I></SUB>/<I>V</I><SUB><I>S</I></SUB>, and <I>Q</I><SUB><I>S</I></SUB>) highlight important geodynamical features in the study area. The low-velocity and high-attenuation patterns mostly correlate with the fracturing zones of the NAFZ. Low velocities are also observed beneath the main sedimentary basins (e.g., Adapazari, D&uuml;zce, and Kuzuluk). High-velocity and low-attenuation patterns correlate with blocks presumed to be rigid (Kocaeli, Armutlu, and Almacik blocks). The rupture traces of the largest earthquakes in this area pass generally in the transition areas between high and low velocities, while moderate and weak seismicity is mostly concentrated in low-velocity areas. Based on these results we propose and discuss the role that the Almacik block could have played in producing the largest earthquakes in the study area in the twentieth century.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koulakov, I., Bindi, D., Parolai, S., Grosser, H., Milkereit, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090105</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Distribution of Seismic Velocities and Attenuation in the Crust beneath the North Anatolian Fault (Turkey) from Local Earthquake Tomography [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>224</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/225?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A California Statewide Three-Dimensional Seismic Velocity Model from Both Absolute and Differential Times [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/225?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We obtain a seismic velocity model of the California crust and uppermost mantle using a regional-scale double-difference tomography algorithm. We begin by using absolute arrival-time picks to solve for a coarse three-dimensional (3D) <I>P</I> velocity (<I>V</I><SUB><I>P</I></SUB>) model with a uniform 30&nbsp;km horizontal node spacing, which we then use as the starting model for a finer-scale inversion using double-difference tomography applied to absolute and differential pick times. For computational reasons, we split the state into 5 subregions with a grid spacing of 10 to 20&nbsp;km and assemble our final statewide <I>V</I><SUB><I>P</I></SUB> model by stitching together these local models. We also solve for a statewide <I>S</I>-wave model using <I>S</I> picks from both the Southern California Seismic Network and USArray, assuming a starting model based on the <I>V</I><SUB><I>P</I></SUB> results and a <I>V</I><SUB><I>P</I></SUB>/<I>V</I><SUB><I>S</I></SUB> ratio of 1.732. Our new model has improved areal coverage compared with previous models, extending 570&nbsp;km in the SW&ndash;NE direction and 1320&nbsp;km in the NW&ndash;SE direction. It also extends to greater depth due to the inclusion of substantial data at large epicentral distances. Our <I>V</I><SUB><I>P</I></SUB> model generally agrees with previous separate regional models for northern and southern California, but we also observe some new features, such as high-velocity anomalies at shallow depths in the Klamath Mountains and Mount Shasta area, somewhat slow velocities in the northern Coast Ranges, and slow anomalies beneath the Sierra Nevada at midcrustal and greater depths. This model can be applied to a variety of regional-scale studies in California, such as developing a unified statewide earthquake location catalog and performing regional waveform modeling.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, G., Thurber, C. H., Zhang, H., Hauksson, E., Shearer, P. M., Waldhauser, F., Brocher, T. M., Hardebeck, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A California Statewide Three-Dimensional Seismic Velocity Model from Both Absolute and Differential Times [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>240</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>225</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/241?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Macroseismic Interpretation of the 1812 Earthquakes in Venezuela Using Intensity Uncertainties and A Priori Fault-Strike Information [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/241?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We applied the <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf8">Bakun and Wentworth (1997)</cross-ref> method to the 26 March 1812 Venezuelan earthquake. Previous studies have shown that it had at least two large subevents, one associated with the Bocon&oacute; fault and an intensity center between Barquisimeto and San Felipe, the other associated with the San Sebasti&aacute;n fault near Caracas. We used the method with two modifications. First, we introduced intensity intervals to account for the uncertainties associated with historical information. Second, we incorporated a correction that considers the fault&rsquo;s strike, but not its actual position. These modifications were tested with three earthquakes: the 1989 Loma Prieta; a 1980 <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;5.2 event in T&aacute;chira, Venezuela; and the 1967 earthquake in Caracas, <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;6.6. The third one was important for the interpretation of the 1812 Caracas subevent. For the Barquisimeto&ndash;San Felipe subevent we obtained <I>M</I><SUB>WI</SUB>&nbsp;7.4&plusmn;0.35, and an intensity center 10.20&deg;&nbsp;N, 69.95&deg;&nbsp;W that lies between Barquisimeto and San Felipe. Our preferred rupture length was between 90 and 100&nbsp;km. The Caracas subevent had <I>M</I><SUB>WI</SUB>&nbsp;7.1&plusmn;0.33, with an intensity center 10.60&deg;&nbsp;N, 67.10&deg;&nbsp;W, close to the Venezuelan north coast. The expected rupture length was on the order of 70&nbsp;km.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choy, J. E., Palme, C., Guada, C., Morandi, M., Klarica, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080345</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Macroseismic Interpretation of the 1812 Earthquakes in Venezuela Using Intensity Uncertainties and A Priori Fault-Strike Information [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>255</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>241</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/256?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rupture Process of the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku, Japan, Earthquake Derived from Near-Source Strong-Motion Records [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/256?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We derive the rupture process of the 2008 Iwate&ndash;Miyagi Nairiku, Japan, earthquake (<I>M</I><SUB>JMA</SUB>&nbsp;7.2), during which the largest ground acceleration to date, namely, 4022 cm/sec<sup>2</sup>, was recorded at a hanging-wall station, IWTH25 station of KiK-net, just above the hypocenter. Velocity waveform data (0.1&ndash;1&nbsp;Hz) at 14 strong-motion stations of K-NET and KiK-net, including the borehole records of IWTH25, are inverted using the multi-time-window linear waveform inversion method. We assume a horizontally layered velocity structure model having low-velocity subsurface layers for each station in order to calculate the Green&rsquo;s functions. The waveform inversion indicates that there are two major slip patches. One patch extends from the hypocenter to the southern shallower part of the fault. A particularly large slip area in this patch is centered approximately 8&nbsp;km to the south of the hypocenter with a maximum slip of 6.2&nbsp;m, the area ruptured between 4 and 9&nbsp;sec after the initial break. The other patch with smaller slip is located in the northern part, which broke after the rupture of the southern slip patch. The initial 0&ndash;4&nbsp;sec rupture occurred beneath IWTH25, contributing to the synthesis of a distinctive upward velocity pulse at this station. Examination of the slip contribution to the synthetic velocity waveforms and comparison of the isochrones with the slip distribution suggest that a peak acceleration greater than 4000 cm/sec<sup>2</sup> observed at IWTH25 was generated from the area that is closest to the hypocenter in the southern particularly large slip area.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzuki, W., Aoi, S., Sekiguchi, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rupture Process of the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku, Japan, Earthquake Derived from Near-Source Strong-Motion Records [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>266</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>256</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/267?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rupture Process of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Duzce Earthquake from Joint Analysis of SPOT, GPS, InSAR, Strong-Motion, and Teleseismic Data: A Supershear Rupture with Variable Rupture Velocity [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/267?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We analyze the rupture process of the 1999 <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;7.1 Duzce earthquake using seismological, remote sensing, and geodetic data. Ground deformation measured from the subpixel cross correlation of Satellite Pour l'Observation de la Terre (SPOT) images reveals a 55&nbsp;km long fault trace and smooth surface-slip distribution peaking at 3.5&ndash;4&nbsp;m. The westernmost segment overlaps for over 10&nbsp;km with ruptures from the <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;7.4 Izmit earthquake. The 15&nbsp;km long easternmost segment, which cuts across mountainous topography, had not been reported previously. We determine a well-constrained source model using a four-segment fault geometry using constraints on surface fault slip and inverting Global Positioning System and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar data along with strong-motion records. Our results show that some variability of the rupture velocity and an eastward supershear velocity are required to fit the strong-motion data. The rise time, up to 6&nbsp;sec, correlates with cumulative slip, suggesting a sliding velocity of about 1 m/sec. The source model predicts teleseismic waveforms well, although early by 2&nbsp;sec. This time shift is probably due to the weak beginning of the earthquake that is not observable at teleseismic distances. Strong-motion records are relatively well predicted from a source model derived from the teleseismic data using the fault geometry derived from the satellite images. This study demonstrates the benefit of using accurate fault geometries to determine finite-fault source models.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Konca, A. O., Leprince, S., Avouac, J.-P., Helmberger, D. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090072</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rupture Process of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Duzce Earthquake from Joint Analysis of SPOT, GPS, InSAR, Strong-Motion, and Teleseismic Data: A Supershear Rupture with Variable Rupture Velocity [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>288</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>267</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/289?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Source Rupture Plane Determination from Directivity Doppler Effect for Small Earthquakes Recorded by Local Networks [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/289?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Fault plane solutions from first motion polarity of <I>P</I>-waves give two nodal planes among which it is not possible to distinguish the fault plane from the auxiliary one. We found that, for earthquakes recorded by a dense local network, it is possible to identify the rupture direction from the Doppler effect produced by directivity. This principle was successfully applied, using three different simple techniques (direct inspection and time and frequency domains analyses), to one <I>M</I><SUB><I>L</I></SUB>&nbsp;3.6 and six smaller (1.2&le;<I>M</I><SUB><I>L</I></SUB>&le;2.0) well-recorded earthquakes from northern Baja California, Mexico. The results indicate activity in faults conjugate to those currently mapped in this region.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frez, J., Nava, F. A., Acosta, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090139</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Source Rupture Plane Determination from Directivity Doppler Effect for Small Earthquakes Recorded by Local Networks [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>297</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>289</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/298?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Asperity and Barriers of the 2004 Mid-Niigata Prefecture Earthquake Revealed by Highly Dense Seismic Observations [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/298?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A highly resolved velocity structure on the mainshock fault of the 2004 Mid-Niigata prefecture earthquake was elucidated using arrival times from aftershocks observed by an extremely dense network of temporary seismic stations. We evaluated the spatial relationship between the velocity structure and distributions of the slip, stress change, and aftershocks. Distributions of static stress drop on the fault were calculated from a kinematic slip model, incorporating the 3D crustal structure. A high-velocity body with low aftershock activity was in proximity to the mainshock hypocenter and extended to the northeast side of the fault. This high-velocity body roughly coincided with an asperity, where the amounts of coseismic slip and static stress drop were larger than those in the surrounding areas. In contrast, a zone of negative stress drop was observed on the shallow periphery of the high-velocity body, where the sediment thickness steeply increased southwestward and the aftershock activity was high. We suggest that the structural heterogeneities of the host rocks surrounding the fault damaged zone have significant potentials to control dynamic rupture processes of the mainshock fault.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kato, A., Miyatake, T., Hirata, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090218</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Asperity and Barriers of the 2004 Mid-Niigata Prefecture Earthquake Revealed by Highly Dense Seismic Observations [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>306</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>298</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/307?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Do Strike-Slip Faults of Molise, Central-Southern Italy, Really Release a High Stress? [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/307?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The 31 October and 1 November 2002 Molise earthquakes (both <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;5.7) were caused by right-lateral slip between 12 and 20&nbsp;km depth. These earthquakes are the result of large-scale reactivation of preexisting, left-lateral, regionally extended east&ndash;west structures of Mesozoic age. Although recorded ground motions were generally smaller than expected for typical Italian earthquakes, a recent paper attributes a stress drop as high as 180&nbsp;bars to the Molise earthquakes. We remark that a high stress drop is in contrast both with the relatively long source duration inferred in previous investigations and with geodetic evidence for a significantly smaller fault slip compared with other Apennine earthquakes having similarly large rupture area (e.g., 1997 Umbria&ndash;Marche earthquakes).</p>
<p>We analyzed both ground acceleration spectra of the mainshocks and single-station spectral ratios of broadband seismograms in an extended magnitude range (2.7&le;<I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&le;5.7). Our results show that neither the spectral amplitudes of recorded ground motions nor the spectral ratios can be fit by a high stress-drop source. Instead we find that the observations are consistent with a low stress drop, our best estimates ranging between 6 and 25&nbsp;bars, in agreement with the relatively long source duration and small coseismic slip.</p>
<p>We interpret the low stress of the 2002 Molise earthquakes in terms of lower energy release mechanisms due to the reutilization of faults reactivated opposite to their original sense of slip.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calderoni, G., Rovelli, A., Milana, G., Valensise, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090046</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Do Strike-Slip Faults of Molise, Central-Southern Italy, Really Release a High Stress? [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>324</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>307</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/325?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Seismic Slip Deficit in the Southwestern Forearc of the Hellenic Subduction Zone [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/325?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The seismic coupling and the spatiotemporal distribution of seismicity on the presumed rupture surface of the 365&nbsp;A.D. <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB> 8.3&plusmn;0.2 Crete event at the shallow plate contact of the Hellenic subduction zone (HSZ) southwest of Crete is investigated. The maximum cumulative average seismic slip (<I>U</I><SUB>seis</SUB>) on the rupture surface is estimated for different time periods using historic and instrumental seismicity catalogs and utilizing a formula that incorporates empirical relations linking rupture area and average slip of an event to its moment magnitude (<I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>). Events above the completeness magnitude of the catalog are incorporated by summation while events below are taken account of by integrating over the extrapolated frequency&ndash;magnitude distribution using a truncated Gutenberg&ndash;Richter relation.</p>
<p>Estimates of <I>U</I><SUB>seis</SUB> for the time intervals 0&ndash;1999, 1500&ndash;1999, and 1964&ndash;2006 using historic and instrumental catalogs suggest a considerable seismic slip deficit when compared with the total slip expected from the temporal extrapolation of geodetic measurements. This suggests a recent weakly coupled plate contact and a total slip predominantly accommodated aseismically despite the 365&nbsp;A.D. event. High seismic activity up to magnitudes of about <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;6 is found accompanying the aseismic slip at the plate contact.</p>
<p>Investigations of the seismicity distribution hint at a spatial variability of the seismic energy release in the western forearc of the HSZ. Activity in the proximity of the 365&nbsp;A.D. epicenter is observed to be an order of magnitude larger than toward the northwest between Crete and Peloponnese. This spatiotemporal variability of the seismic energy release and seismic coupling suggests that subregions of the plate contact undergo alternating periods of locking followed by intermediate magnitude events and aseismic sliding. Thus, the behavior of significant portions of the plate contact southwest of Crete may be described as conditionally stable.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Becker, D., Meier, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090156</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Seismic Slip Deficit in the Southwestern Forearc of the Hellenic Subduction Zone [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>342</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>325</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/343?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A New Look at Evidence for a Wadati-Benioff Zone and Active Convergence at the North Panama Deformed Belt [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/343?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The nature of the northern boundary of the Panama microplate, often referred to as the north Panama deformed belt (NPDB), has been the subject of much speculation. Previous studies have used a variety of data, including teleseismic, gravity, bathymetric, marine magnetic, and field studies of uplift and tsunami deposits, as well as modified Mercalli intensity distributions from historic earthquakes to reveal the nature of the NPDB. Data have been collected for over 30&nbsp;yrs and yet the character of the NPDB remains unclear. Current analyses and interpretation provide a number of mutually exclusive options and much controversy. In this article we examine local and regional seismicity combined with teleseismic observations and historic earthquake data to present an alternative analysis for the NPDB. Using small earthquakes recorded by a local network we image a well-defined Wadati&ndash;Benioff zone dipping southward beneath the Panama microplate. These data provide new evidence regarding the nature of Panama microplate&ndash;Caribbean plate boundary kinematics and demonstrate the existence of an active subduction zone. A more complete understanding of the nature of the seismicity and plate interactions along the NPDB offshore Panama, including a subduction zone capable of producing earthquakes of <I>M</I>&gt;7, should be included in future earthquake hazard assessments.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Camacho, E., Hutton, W., Pacheco, J. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090204</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A New Look at Evidence for a Wadati-Benioff Zone and Active Convergence at the North Panama Deformed Belt [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>348</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>343</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/349?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bayesian Inference on Earthquake Size Distribution: A Case Study in Italy [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/349?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article is focused on the study of earthquake size statistical distribution by using Bayesian inference. The strategy consists in the definition of an <I>a priori</I> distribution based on instrumental seismicity and modeled as a power-law distribution. By using the observed historical data, the power law is then modified in order to obtain the posterior distribution. The aim of this article is to define the earthquake size distribution using all the seismic database available (i.e., instrumental and historical catalogs) and a robust statistical technique. We apply this methodology to the Italian seismicity, dividing the territory in source zones as done for the seismic hazard assessment, taken here as a reference model. The results suggest that each area has its own peculiar trend: while the power law is able to capture the mean aspect of the earthquake size distribution, the posterior emphasizes different slopes in different areas. Our results are in general agreement with the ones used in the seismic hazard assessment in Italy. However, there are areas in which a flattening in the curve is shown, meaning a significant departure from the power-law behavior and implying that there are some local aspects that a power-law distribution is not able to capture.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faenza, L., Meletti, C., Sandri, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090054</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bayesian Inference on Earthquake Size Distribution: A Case Study in Italy [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>363</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>349</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/364?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Aftershock Characteristics as a Means of Discriminating Explosions from Earthquakes [Article]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/364?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The behavior of aftershock sequences around the Nevada Test Site (NTS) in the southern Great Basin is characterized as a potential discriminant between explosions and earthquakes. The aftershock model designed by <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf22">Reasenberg and Jones (1989</cross-ref>, <cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf23">1994)</cross-ref> allows for a probabilistic statement of earthquakelike aftershock behavior at any time after the mainshock. We use this model to define two types of aftershock discriminants. The first defines <I>M</I><SUB><I>X</I></SUB>, or the minimum magnitude of an aftershock expected within a given duration after the mainshock with probability <I>X</I>. Of the 67 earthquakes with <I>M</I>&gt;4 in the study region, 63 of them produce an aftershock greater than <I>M</I><SUB>99</SUB> within the first 7&nbsp;days after a mainshock. This is contrasted with only six of 93 explosions with <I>M</I>&gt;4 that produce an aftershock greater than <I>M</I><SUB>99</SUB> for the same period. If the aftershock magnitude threshold is lowered and the <I>M</I><SUB>90</SUB> criteria is used, then no explosions produce an aftershock greater than <I>M</I><SUB>90</SUB> for durations that end more than 17&nbsp;days after the mainshock. The other discriminant defines <I>N</I><SUB><I>X</I></SUB>, or the minimum cumulative number of aftershocks expected for a given time after the mainshock with probability <I>X</I>. Similar to the aftershock magnitude discriminant, five earthquakes do not produce more aftershocks than <I>N</I><SUB>99</SUB> within 7&nbsp;days after the mainshock. However, within the same period, all but one of the explosions produce fewer aftershocks than <I>N</I><SUB>99</SUB>. One explosion is added if the duration is shortened to 2&nbsp;days after the mainshock. The cumulative number aftershock discriminant is more reliable, especially at short durations, but requires a low magnitude of completeness for the given earthquake catalog. These results at NTS are quite promising and should be evaluated at other nuclear test sites to understand the effects of differences in the geologic setting and nuclear testing practices on its performance.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ford, S. R., Walter, W. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080349</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Aftershock Characteristics as a Means of Discriminating Explosions from Earthquakes [Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>376</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>364</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/377?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unusual Microseisms Seen in the Reelfoot Fault Zone, Northern Tennessee, from a Reflection Experiment [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/377?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A swarm of microseisms with ground motions equivalent to earthquakes of <I>M</I><SUB>L</SUB> -1 and smaller was fortuitously detected in 100 of 162, 14 sec-duration long-offset vibroseis shot gathers collected for a seismic reflection experiment near Mooring, Tennessee, directly over the Reelfoot fault zone on the afternoon of 16 November 2006. These natural events show up in the shot gathers as near-vertically incident <I>P</I> waves with a dominant frequency of 8&ndash;10&nbsp;Hz and probably occurred at depths of greater than 10&nbsp;km. The inferred seismicity rate of 250&ndash;1000 events per hour is 2&ndash;3 orders of magnitude higher than the background seismicity rate for the New Madrid seismic zone. This detection of microseismic swarms in the Reelfoot fault zone indicates active physical processes that may be similar to nonvolcanic tremor seen in the Cascadia and San Andreas fault zones and merits long-term monitoring to understand its source.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Langston, C. A., Rieger, D. M., Magnani, M. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090117</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unusual Microseisms Seen in the Reelfoot Fault Zone, Northern Tennessee, from a Reflection Experiment [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>383</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>377</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/384?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Source Fault of the 2007 Chuetsu-oki, Japan, Earthquake [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/384?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The 2007 Chuetsu-oki, Japan, earthquake is the world&rsquo;s first major earthquake upon a source fault that extends beneath a nuclear power plant and is also characterized by difficulty determining the source fault plane. Centroid Moment Tensor solutions indicate an <I>M</I><SUB>w</SUB>&nbsp;6.6 reverse-faulting crustal earthquake with conjugate fault planes dipping to the northwest and southeast. Early results of aftershock locations suggest that either northwest-dipping plane or southeast-dipping plane can be the source fault plane of this earthquake. We carried out source inversions and empirical Green&rsquo;s function simulations of observed seismograms; however, they resulted in similar waveform residuals for the two fault planes. We then determined the relative locations of earthquake asperities to the hypocenter using travel-time differences of strong-motion pulses and relocated the aftershocks observed by ocean bottom seismometers deployed in the source region. These results imply that slips mainly occurred on the southeast-dipping fault plane. This implication was later confirmed by results of reflection surveys. During the earthquake, the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant experienced stronger ground motions than those anticipated at the time of design. The ground motions consist of three seismic pulses that correspond to three asperities. The first and second pulses arose from rupture propagation to the plant, while the compact asperity on the distant southeast-dipping fault plane and its <I>S</I>-wave radiation pattern are responsible for the significant third pulse.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miyake, H., Koketsu, K., Hikima, K., Shinohara, M., Kanazawa, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090126</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Source Fault of the 2007 Chuetsu-oki, Japan, Earthquake [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>391</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>384</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/392?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Study of Ambient Noise over an Onshore Oil Field in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates [Short Note]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/392?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The characteristics of ambient noise over an onshore oil field in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, have been investigated using arrays of three-component broadband seismometers by means of spectral amplitude and array wavenumber analysis within a frequency range of 0.1&ndash;10&nbsp;Hz. The experiment was conducted to better understand the characteristics and origins of microseism (0.15&ndash;0.4&nbsp;Hz) and microtremor (about 2.0&ndash;3.0&nbsp;Hz) signals that have been reported as being a hydrocarbon indicator above several reservoirs in the region. The results of this study indicate that the long-period double-frequency peaks of microseism signals are generated by oceanic storms in the Arabian Sea as confirmed by data acquired throughout the impact of Cyclone Gonu on the coast of Oman. The study demonstrates that a narrowband of microtremor signals has no clear correlation with the recorded microseism signals. Cyclical daily and weekly variations in the spectral amplitudes of the signals clearly correlate with human activity. The results of this study, therefore, indicate that in this location the microseism and microtremor signals are not related to the presence of hydrocarbons in the subsurface but may be attributed to meteorological and anthropogenic effects, respectively.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ali, M. Y., Berteussen, K. A., Small, J., Barkat, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090131</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Study of Ambient Noise over an Onshore Oil Field in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates [Short Note]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>401</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>392</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/402?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comment on "The October 2005 Georgian Bay, Canada, Earthquake Sequence: Mafic Dykes and Their Role in the Mechanical Heterogeneity of Precambrian Crust" by S. Dineva, D. Eaton, S. Ma, and R. Mereu [Comment and Reply]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/1/402?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>It has been proposed (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="rf1">Dineva <I>et&nbsp;al.</I>, 2007</cross-ref>) that the location of upper to midcrustal earthquakes in the Canadian Precambrian shield is related to rheological differences between mafic dykes and country rock. We show that this hypothesis is critically dependent on assumed lithology, strain rate, and temperature, and consequently is not established with any level of confidence. Furthermore, it appears to lack self-consistency because it postulates earthquakes to occur in the ductile regime.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ranalli, G., Lamontagne, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120080313</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comment on "The October 2005 Georgian Bay, Canada, Earthquake Sequence: Mafic Dykes and Their Role in the Mechanical Heterogeneity of Precambrian Crust" by S. Dineva, D. Eaton, S. Ma, and R. Mereu [Comment and Reply]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>405</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>402</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Comment and Reply</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/1/406?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to "Comment on 'The October 2005 Georgian Bay, Canada, Earthquake Sequence: Mafic Dykes and Their Role in the Mechanical Heterogeneity of Precambrian Crust' by S. Dineva, D. Eaton, S. Ma, and R. Mereu" by G. Ranalli and M. Lamontagne [Comment and Reply]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/1/406?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dineva, S., Eaton, D. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090100</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to "Comment on 'The October 2005 Georgian Bay, Canada, Earthquake Sequence: Mafic Dykes and Their Role in the Mechanical Heterogeneity of Precambrian Crust' by S. Dineva, D. Eaton, S. Ma, and R. Mereu" by G. Ranalli and M. Lamontagne [Comment and Reply]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>407</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>406</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Comment and Reply</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/1/408?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comment on "An Upper Bound on Rg to Lg Scattering Using Modal Energy Conservation" by Jeffry L. Stevens, Heming Xu, and G. Eli Baker [Comment and Reply]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/1/408?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patton, H. J., Gupta, I. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090109</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comment on "An Upper Bound on Rg to Lg Scattering Using Modal Energy Conservation" by Jeffry L. Stevens, Heming Xu, and G. Eli Baker [Comment and Reply]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>415</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>408</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Comment and Reply</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/1/416?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to "Comment on 'An Upper Bound on Rg to Lg Scattering Using Modal Energy Conservation' by Jeffry L. Stevens, Heming Xu, and G. Eli Baker" by Howard Patton and Indra N. Gupta [Comment and Reply]]]></title>
<link>http://www.bssaonline.org/cgi/content/short/100/1/416?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stevens, J. L., Xu, H., Baker, G. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1785/0120090174</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to "Comment on 'An Upper Bound on Rg to Lg Scattering Using Modal Energy Conservation' by Jeffry L. Stevens, Heming Xu, and G. Eli Baker" by Howard Patton and Indra N. Gupta [Comment and Reply]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>421</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>416</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Comment and Reply</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>